Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2002.46.1.090

An Analysis of STS Contents in the High School Chemistry(II) Textbook  

Kim, Jung-Tae (KumJung High School)
Kim, Yun-Hi (Research Institute of Industrial Technology, Gyeongsang National University)
Moon, Seong-Bae (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.46, no.1, 2002 , pp. 90-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
The STS contents, emphasized in the 6th curriculum, in the chemistry textbooks(II) were analyzed. The STS contents in textbooks showed average value of 2.7%. The chapter of ‘chemical bond and compound' were included 3.8% of STS contents. And the chapter of ‘atomic structure and periodic table', ‘state of material and solution', ‘science of material', and ‘chemical reaction' contained 3.2%, 2.2%, 1.9%, and 1.9% of STS contents, respectively. When the STS contents were analyzed by STS topics of Piel, the results are as follows; 33.7% on effect of technological developments, 27.5% on environmental quality and utilization of natural source, 19.6% on human engineering, 13.8% on energy, and 5.4% on sociality of science. However, there were no topics on population, space research and national defense. When the STS contents were analyzed by student activities of SATIS, most of the activities were research and case study. There were few field activities of practical investigation, problem solving and decision making, research design and stimulation. There were no activities of role play.
Keywords
chemistry II textbook; STS content; STS subject; student activity of SATIS;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 권재술 한국과학교육학회지 1991, 11(1), 117.
2 백성혜 서울대학교 박사학위논문 1991.
3 백성혜 과학교육공동세미나 및 학술발표회 1992, 38.
4 강순자; 최명희; 이정아 한국생물교육학회지 1994, 11, 225.
5 송진웅; 박승제; 장경애 한국과학교육학회지 1992, 12, 109.
6 Yager, R. E. School Science and Mathematics 1988, 88(3), 694.
7 Yager, R. E. Iowa Science Teacher Journal 1990, 27(1). 2.
8 허명 새교육 1991, 91(9), 8.
9 Yager, R. E. The American Biology Teacher 1992, 54(6), 349.   DOI
10 한국교육개발원 1992. 1.
11 허명 한국학술진흥재단 연구보고서 1993, 1.
12 허명 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 교과교육연구, 1994, 3, 189.
13 하미경 한국과학교육학회지 1991, 11(2), 79.
14 조정일 한국과학교육학회지 1991, 11(2), 87.
15 최병순 한국과학기술단체총연합회 1992, 50.
16 김현재 한국초등과학학회 1992, 11(1), 16.
17 권용주 과학교육, 1992, 339, 66.
18 정완호; 권용주; 김영신 한국과학교육학회지, 1993, 13(1), 66.
19 김윤희; 권효진; 문정배 대한화학회지 1999, 43(3), 321.
20 최인영; 김윤희; 문성배 대한화학회지 2001, 45(2), 162.
21 김윤희; 문성배 한국과학교육학회지 2000, 20(2), 274.
22 Piel, E. J. What Research Say to the Science Teacher; Washington D.C, National Science Teachers Association, 1981.
23 최경희 한국과학교육학회지 1994, 14(2), 192.
24 Bybee, R. W. Science Education 1987, 71(5), 667.   DOI
25 NSTA An NSTA Position Statement, NSTA; Washington, D.C., 1982.