Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2002.23.9.1263

The Effect of Medium on the α -Effect: Nucleophilic Substitution Reaction of p-Nitrothenyl Diphenyl Phosphinate with Butane-2,3-dione Monoximate and Substituted Phenoxides in Cationic Micelles  

Limb, Jin-Kyung
Jeon, Sang-Eun
Lee, Seung-Eun
Um, Ik-Hwan
Publication Information
Abstract
Pseudo-first-order rate constants (kobs) have been determined for the nucleophilic substitution reactions of p-nitrophenyl diphenyl phosphinate (PNPDPP) with substituted phenoxides (XC6H4O - ) and butane-2,3-dione monoximate (Ox- ) in 0.1 M borate buffer (pH = 10.0) at 25.0 ${\pm}0.1^{\circ}C$. The kobs value increases sharply upon addition of cethyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) to the reaction medium up to near 7 ${\times}$ 10-4 M CTAB and then decreases smoothly upon further addition of CTAB. The rate enhancement upon the addition of CTAB is most significant for the reaction with -O2CC6H4O- and least significant for the one with C6H5O- , indicating that the reactivity of these aryloxides in the presence of CTAB cannot be determined by the basicity alone. The strength of the interaction of these anionic aryloxides with the positively charged micellar aggregates has been suggested to be an important factor to determine the reactivity in the presence of CTAB. The kobs value for the reaction with Ox- increases also upon the addition of CTAB. However, the increase in the kobs value is much more significant for the reaction with Ox- than for the one with ClC6H4O- , indicating that Ox- is less strongly solvated than ClC6H4O- in H2O. The ${\alpha}-effect$ shown by Ox- in H2O has been attributed to the ground-state solvation difference between Ox- and ClC6H4O- .
Keywords
The $\alpha$-effect,Micellar effect,Basicity,Mucleophiliity,BrØnsted squation;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 2  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 3
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bernasconi, C. F.; Murray, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5251.   DOI
2 Um, I. H.; Buncel, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11111.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Herschlag, D.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1951.   DOI
4 Fendler, J. H.; Fendler, E. J. Catalysis in Micellar and Macromolecular Sustems; Academic Press: New York, 1975.
5 Um, I. H.; Buncel, E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 577.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Um, I. H.; Lee, S. E.; Jung, J. K.; Park. J. Y. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1992, 13, 486.
7 Um, I. H.; Hong, J. Y.; Buncel, E. Chem. Commun. 2001, 27.
8 Buncel, E.; Um, I. H. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1986, 595.
9 Dixon, J. E.; Bruice, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 2052.   DOI
10 Edwards, J. O.; Pearson, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 16.   DOI
11 Um, I. H.; Lee, E. J.; Buncel, E. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4859.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Iglasias, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 10287.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Moss, R. A.; Kotchevar, A. T.; Park, B. D.; Scrimin, P. Langmuir 1996, 12, 2200.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Palling, D. J.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4869.   DOI
15 Moutiers, G.; Guevel, E. L.; Vilien, L.; Terrier, F. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 7.
16 Grekov, A. P.; Veselov, V. Y. Usp. Khim. 1978, 47, 1200.
17 Fina, N. J.; Edward, J. O. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1973, 5, 1.   DOI
18 Buncel, E.; Hoz, S. Isr. J. Chem. 1985, 26, 313.   DOI
19 Bunton, C. A.; Sepulveda, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 680.   DOI
20 Terrier, F.; Moutiers, G.; Xiao, L.; Guir, F. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1748.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Fountain, K. R.; Tad-y, D. B.; Paul, T. W.; Golynskiy, M. V. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6547.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Fountain, K. R.; Dunkin, T. W.; Patel, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 3711.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Fountain, K. R.; Patel, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4795.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Herschlag, D.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 7579.   DOI
25 Um, I. H.; Park, Y. M.; Buncel, E. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1917.
26 Um, I. H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1990, 11, 173.
27 Toullec, J.; Moukawim, M. Chem. Commun. 1996, 221.