Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.1.115

Elementary and Secondary School Teachers' Perceptions on Inter-Disciplinary Science Education(IV)  

Bang, Dam-I (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University)
Kang, Soon-Hee (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Abstract
This is a survey research which investigated perceptions of 85 elementary and secondary school science teachers on inter-disciplinary teaching in general. It is expected that the results of this survey will help to find out the necessity, the appropriate time, the proper approach and the obstacles of inter-disciplinary education. Results indicated that 49.5% of the teachers were aware of inter-disciplinary teaching and 61.2% of the teachers agreed with the necessity of implementing inter-disciplinary strategy. However, considering difficulties in objective assessment and burdens of college entrance exam preparation, they responded that inter-disciplinary teaching could be more appropriate and feasible to be implemented for lower graders at elementary schools than secondary school students. Of the answers to the integrated approaches, 57.6% of teachers chose the theme-based approach, and 16.5% chose the problem-based approach. When they chose the theme-based approach, they stated the reason of educational readiness. On the other hand, when they chose the problem-based approach, they stated the reason of educational obligation which assumes that a problem solving needs inter-disciplinary approach. The teachers also selected 'lack of knowledge on other subjects' and 'lack of time to prepare teaching materials' as major predicaments in implementing inter-disciplinary approach. This suggests that there needs a clear and specific teaching strategy along with a guidance to teaching materials for inter-disciplinary teaching.
Keywords
Consilience; Inter-disciplinary education; Teachers' perception; Science education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Donna, M. W.; James W. S. Elementary methods-an integrated curriculum; Allyn & Bacon: NY, U.S.A., 1997.
2 Lee, G. M.; Choi, I. S. Effective management of integrated curriculum; Hakjisa: Seoul, Korea, 2009.
3 Kwang, S. J. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction 2010, 10(1), 381.
4 Park, K. S. Proceedings of the KERA(Korean Educational Research Association) Autumn Conference 2009, 17.
5 Bang, D. Development of teaching strategy using interdisciplinary analogy to enhance students' creative problem solving skills and examination of its effectiveness. Doctoral Dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea, 2011.
6 Kim, S. K. Proceedings of the KERA(Korean Educational Research Association) Autumn Conference 2009, 59.
7 So, K. H. Proceedings of the KERA(Korean Educational Research Association) Autumn Conference 2009, 89.
8 O, S. C. Proceedings of the KERA(Korean Educational Research Association) Autumn Conference 2009, 93.
9 Kim, J. B. Integrated curriculum; Kyoyookbook: Seoul, Korea, 2003.
10 Caspell, S. The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education 2007, 19(3), 20.
11 Elliott, B.; Oty, K.; Mcarthur, J.; Clark, B. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 2001, 32(6), 811.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Morrow, L. M.; Pressley, M.; Smith, J. K.; Smith, M. Reading Research Quarterly 1997, 32(1), 54.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Moseley, C.; Utley, J. Journal of Elementary Science Education 2006, 18(2), 1.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lee, Y. J.; Jung, G. N. Journal of Early Childhood Education 2006, 15(1), 143.
15 Shin, J. H. The Journal of Child Education 2006, 15(2), 301.
16 Sung, E. H.; Lee, M. J.; Jo, G. J. Journal of Future Early Childhood Education 2005, 12(4), 25.
17 Jung, H. S. The Effect of topic-centered integrated learning program on the learning interest and the self-directed learning ability of elementary school children's. Master Dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Cheongwonkun, Korea, 2005.
18 Hong, Y. K. Journal of Curriculum Integration 2009, 3(2), 42.
19 Han, H, B. Journal of Curriculum Integration 2009, 3(1), 111.
20 Drake, S. M.; Burns, R. C. Meeting standards through integrated curriculum; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: VA, U.S.A., 2004.
21 Fogarty, R. Educational Leadership 1991, 49(2), 61.
22 Kwack, B. S. Curriculum; Baeyoungsa: Seoul, Korea, 1983.
23 Routman, R. Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12; Portsmouth, N.H. Heinemann: Toronto, Canada, 1991.
24 Lee, O. Y. Birth of youth; itree: Seoul, Korea, 2008.
25 Goodlad, J. I.; Z. Su. The organization of the curriculum. In P. W. Jackson Ed.: Handbook of research of curriculum; Macmillan Publishing Company: NY, U.S.A., 1992.
26 Wilson, E. O. Consilience; Random House: NY, U.S.A., 1998.
27 Choi, J. C.; Ju, I. W. Consilience of knowledge; E-um: Seoul, Korea, 2007.
28 Yoo, K. C. Integrated education; kyoyookbook: Seoul, Korea, 2000.
29 Ministry of Education Science curriculum; Daehan Textbook Publishing: Seoul, Korea, 1998.
30 Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development Science curriculum; Daehan Textbook Publishing: Seoul, Korea, 2007.
31 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Science curriculum; Daehan Textbook Publishing: Seoul, Korea, 2009.
32 Ingram, J. B. Curriculum integration and lifelong education; Hamburg, UNESCO Institute for Education: Oxford, UK, 1979.
33 Lee, Y. M. The Pusan Journal of Educational Research 1994, 7, 65.
34 Kim, D. H.; Lee, Y. M. Development of integrated curriculum; YSBPUB: Seoul, Korea, 1995.
35 Greene, L. C. Educational Leadership 1991, 27.