Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2008.29.5.979

Study of Retention in Micellar Liquid Chromatography on a C18 Column on the Basis of Linear Solvation Energy Relationships  

Tian, Minglei (Center for Advanced Bioseparation Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Inha University)
Row, Kyung-Ho (Center for Advanced Bioseparation Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Inha University)
Publication Information
Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society / v.29, no.5, 2008 , pp. 979-984 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, 8 solutes (aniline, caffeine, p-cresol, ethyl benzene, methylparaben, phenol, pyridine, and toluene) have been tested in terms of linear solvation energy relationships (LSER). Several micellar liquid chromatography (MLC) systems using cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and a mixture of water with (methanol, n-propanol, and n-butanol) modifiers were characterized using the LSER solvation parameter model. The effects of the surfactant and modifier concentration on the retention in MLC were discussed. LSER model had demonstrated high potential to predict retention factors with high squared correlation coefficients ($r^2$ > 0.99). A comparison of predicted and experimental retention factors suggests that LSER formalism is able to reproduce adequately the experimental retention factors of the solutes studied in the different experimental conditions investigated. This model is a helpful tool to understand the solute-surfactant interactions and evaluate the retention characteristic of micellar liquid chromatography.
Keywords
Micellar liquid chromatography; Linear solvation energy relationships (LSER); Chromatographic retention; Surfactant; Modifier
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 2  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 McGowan, J. C.; Abraham, M. H. Chromatographia 1987, 23, 243   DOI
2 Smith, T. J.; Stevenson, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3669   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Marcus, Y.; Taft, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 5244   DOI
4 Chen, N.; Zhang, Y.; Terabe, S.; Nakagawa, T. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 678, 327   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Yang, S.; Khaledi, M. G. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 499
6 Carr, P. W.; Doherty, R. M.; Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W.; Malender, W.; Horvath, Cs. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 2674   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Carr, P. W. Microchem. J. 1993, 48, 4   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Basova, E. M.; Ivanov, V. M.; Shpigun, O. A. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1999, 68, 983   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Esteve-Romero, J.; Carda-Broch, S.; Gil-Agusti, M.; Capella-Peiro, M. E.; Bose, D. TRAC-Trends in Anal. Chem. 2005, 24(2), 75   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hernández, M. J. M.; Alvarez-coque, M. C. G. The Analyst 1992, 117(55), 831   DOI
11 Berthod, A.; Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, C. Micellar Liquid Chromatography, 1st ed.; CRC: 2000
12 Abraham, M. H.; Whiting, G. S.; Doherty, R. M.; Shuely, W. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1990, 2, 1451
13 Abraham, M. H.; Chadha, H. S.; Whiting, G. S.; Mitchell, R. C. J. Pharm. Sci. 1994, 83, 1085   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 2886   DOI
15 Marina, M. L.; García, M. A. Micellar Liquid Chromatography; Academic Press Ltd: England, 2000
16 Poole, C. F. The Essence of Chromatography, 1st ed.; Elsevier Science: 2000
17 Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 377   DOI
18 Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J. L.; Taft, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6027   DOI
19 Armstrong, D. W.; Henry, S. J. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1980, 3, 657   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Armstrong, D. W.; Nome, F. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53, 1662   DOI
21 Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J. L.; Taft, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2877   DOI