Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2010.54.6.809

A Study of High School Students' Conceptions for Density  

Cho, In-Young (Seoul Global High School)
Kang, Young-Jin (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.54, no.6, 2010 , pp. 809-817 More about this Journal
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate high school students' conceptual understanding of density for solids and liquids in pure and mixed substances who had preceded formal school science instruction on density and related topics. A concept assessment on density was developed and administered by demonstrative experiments accompanied by a written assessment test method to 120 general high school students in a metropolitan city. The scientific conceptions and alternative conceptions from students' responses were identified and the percentages of them were calculated. Then, their alternative conceptions and implicit theories on density were analyzed. About half of the students couldn't differentiate weight-volume-density and regarded density as an innate property of matter. Furthermore, the greater the number of variables involved in an experimental condition of the question, the more complicated and undifferentiated students' density concepts were. Students employed more improper variables such as particle size, intermolecular distance, surface tension, polarity of the solvent, etc. in explaining counter-intuitive observations. The implications for school science instruction were discussed.
Keywords
Density; Alternative conception; Implicit theory;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yang I.; Kwon, Y.; Kim, Y.; Jang, M.; Jeong, J.; Park, K. Kor. Asso. Sci. Ed. 2002, 22, 314.
2 Hart, K. In Number concepts and operations in the middle grades.; Hiebert, J.; Behr, M., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, 1988; p 198.
3 Hewson, M.; Hewson, P. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1983, 20, 731.   DOI
4 Lesh, R.; Post, T.; Behr, M. In Number concepts and operations in the middle grades; Hiebert, J.; Behr, M., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, 1988; p 93.
5 Rowell, J. A.; Dawson, C. Sci. Ed. 1977, 61, 243.   DOI
6 Hewson, M. G. Sci. Ed. 1986, 70, 159.   DOI
7 Smith, C.; Carey, S.; Wiser, M. Cognition 1985, 21, 177.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Strauss, S.; Globerson, T.; Mintz, R. J. App. Dev. Psych. 1983, 4, 125.   DOI
9 Berkheimer, G. D.; Anderson, C. W.; Lee, O.; Blakeslee, T. D. Matter and molecules teacher's guide: Science book (Occasional paper No. 121); Michigan State University Institute for Research on Teaching: Lansing, MI, 1988.
10 Duckworth, E. Inventing Density; Center for Teaching and Learning, North Dakota Study Group on Evaluation: Grand Forks, ND, 1986.
11 Cole, H.; Raven, R. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1969, 6, 234.   DOI
12 Kim, C. The Effectiveness of Learning Cycle Approach to the Construction of the Concept of Density and Development of the Transformation Ability of INRC Group Related to the Concept of Density. Master's Thesis. Korea National University of Education. 1991.
13 Martin, D. J. Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach; Delmar Publishing: Aalbany, NY, 2000.
14 Strike, K. A.; Posner, F. J. In Cognitive structure and conceptual change; West, L. & Pines, L., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1985; p 211.
15 Strike, K. A.; Posner, F. J. In Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice; Duschl, R. A. & Hamilton, R. J., Ed.; State University of New York Press: NY, 1992; p 147.
16 Posner, F. J.; Strike, K. A.; Hewson, P. W.; Gertzog, W. A. Sci. Ed. 1982, 66, 211.   DOI
17 Carey, S. Conceptual Change in Childhood; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1985.
18 Spelke, E. Cog. 1994, 30, 431.
19 Reiner, M.; Slotta, J.; Chi, M. T.; Resnick, L. Cog. Ins. 2000, 18, 1.   DOI
20 Schnots, W.; Vosniadou, S.; Carretero, M. New perspectives on conceptual change; Pergamon Press; Oxford, U.K., 1999.
21 Attran, S. Cognitive foundations of natural history: Towards an anthropology of science; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1990.
22 Sperber, D. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach; Blackwell: Oxford, U.K., 1996.
23 Pozo, J. I.; Gomez Crespo, C. M. A. Cog. Ins. 2005, 23(3), 351.   DOI
24 Proclamation of the Ministry of Education 2007-79. Seoul, Korea: 2007.
25 Park, J.; Park, H. J. Kor. Chem. Soc. 2002, 46, 265.   DOI
26 Cho, I.; Park, H.; Choi, B. J. Kor. Chem. Soc. 1999, 43, 699.
27 Choi, B.; Kim, C. J. Kor. Assoc. Res. Sci. Edu. 1992, 12, 31.
28 Hong, S; Choi, B. J. Kor. Asso. Sci. Ed. 1991, 11, 15.
29 Kang, H.; Kim, M.; Noh, T. Kor. Asso. Sci. Ed. 2007, 27, 412.
30 Noh, T.; Kim, S.; Kang, S.; Kim, J. Kor. Asso. Sci. Ed. 2002, 22, 595.
31 Gopnik, A.; Meltzoff, A. N. Words, thoughts, and theories; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1997.
32 Carey, S. In Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate; Sperber, D.; Premack, D.; Premack, A. J., Ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, U.K., 1995; p 268.