Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2019.63.5.376

Exploring Learning Progression of Logical Thinking in Acid and Base Chemical Reactions  

Park, Chulyong (Kongju National University High School)
Kim, Sungki (Gwangju Science Academy for the Gifted)
Choi, Hee (Bongmyeong High School)
Paik, Seoung-Hey (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the learning progression of logical thinking in acid and base chemical reactions and to evaluate its validity. For this purpose, we collected 387 participants in 9 schools of elementary, middle and high schools nationwide. The questionnaire developed in this study was composed of nine items. The questionnaire presented the acid and base reactants and products, and the students pictured their thoughts on how these substances change, and answered the reasons of their thoughts. Situation contexts of the questionnaire were divided into two groups: one kind of solute dissolved in a solvent, and two kinds of solute dissolved in a solvent. In this study, six levels of learning progression were assumed by combining material conservation logic, combination logic, proportion logic, and particle number conservation logic. By analyzing the data, Infit and Outfit values of Person reliability, Item reliability, MNSQ and ZSTD were obtained from the Rasch model. As a result of the analysis of data, it was found that lower levels of learning progression prevailed up to the younger grade students till $8^{th}$ grade. The higher levels of learning progression(Level 2~Level 5) prevailed up to the older grade students. However, higher levels of learning progression dropped sharply in Grade 12. The 5 level of learning progression was very low in all grades, and $9^{th}$ grade had highest percentage of students belonging to the 5 level. Interpretation of these unusual results suggests a future research related to explanation differences of textbooks.
Keywords
Acid-base; Logical thinking; Learning Progression; Student;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Nakhleh, M. B. J. Chem. Educ. 1992, 69, 191.   DOI
2 Garnett, P. J.; Garnett, P. J.; Hackling, M. W. Stud. Sci. Educ. 1995, 25, 69.   DOI
3 Taber, K. S. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2000, 22, 399.   DOI
4 Teo, T. W.; Goh, M. T.; Yeo, L. W. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2014, 15, 470.   DOI
5 Gilbert, J. K.; Watts, D. M. Stud. Sci. Educ. 1983, 10, 61.   DOI
6 Tumay, H. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2014, 15, 366.   DOI
7 Tumay, H. Sci. Educ. 2016, 25, 21.   DOI
8 Schmidt, H.-J. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 1991, 13, 459.   DOI
9 Wandersee, J. H.; Mintzes, J. J.; Novak, J. D. Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning; Gabel, D. L. Ed.; Macmillan Publishing Company: NY: 1994; pp 177-210.
10 Sanger, M. J.; Greenbowe, T. J. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 853.   DOI
11 Schmidt, H. J.; Baumgartner, T.; Eybe H. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2003, 40, 257.   DOI
12 Demircioglu, G.; Ayas, A.; Demircioglu, H. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2005, 6, 36.   DOI
13 Gilbert, J. K.; Treagust D. F. Multiple Representations in Chemical Education: Springer: Dordrecht, 2009.
14 Johnstone, A. H. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 1991, 7, 75.   DOI
15 Taber, K. S. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2008, 30, 1027.   DOI
16 Talanquer, V. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 811.   DOI
17 Johnstone, A. H. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2000, 1, 9.   DOI
18 Jensen, W. B. J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75, 679.   DOI
19 Hoffmann, R.; Laszlo P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1.   DOI
20 Cooper, M. M.; Underwood, S. M.; Hilley C. Z.; Klymkowsky, M. W. J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 1351.   DOI
21 Talanquer, V. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2018, 19, 998.   DOI
22 Chittleborough, G.; Treagust, D. F. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2007, 8, 274.   DOI
23 Talanquer, V. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2011, 33, 179.   DOI
24 Taber, K. S. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2013, 14, 156.   DOI
25 Ben-Zvi, R.; Eylon, B. S.; Silberstein, J. J. Chem. Educ. 1986, 63, 64.   DOI
26 Griffiths, A. K.; Preston, K. R. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1992, 29, 611.   DOI
27 Chi, M. T. J. Learn. Sci. 2005, 14, 161.   DOI
28 Rappoport, L. T.; Ashkenazi, G. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2008, 30, 1585.   DOI
29 Lee, O.; Eichinger, D. C.; Anderson, C. W.; Berkheimer, G. D.; Blakeslee, T. D. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1993, 30, 249.   DOI
