Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.4.500

The Impact of Multimodal Representation-based Lesson on Embeddedness of Multimodal Representation in High School Students' Writing  

Nam, Jeong-Hee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Lee, Dong-Won (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Nam, Young-Ho (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of multimodal representation-based lesson on embeddedness of multimodal representation in high school students' writing. The participants in this study were two groups of second-year science-track students (74 students) at an academic high school in a metropolitan city. One group (41 students) was assigned to the experimental group, the other group (33 students) was assigned to the comparative group. Data analysis showed that the students of the experimental group were better at utilizing and embedding multimodal representations. Thus, the conclusion was drawn that multimodal representation-based lesson had an effect on high school students' embeddedness of multimodal representation.
Keywords
Multimodal representation; Multimodal representation-based lesson; Embeddedness;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bernsen, N. O. A research agenda for modality theory. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Graphical Representations, Reasoning and Communication; Cox, R.; Petre, M.; Brna, P. and Lee, J., Eds.; World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Edinburgh, 1993; p 43.
2 Eliam, B.; Poyas, Y. Learning and Instruction 2008, 18(4), 368.   DOI
3 Pineda, L.; Garza, G. Computational Linguistics 2000, 26(2), 139.   DOI
4 Tang, K.; Moje, E. Research in Science Education 2010, 40(1), 81.   DOI
5 Cho, H. S. The Impact of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on Students' Use of Multi Modal Representation and Embeddedness in Science Writing; Pusan National University of Education: Korea, 2009.
6 Lee, D. W. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2011, 31(6), 931.
7 Ainsworth, S. E. Computers & Education 1999, 33, 131.   DOI
8 Ainsworth, S. E.; Bibby, P. A.; Wood, D. J. Pedagogy and Education 1997, 6(1), 93.
9 Roth, W. M.; McGinn, M. K. Review of Education Research 1998, 68(1), 35.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Winn, W. Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In Comprehension of graphics; W. Schnotz.; R. W. Kulhavy, Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1994; p 3.
11 Chandler, P.; Sweller, J. Cognition and Instruction 1991, 8(4), 293.   DOI
12 Kozma, R. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13(2), 205.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Mayer, R. E. Educational Psychologist 1997, 32(1), 1.   DOI
14 Mayer, R. E.; Moreno, R. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90(2), 312.   DOI
15 Mayer, R. E. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13(2), 125.   DOI
16 Anderson, T.L.; Bodner, G. M. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2008, 9, 93.   DOI
17 Bhattacharyya, G.; Bodner, G. M. Journal of Chemical Education 2005, 82(9), 1402.   DOI
18 Small, M. Y.; Lovett, S. B.; Scher, M. S. Journal of Educational Psychology 1993, 85(3), 520.   DOI
19 Tabachneck, H. J. M.; Leonardo, A. M.; Simon, H. A. How does an expert use a graph? a model of visual and verbal inferencing in economics. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; A. Ram.; K. Eiselt, Eds.; Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994; p 842.
20 Paivio, A. Imagery and verbal processes; New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
21 Lemke, J. L. Multimedia semiotics: Genres for science education and scientific literacy. In Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: meaning with power; M. J. Schleppegrell.; M. C. Colombi, Eds.; Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., 2002.
22 Roth, W. M.; Bowen, G. M. Linguistics and Education 2000, 10(3), 335.
23 Hand, B.; Choi, A.; Greenbowe, T.; Schroeder, J.; Bennett, W. Examining the impact of student use of multiplemode representations in constructing science arguments, Annual International Conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD, 2008.
24 McDermott, M. A. The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation on student construction of chemistry knowledge. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa, U.S.A., 2009.
25 Jewitt, C.; Kress, G.; Ogborn, J.; Charalampos, T. Educational Review 2001, 53(1), 4.
26 van Someren, M. W.; Reinmann, P.; Boshuizn, H. P. A.; de Jong, T. Learning with Multiple Representations; Elsevier: Oxford, U.K., 1998.