Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2005.26.2.297

Determination of Total Phenols in Environmental Waters by Capillary-HPLC with U.S.E.P.A. Classified Eleven Priority Pollutant Phenols after Nitrosation and Their Visible Spectrophotometric Detection  

Chung, Yong-Soon (Department of Chemistry, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The determination of total phenols was accomplished by capillary-high performance liquid chromatography (capillary-HPLC) after nitrosation of the U.S.E.P.A. classified 11 priority pollutant phenols, using the nitrosated parent phenol (POHNO) as a reference for calibration. The optimum mobile phase composition for this analysis was found by examining the effect of changing the percentage of acetonitrile (MeCN) in the mobile phase on retention factors (k values) and peak intensities. As MeCN percentage was increased, k values were reduced and peak intensities were generally increased. From the results obtained, it was found that the optimum mobile phase was 90%(v/v) MeCN solution at pH 8.0, the detection wavelength of 400 nm, and a detection limit (D.L., concentration at signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 3.0) of 4.5 ${\times}$ $10^{-7}$ M. In addition, 10 of the 11 phenols present in mineral or waste water were separated after the nitrosation by capillary-HPLC. The optimum mobile phase for separation was a 40%(v/v) MeCN solution at pH 5.0.
Keywords
Capillary-HPLC; 11 Priority pollutant phenols; Nitrosation; Total phenols;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cremlyn, R. Pesticides: Preparation and Mode of Action; Wiley: Chichester, 1978
2 Lindstrom, K.; Nordin, J. J. Chromatogr. 1976, 128, 13   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Abrahamsson, K.; Xie, T. M. J. Chromatogr. 1983, 279, 199   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Drinking Water Directive 80/778/EEC; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, 1980
5 American Public Health Association: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water, 16th ed.; Washington, D.C., 1985; part 510
6 Koppe, P.; Dietz, F.; Traud, J.; Robelt, C. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1977, 285, 1   DOI
7 Frenzel, W.; Oleksy-Frenzel, J. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 261, 253   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Masque, N.; Pocurull, E.; Marce, R. M.; Borrull, F. Chromatographia 1998, 47(3/4), 176   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ruana, J.; Urbe, I.; Borrull, F. J. Chromatogr. A 1993, 655, 217   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Chung, Y.; Lee, S.; Motomizu, S. Anal. Sci. & Tech. 2004, 17(6), 393
11 Chung, Y.; Lee, K. Microchem. J. 2001, 69, 143
12 Chung, Y.; Chung, W. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2003, 24(12), 1781   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chung, Y.; Kim, B.; Hwang, J.; Kim, C. S. Microchem. J. 1999, 62, 336   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Martinez, D.; Pocurull, E.; Marce, R. M.; Borrull, F.; Calull, M. Chromatographia 1996, 43(11-12), 619   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Bigley, F. P.; Grob, R. L. J. Chromatogr. 1985, 350(2), 407   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Zhao, C.; Song, J.; Zhang, J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374, 498   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Screening of Industrial Effluents for Priority Pollutants, U.S.E.P.A.; Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory: Cincinnatti, OH, 1977
18 Pulg, D.; Silgoner, I.; Grasserbauer, M.; Barcel, D. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2756   DOI   ScienceOn