30 Albanese, A.; Vicentini, M. Sci. Educ. 1997, 6, 251.   DOI
31 Talanquer, V. Sci. Educ. 2008, 92, 96.   DOI
32 Cros, D.; Maurin, M.; Amouroux, R.; Chastrette, M.; Leber, J.; Fayol, M. J. Sci. Educ. 1986, 8, 305.
33 Hand, B. M.; Treagust, D. F. Res. Sci. Educ. 1988, 18, 53.   DOI
34 Ross, M. Psy. Rev. 1989, 96, 341.   DOI
35 Zoller, U. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1990, 27, 1053.   DOI
36 Ross, B.; Munby, H. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 1991, 13, 11.   DOI
37 Nakhleh, M. B.; Krajcik, J. S. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1994, 31, 1077.   DOI
38 Schmidt, R. Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning 1995, 9, 1.
39 Sheppard, K. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2006, 7, 32.   DOI
40 Orgill, M.; Sutherland, A. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 2008, 9, 131.   DOI
41 Ozmen, H.; Demircioglu, H.; Demircioglu, G. Comput. Educ. 2009, 52, 681.   DOI
42 Artdej, R.; Ratanaroutai, T.; Coll, R. K.; Thongpanchang, T. Res. Sci. Tech. Educ. 2010, 28, 167.   DOI
43 Cetin-Dindar, A.; Geban, O. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011, 15, 600.   DOI
44 Cetin-Dindar, A.; Geban, O. J. Educ. Res. 2017, 110, 85.   DOI
45 McClary, L. M.; Bretz, S. L. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2012, 34, 2317.   DOI
46 Nakhleh, M. B.; Mitchell, R. C. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, 190.   DOI
47 Morgil, I.; Yavuz, S.; Oskay, O. O.; Arda, S. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 2005, 6, 52.   DOI
48 Hoe, K. Y.; Subramaniam, R. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 2016, 17, 263.   DOI
49 Kousathana, M.; Demerouti, M.; Tsaparlis, G. Sci. Educ. 2005, 14, 173.   DOI
50 Voska, K. W.; Heikkinen, H. W. Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2000, 37, 160.   DOI
51 Bunce, D. M.; Gabel, D. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2002, 39, 911.   DOI
52 Nyachwaya, J. M.; Mohamed, A. R.; Roehrig, G. H.; Wood, N. B.; Kern, A. L.; Schneider, J. L. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 2011, 12, 121.   DOI
53 Lin, J. W.; Chiu, M. H. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2007, 29, 771.   DOI
54 Furio-Mas, C.; Calatayud, M. L.; Guisasolac, J.; Furio- Gomeza, C. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2005, 27, 1337.   DOI
55 Romine, W. L.; Todd, A. N.; Clark, T. B. Sci. Educ. 2016, 100, 1150.   DOI
56 Morell, L.; Collier, T.; Black, P.; Wilson, M. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2017, 54, 1024.   DOI
57 Shea, N. A.; Duncan, R. G. J. Learn. Sci. 2013, 22, 7.   DOI
58 Roadrangka, V.; Yeany, R. H.; Padilla, M. J. In 56th Annual Meeting of the National Association for Res. Sci. Teach. 1983, 5-8.
59 Lawson, A. E. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1978, 15, 11.   DOI
60 Inhelder, B.; Piaget, J. The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence: An Essay on the Construction of Formal Operational Structures, Psychology Press: 1958.
61 Stains, M.; Talanquer, V. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2007, 29, 643.   DOI
62 Creswell, J. W.; Miller, D. L. Theory Into Practice, 2000, 39, 124.   DOI
63 Chung, H. J. Coach. Develop. 2005, 7, 133.
64 Yan, F.; Talanquer, V. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2015, 37, 3066.   DOI
65 Wright, B. D.; Linacre, J. M. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1994, 8, 370.
66 Duschl, R. A.; Schweingruber, H. A.; Shouse, A. W. Taking Science to School. Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8; National Academies Press: Washington, DC; 2007.
67 National Research Council. How People learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Eds.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2000.