1 |
Bernsen, N. O. A research agenda for modality theory. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Graphical Representations, Reasoning and Communication; Cox, R.; Petre, M.; Brna, P. and Lee, J., Eds.; World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Edinburgh, 1993; p 43.
|
2 |
Eliam, B.; Poyas, Y. Learning and Instruction 2008, 18(4), 368.
DOI
|
3 |
Pineda, L.; Garza, G. Computational Linguistics 2000, 26(2), 139.
DOI
|
4 |
Tang, K.; Moje, E. Research in Science Education 2010, 40(1), 81.
DOI
|
5 |
Cho, H. S. The Impact of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on Students' Use of Multi Modal Representation and Embeddedness in Science Writing; Pusan National University of Education: Korea, 2009.
|
6 |
Lee, D. W. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2011, 31(6), 931.
|
7 |
Ainsworth, S. E. Computers & Education 1999, 33, 131.
DOI
|
8 |
Ainsworth, S. E.; Bibby, P. A.; Wood, D. J. Pedagogy and Education 1997, 6(1), 93.
|
9 |
Roth, W. M.; McGinn, M. K. Review of Education Research 1998, 68(1), 35.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Winn, W. Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In Comprehension of graphics; W. Schnotz.; R. W. Kulhavy, Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1994; p 3.
|
11 |
Chandler, P.; Sweller, J. Cognition and Instruction 1991, 8(4), 293.
DOI
|
12 |
Kozma, R. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13(2), 205.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Mayer, R. E. Educational Psychologist 1997, 32(1), 1.
DOI
|
14 |
Mayer, R. E.; Moreno, R. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90(2), 312.
DOI
|
15 |
Mayer, R. E. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13(2), 125.
DOI
|
16 |
Anderson, T.L.; Bodner, G. M. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2008, 9, 93.
DOI
|
17 |
Bhattacharyya, G.; Bodner, G. M. Journal of Chemical Education 2005, 82(9), 1402.
DOI
|
18 |
Small, M. Y.; Lovett, S. B.; Scher, M. S. Journal of Educational Psychology 1993, 85(3), 520.
DOI
|
19 |
Tabachneck, H. J. M.; Leonardo, A. M.; Simon, H. A. How does an expert use a graph? a model of visual and verbal inferencing in economics. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; A. Ram.; K. Eiselt, Eds.; Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994; p 842.
|
20 |
Paivio, A. Imagery and verbal processes; New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
|
21 |
Lemke, J. L. Multimedia semiotics: Genres for science education and scientific literacy. In Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: meaning with power; M. J. Schleppegrell.; M. C. Colombi, Eds.; Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., 2002.
|
22 |
Roth, W. M.; Bowen, G. M. Linguistics and Education 2000, 10(3), 335.
|
23 |
Hand, B.; Choi, A.; Greenbowe, T.; Schroeder, J.; Bennett, W. Examining the impact of student use of multiplemode representations in constructing science arguments, Annual International Conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD, 2008.
|
24 |
McDermott, M. A. The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation on student construction of chemistry knowledge. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa, U.S.A., 2009.
|
25 |
Jewitt, C.; Kress, G.; Ogborn, J.; Charalampos, T. Educational Review 2001, 53(1), 4.
|
26 |
van Someren, M. W.; Reinmann, P.; Boshuizn, H. P. A.; de Jong, T. Learning with Multiple Representations; Elsevier: Oxford, U.K., 1998.
|