Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2013.22.1.145

The relationship between the habits of a currently used system and the acceptance of a new system  

Lee, Woong-Kyu (Department of Business Administration, Daegu University)
Kim, Hyo-Jung (Keymyung University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Information Systems / v.22, no.1, 2013 , pp. 145-163 More about this Journal
Keywords
habit; IT adoption or acceptance; experience; switching cost;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, G., Shin, B. and Lee, H. G., "A Study of Factors that Affect User Intentions toward email Service Switching". Information & Management", 43, 2006, pp. 884-993.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Kim, S. S., "The Integrative Framework of Technology Use: an Extension and Test", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2009, pp. 513-537.
3 Kim, S. S. and Malhotra, N. K., "A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: an Integrative View of Four Mechanisms underlying Postadoption Phenomena". Management Science, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2005, pp. 741-755.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lee, W-K., "The Dual Effect of Habits in a Current Used System on the Acceptance of a New IT", in Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Information Resource Management, August 2-6, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
5 Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W., "Inexperience and Experience with Online Stores: The Importance of TAM and Trust", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2003, pp. 307-321.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Gefen, D. and Straub, D. B., "A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example", Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2005, pp. 91-109.
7 Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J., "The Effect of Self-efficacy on Computer Usage", Omega, Vol. 23, No. 6, 1995, pp. 587-605.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., and Beatty, S. E., "Why customers stay: Measuring the Underlying Dimensions of Services Switching Costs and Managing their Differential Strategic Outcomes", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, 2002, pp. 441-450.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W. and Chervany, N. L., "Information Technology Adoption across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1999, pp. 183-213.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kim, H-W. and Kankanhalli, A.,"Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2009, pp. 567-582.
11 Verplanken, B. and Orbell, S., "Reflection on Past Behavior: A Self-Report Index of Habit Strength", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1313-1330.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Azjen, I., "The Theory of Planned Behavior", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, 1991, pp. 179-211   DOI
13 Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., and Xu, X., "Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, No.1, 2012, pp. 157-178
14 Verplanken, B., "Beyond Frequency: Habit as Mental Construct", British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 45, 2006, pp. 639-656.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., Chan, F. K. Y., Hu, P. J-H., and Brown, S. A., "Extending the Two-Stage Information Systems Continuance Model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the Role of Context", Information Systems Journal, Vol. 21, 2011, pp. 527-555.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Bhattacherjee, A., "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: an Expectation- Confirmation Model", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2001, pp. 351-370.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Bhattacherjee, A. and Barfa, A., "Information Technology Continuance Research: Current State and Future Directions", Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2011, pp. 1-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Bhattacherjee, A. and Premkumar, G., "Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 2004, 229-254,
19 Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-340.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R., "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: a Comparison of Two Theoretical Models", Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, 1989, pp. 982-1003.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Davis, F. D. and Venkatesh, V., "Toward Preprototype User Acceptance Testing of New Information Systems: Implications for Software Project Management", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2004, pp. 31-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Falk, R. F. and Miller, N. B. , Primer for Soft Modeling, University of Akron Press, 1st edition, 1992,
23 Fazio, R. H. and Zanna, M. P., "Direct Experience and Attitude-Behavior Consistency", In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Berkowitz L, Eds), Vol. 14, 1981, pp. 161-202.
24 Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. Belief, Predicting and Changing Behavior -The Reasoned Action Approach, NY: Psychology Press, NY., 2010.
25 Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading. Addison-Wesley, MA., 1975.
26 Limayem, M, Hirt, S. G. and Cheung, C. M. K., "How Habit Limits th Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2007, pp. 705-737.
27 Myers, D. G., Psychology (eighth edition), Worth Publishers, NY., 2007.
28 Oritz de Guinea, A. and Markus, M. L.,"Why Break the Habit of a Lifetime? Rethininking the Roles of Intention, Habit, and Emotion in Continuing Information Technology Use", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2009, pp. 433-444.
29 Ouellette, J. and Wood, W., "Habit and Intention in Everyday Life: the Multiple Processes by which Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124, No. 1, 1998, pp. 54-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Ray, S., Kim, S. S., and Morris, J. G., "Online Users' Switching Costs: Their Nature and Formation", Information Systems Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2012, pp. 197-213.   DOI
31 Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. R., Information Rules, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA., 1999.
32 Szajna, B., " Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model", Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1996, pp. 85-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A., "Assessing IT Usage: the Role of Prior Experience", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1995, pp. 561-570.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Triandis, H. C., "Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior", In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values, (Page MM, Eds), pp, 195-25, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE., 1980.
35 Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D., "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies", Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2000, pp. 186-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D., "User Acceptance of Information Technology : Toward A Unified View", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 425-478.