Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2003.24.3.279

Parameter Estimation of Single and Decentralized Control Systems Using Pulse Response Data  

Cheres, Eduard (Planning Development and Technology Division, The Israel Electric Corp. Ltd.)
Podshivalov, Lev (Planning Development and Technology Division, The Israel Electric Corp. Ltd.)
Publication Information
Abstract
The One Pass Method (OPM) previously presented for the identification of single input single output systems is used to estimate the parameters of a Decentralized Control System (DCS). The OPM is a linear and therefore a simple estimation method. All of the calculations are performed in one pass, and no initial parameter guess, iteration, or powerful search methods are required. These features are of interest especially when the parameters of multi input-output model are estimated. The benefits of the OPM are revealed by comparing its results against those of two recently published methods based on pulse testing. The comparison is performed using two databases from the literature. These databases include single and multi input-output process transfer functions and relevant disturbances. The closed loop responses of these processes are roughly captured by the previous methods, whereas the OPM gives much more accurate results. If the parameters of a DCS are estimated, the OPM yields the same results in multi or single structure implementation. This is a novel feature, which indicates that the OPM is a convenient and practice method for the parameter estimation of multivariable DCSs.
Keywords
Parameter estimation; Time delay; Least squares estimation; Linear algorithm; Decentralized control system;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Huang, C.-T.; Chau, C.-J.; Wang, J.-L. J. Chinese Inst. Chem. 1996, 27, 107.
2 Schoukens, J.; Pintelon, R. Identification of Linear Systems; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; p 55.
3 Cheres, E.; Eydelzon, A. Process Contr. and Quality 1999, 11, 301.   DOI
4 Grace, A. Optimization Toolbox for Use with MATLAB; The MathWorks Inc.: Natick, U.S.A, 1994; pp 3-16.
5 Li, W.; Lee, J. H. AIChE J. 1996, 42, 2813.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cheres, E.; Eydelzon, A. Process Contr. and Quality 1999, 11, 307.   DOI
7 Ham, T. W.; Kim, Y. H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 482.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Astrom, K. J. Int. J. of Adaptive Contr. and Signal Processing 1991, 5, 3.   DOI
9 Rivera, D. E.; Jun, K. S. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 2000, 20, 25.
10 Cheres, E.; Eydelzon, A. Proc. of the Eight. IASTED Int. Conf. Modelling Ident. and Contr.; ACTA Press: Calgary, Canada, 1999; p 483.
11 Ham, T. W.; Kim, Y. H. J. Chem. Eng. of Japan 1998, 31, 941.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Lauzi, M. Proc. of the IEMDC '99 1999, 460.
13 Ferretti, G.; Maffezzoni, C.; Scattolini, R. Automatica 1996, 449.
14 Luyben, W. L. Process Modeling Simulation, and Control for Chemical Engineers; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1990; p 505.