Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2002.23.8.1097

GC-MS/Ms Analysis of Benzo(a)pyrene by Ion Trap Tandem Mass Spectrometry  

Nam, Jae-Jak
Lee, Sang-Hak
Publication Information
Abstract
The mass spectrometry using an ion trap tandem mass spectrometer has been investigated to find optimum conditions for the analysis of benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-benzpyrene). The applicability to a real soil sample was also investigated to verify the usef ulness of the MS/MS (or collision induced dissociation, CID) analysis. The optimum CID condition was 1.5 and 0.45 for the RF excitation voltage and the q value, respectively. For comparison, CID and EI were applied to the analysis of a soil sample. CID analysis was more sensitive than EI analysis of the soil sample. The limit of detection (LOD) of benzo(a)pyrene was 3.18 ng mL-1 and 0.85 ng mL,-1 for EI and MS/MS analysis, respectively. The precision at the soil sample for EI and CID showed relative standard deviations of 6.1% and 4.1%, respectively, and the concentrations were 168 ㎍ kg-1 and 162 ㎍ kg-1 , respectively.
Keywords
PAHs; Benzo(a)pyrene; Ino trap mass spectrometry; CID; MS/MS;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 7  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 7
연도 인용수 순위
1 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Analytical Methods forRegulated Drinking Water Contaminations, Final Rule; EPA,Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water: Washington, D.C.,1994.
2 Sauer, T.; Boehm, P. The Use of Defensible Analytical ChemicalMeasurements for Oil Spill Natural Resource Damage Assessment;Proceedings of Oil Spill Conference, 1991; pp 363-369.
3 Warzecha, L. J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 1996, 19, 639.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Pyle, S. M.; Betowski, L. D.; Marcus, A. B.; Winnik, W.; Brittain, R. D. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 8, 183.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; ATSDR:Atlanta, GA, 1995; p 458.
6 National Library of Medicine. Hazardous Substance Data Bank(HSDB) CD-ROM Database; Micromedex Inc.: Denver, CO.,1988.
7 Abraham, V. M.; Lynn, Jr., B. C. J. of Chromatography A 1997,790, 131.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Thomson, B. A.; Douglas, D. J.; Hager, J. W.; Jolliffe, C. L. Anal.Chem. 1995, 67, 1696.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bowers, L. D.; Borts, D. J. Journal of Chromatography B 1996,687, 69.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Wang, M.; Schachterle, S.; Well, G. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.1996, 7, 668.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Knoll, J. E. J. of Chromatographic Science 1985, 23, 422.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Long, G. L.; Winefordner, J. D. Analytical Chemistry 1983, 55,713A.   DOI
13 Greenburg, A.; Hsu, C.; Rothman, N.; Strickland, P. T. PolycyclicAromatic Compounds 1993, 3, 101.   DOI
14 Nondek, L.; Kuzilek, M.; Krupicka, S. Chromatophia 1993, 37,381.
15 Zamperlini, G. C. M.; Silva, M. R.; Vilegas, W. Chromatographia1997, 46, 655.   DOI
16 Jonscher, K. R.; Yates, III, J. R. Analytical Biochemistry 1997,244, 1.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Mosi, A. A.; Reimer, K. J.; Eigendorf, G. K. Talanta 1997, 44,985.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Test Methods for EvaluatingSolid Waste, Physical/Chemical methods, SW-846; EPA, Officeof Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, D.C.,1997.
19 Ding, W. H.; Tzing, S. H. J. of Chromatography A 1998, 824,79.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Quarmby, S.; Guckenberger, B. Content of the Help File inXcalibur 1.2; Johns, K., Ed.; Technical Publications: Austin, TX.,2001.
21 Suess, M. J. The Science of the Total Environment 1976, 6, 239.   DOI   ScienceOn