Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.362

An Analysis of Concept Description and Model and Student Understanding About Ionic Compound in Textbooks Developed Under the 2009 Revised National Curriculum  

Shin, He Young (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University)
Woo, Ae Ja (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Abstract
In this study, ionic compound in the science textbooks developed under the 2009 revised national curriculum were analyzed in terms of the scientific concept and model description and the student understanding through the questionnaires. Analysis of textbooks was performed for science2 of middle school and chemistry I & II of high school. Questionnaire was carried out with 194 students including middle school 2nd grade and high school 1st-3rd grade. The results are as follows: First, as a result of analysis of textbooks, scientific concepts and models used to explain the ionic compound showed differences depending on the types of textbooks. In addition, scientific models were provided with or without explanation for the scientific concepts. Second, analysis of the questionnaire showed that students didn’t properly understood scientific concepts and models in the ion formation, stoichiometric ratio between ions.
Keywords
Ion; Ionic compound; Ionic bond; 2009 revised national curriculum;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Nakhleh, M. B.; Samarapungavan, A.; Saglam, Y. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2005, 42, 581.   DOI
2 Teichert, M. A.; Tien, L. T.; Anthony, S.; Rickey, D. International Journal of Science Education 2008, 30, 1095.   DOI
3 Barke, H. D.; Hazari, A.; Yitbarek, S. Misconceptions in Chemistry Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education; Springer: 2009, 21.
4 Yoon, H. J.; Lee, Y. H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2014, 58, 580.   DOI
5 Yoon, H. J.; Lee, Y. H.; Kim Y. S. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2015, 59, 499.   DOI
6 Shin, S. H.; Park, H. J.; Yang, K. U. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 2016, 60, 48.   DOI
7 Treagust, D. F.; Chittleborough, G.; Mamiala, T. L. International Journal of Science Education 2003, 25, 1353-1368.   DOI
8 Kang, S. H.; Cho, S. A. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 1999, 43, 707.
9 Johnstone, A. H. School Science Review 1982, 64, 377.
10 Taber, Keith S. Chemical Misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure Volume II, Royal Society Chemistry: 2002.
11 Kang, N. H.; Lee, E. M. Journal of Korea Association Science Education 2013, 33, 132.   DOI
12 Yun, E. J.; Park, Y. B. Journal of Korea Association Science Education 2013, 33, 735.   DOI
13 Ju, H. M., Korea Textbook Research Foundation, International Textbook Symposium; Seoul Museum of history: Seoul, October 2015.
14 Seo, J. H.; Chung, J. I.; Han, J. Y. Paik, S. H.; Dong, H. K.; Kim, Y. J. Educational Research, 2010, 49, 5.   DOI
15 Jo, K. H.; Song, J. W. Teacher Education Research, 2012, 51, 259.   DOI
16 Lee, G. H. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 2011, 32, 687.   DOI
17 Go, H. S.; Kim, K. E.; Paik, S. H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2012, 56, 739.   DOI
18 Kim, S. H.; Lee, E. S.; Paik, S. H. Journal of Korea Association Science Education, 2008, 28, 291.
19 Ministry of Education. Science Curriculum, 1997, No 1997-15.
20 Park, J. S.; Cho, H. H. Journal of Korea Association Science Education 1986, 6, 35.
21 Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. Science Curriculum, 2007, No 2007-79.
22 Kang, S. H.; Bang, D. I.; Kim, S. J. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2012, 56, 739.   DOI
23 Whang, I. S.; Eom, K. H. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 2006, 10, 1.
24 Han, Y. H.; Kang, D. H.; Yang, I.H.; Paik, S. H.; Park, K. T. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 1999, 43, 340.
25 Lee, S. J. A content analysis on the part of ion & electrolyte in science3 textbook of 2007 revised curriculum, Master Dissertation, KookMin University, Seoul, Korea, January, 2013.
26 An, M. K.; Son, Y. A.; Kim, D. R. Secondary Education Research. 2013, 61, 871.   DOI
27 Lee, S. Y. Comparative Analysis of Connectivity between the Chemistry Par to Middle School Science and High School Chemistry in 2009 Revision Curriculum, Master Dissertation, Kongju National University, Gong ju, Korea, December, 2013.
28 Dong, H. K.; Kim, H. K.; Lee, I. H.; Kwon, K. P.; Lee, G. H. 68th conference, July, 2015, Korea Association Science Education, KAIST IT Convergence Campus. Daejeon.
29 Kwon, H. S. Chemical Education, 2008, 35, 31.
30 Jung, J. Y. An Analysis on the Level of Cognitive Demand Degree for Evaluation Questions about the Section of ‘the Characteristics of Materials’ and ‘Electrolyte and Ion’ in the Science 3 Textbook for the 2nd Grade of Middle School, Master Dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea, December, 2012.
31 Ministry of Education and Science Technology. catalog of textbook 2014-1. 2012.
32 Ministry of Education and Science Technology. 2009 Revised Curriculum standard of accomplishment. 2012.
33 Davis, A. H.; Challoner, J.; Burnie, D.; Dinwiddie, R.; Harvey, D.; Hughes, D.; Sparrow, G.; Stotte, C.; Weeks, M. SCIENCE: The Definitive Visual Guide. Hard cover; DK (Dorling Kindersley) Publishing: 2012.
34 Atkins, P.; Jones, L. Chemical Principles: The Quest for Insight, 5th edition; W. H. Freeman and Company: 2012.
35 Taber, K. S. EducacioQuimicaEduQnumero 4 2009, 13.
36 Ministry of Education and Science Technology. Science Curriculum, 2011, No 2011-361.
37 Oxtoby, D. W.; Gillis, H. P.; Campion, A. Principles Modern Chemistry. 7th edition; CENGAGE Learning: 2012.
38 Masterton, W. L.; Hurley, C. N. Chemistry: Principles and Reactions. 6th edition; CENGAGE Learning: 2009.
39 Moore, J. W., Stanitski, C. L.; Jurs, P. C. Principles of Chemistry: The Molecular Science, Brooks/Cole; CENGAGE Learning: 2010.
40 Raimond C.; Overby, J. General Chemistry: The Essential Concepts, 6th edition; The McGrawHill Companies: 2010.
41 Zumdahl, S. S.; Zumdahl, S. A. Chemistry. 8th edition, CENGAGE Learning. 2010.
42 McMury, J. E.; Fay, R. C. Chemistry. 6th edition; PEARSON: 2012.
43 Houghton, H. O. Houghton Mifflin Science, Grade 6, Mifflin, G. ed.; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH): 2007.
44 Chun, H. J. A Comparative Study on the Approaches ‘Ion’ Conceptin Science Textbooks by National Curriculum Changes, Master Dissertation, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea, February, 2012.