Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2006.27.4.568

Crystal Structures of the Two Isomorphous A-DNA Decamers d(GTACGCGTAC) and d(GGCCGCGGCC)  

Kim, Tae-gyun (Department of Chemistry and Division of Molecular and Life Sciences (BK21), Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Kwon, Taek-Hun (Department of Chemistry and Division of Molecular and Life Sciences (BK21), Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Jung, Hye-sun (Department of Chemistry and Division of Molecular and Life Sciences (BK21), Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Ku, Ja-Kang (Department of Chemistry and Division of Molecular and Life Sciences (BK21), Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Sundaralingam, Muttaiya (Department of Chemistry, The Ohio State University)
Ban, Chang-ill (Department of Chemistry and Division of Molecular and Life Sciences (BK21), Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Abstract
To study the effect of sequence on DNA structure, the two decamer crystal structures one alternating,d(GTACGCGTAC), and the other non-alternating, d(GGCCGCGGCC), were solved. Crystals of both decamers belong to the hexagonal space group $P6_122$, with one strand in the asymmetric unit. The unit cell constants of the alternating decamer are a = b = 39.26 $\AA$, c = 77.70 $\AA$. The structure was refined with 1,828 reflections from 8.0 to 2.0 Aresolution to an R value of 21.3% with all DNA atoms and 63 water molecules. The isomorphous non-alternating decamer had unit cell dimensions of a = b = 39.05 $\AA$, c = 82.15 $\AA$. The structure was refined with 2,423 reflections from 8.0 to 2.0 $\AA$ resolution to a final R value of 22.2% for all DNA atoms and 65 water molecules. Although the average helical parameters of the decamers are typical of A-DNAs, there are some minor differences between them. The helical twist, rise, x-displacement, inclination and roll alternate in the alternating decamer, but do not in the non-alternating decamer. The backbone conformations in both structures show some differences; the residue G(7) of the alternating decamer is trans for $\alpha$ and $\gamma$ while the trans conformations are observed at the residue G(8) of the non-alternating decamer.
Keywords
X-Ray crystallography; A-DNA decamer; Conformational flexibility; Helical parameter;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mooers, B. H. M.; Schroth, G. P.; Baxter, W. W.; Ho, P. S. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 249, 772   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Dickerson, R. E.; Googsell, D. S.; Neidle, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994, 91, 3579   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lipanov, A.; Kopka, M. L.; Kaczor-Grzeskowiak, M.; Quintana, J.; Dickerson, R. E. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 1373   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Shakked, Z.; Guerstein-Guzikevich, G.; Frolow, F.; Rabinovich, D. Nature 1988, 342, 456
5 Ramakrishnan, B.; Sundaralingam M. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 11458   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Bingman, C.; Jain, S.; Zon, G.; Sundaralingam, M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 6637   DOI
7 Frederick, C. A.; Quigley, G. J.; Teng, M.-K.; Coll, M.; van der Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. H.; Rich, A.; Wang, A. H.-J. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989, 181, 295   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Brunger, A. T.; Adams, P. D.; Clore, G. M.; DeLano, W. L.; Gros, P.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W.; Jiang, J.-S.; Kuszewski, J.; Nilges, M.; Pannu, N. S.; Read, R. J.; Rice, L. M.; Simonson, T.; Warren, G. L. Acta Cryst. 1998, D54, 905
9 Berman, M. H.; Olson, W. K.; Beveridge, D.; Westbrook, J.; Gelbin, A.; Demeny, T.; Hsieh, S.; Srinvasan, A. R.; Schneider, B. Biophysical J. 1992, 63, 751   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Jain, S.; Zon, G.; Sundaralingam, M. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 3567   DOI
11 Ban, C.; Sundaralingam, M. Biophysical J. 1996, 71, 1222   DOI   ScienceOn