Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.10.2934

Comparison of Enantioselective CEC Separation of OT-MIP Capillary Columns with Templates of Various Camphor Derivatives Made by the Pre-established General Preparation Protocol  

Zaidi, Shabi Abbas (Department of Chemistry, Nano Fine Center, and Institute of Basic Research, Inha University)
Lee, Seung-Mi (Department of Chemistry, Nano Fine Center, and Institute of Basic Research, Inha University)
Lee, Ju-Young (Department of Chemistry, Nano Fine Center, and Institute of Basic Research, Inha University)
Cheong, Won-Jo (Department of Chemistry, Nano Fine Center, and Institute of Basic Research, Inha University)
Publication Information
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society / v.31, no.10, 2010 , pp. 2934-2938 More about this Journal
Abstract
Some open tubular (OT) molecule imprinted polymer (MIP) silica capillary columns with templates of camphor derivatives such as 10-camphorsulfonic acid (10-CSA), 10-camphorsulfonamide (10-CS) and camphor-p-tosyl hydrazone (CTH) have been successfully prepared by the prior generalized preparation protocol. The three MIP thin layers of different templates showed quite different morphologies. The chiral selectivity of each MIP column for the template enantiomers was optimized by changing eluent composition and pH. The optimization conditions were found to be different for the three MIPs. This work suggests prospective successful extension of the generalized preparation protocol for OT-MIP silica capillary columns toward templates of a variety of chemical groups.
Keywords
Camphor derivatives; Chiral separation; Molecule imprinted polymer; Generalized preparation protocol; Morphology;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 2  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 3
연도 인용수 순위
1 Vlatakis, G.; Andersson, L. I.; Muller, R.; Mosbach, K. Nature 1993, 361, 645-647.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Klein, J. U.; Whitecombe, M. J.; Mulhollard, F.; Vulfson, E. N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2057-2060.   DOI
3 Zaidi, S. A.; Cheong, W. J. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 2947-2952.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Wulff, G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1812-1832.   DOI
5 Sellergren, B.; Shea, K. J. J. Chromatogr. A 1993, 635, 31-49.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Schweitz, L.; Andersson, L. I.; Nilsson, S. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 817, 5-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Vallano, P. T.; Remcho, V. T. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 887, 125-135.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Zaidi, S. A.; Han, K. M.; Kim, S. S.; Hwang, D. G.; Cheong, W. J. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 996-1001.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Nilsson. S.; Schweitz, L.; Petersson, M. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 884-890.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Zaidi, S. A.; Cheong, W. J. Electrophoresis 2009, 30, 1603-1607.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Zaidi, S. A.; Han, K. M.; Hwang, D. G.; Cheong, W. J. Electrophoresis 2010, 31, 1-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Gonzalez, G. P.; Hernando, P. F.; Algeria, J. S. D. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 557, 179-183.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 The Merck index, An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs and Biologicals, 12th ed.; 1996; Merck Research Laboratories, Division of Merck & Co., Inc.: NJ.
14 Park, J. H.; Ryu, J. K.; Park, J. K.; Mcneff, C. V.; Carr, P. W. Chromatographia 2001, 58, 405-408.
15 Kagan, M.; Chlenov, M.; Greenfield, A.; Ho, D. M. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1120, 82-88.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Xu, Y. L.; Liu, Z. S.; Wang, H. F.; Yan, C.; Gao, R. Y. Electrophoresis 2005, 26, 804-811.   DOI   ScienceOn