1 |
van Raan A. (2019). Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics. In: Glanzel W., Moed H. F., Schmoch U., Thelwall M. (eds), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_10
DOI
|
2 |
Zhao, D. & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20910
DOI
|
3 |
Byun, Ji-Hye & Chung, Eun-Kyung (2011). Domain analysis on electrical engineering in Korea by author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(4), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.4.075
DOI
|
4 |
Choi, Ye-Jin & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2016). A study on the intellectual structure of metadata research by using co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(3), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.063
DOI
|
5 |
Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
DOI
|
6 |
Kim, Sun-Kyum, Kim, Wan-Jong, Seo, Tae-Sul, & Choi, Hyun-Jin Choi (2019). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis: based on published journals of library and information science during 2013 to 2018. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 333-356. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.333
DOI
|
7 |
Chung, Eunkyung (2021). An investigation on digital humanities research trend by analyzing the papers of Digital Humanities Conferences. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 393-413. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.393
DOI
|
8 |
Choi, Hyung Wook, Choi, Ye Jin, & Nam, So-Yeon (2018). Time series analysis of intellectual structure and research trend changes in the field of library and information science: 2003 to 2017. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2), 89-114. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.08
DOI
|
9 |
Kang, Beomil & Park, Ji-Hong (2013). Profiling and co-word analysis of teaching Korean as a foreign language domain. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 195-213. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.195
DOI
|
10 |
Kim, Heejeon & Cho, Hyun Yang (2010). A study on intellectual structure using author co-citation analysis and author bibliographic coupling analysis in the field of social welfare science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3), 283-306. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.283
DOI
|
11 |
Lee, Jae Yun (2021). Considerations on some decision criteria in the intellectual structure analysis process. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Korean Society for Information Management, 91-100.
|
12 |
Lee, Ji-Won (2019). A study on analysis of research trends and intellectual structure of cataloging field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(4), 279-300. http://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.pub.36.4.279001
DOI
|
13 |
Park, SeonHee, Kang, ChangWook, & Yang, HyunKieu (2017). An analysis on the intellectual structure of studies related to the hearing impairments in Korea: focusing on co-word analysis. Journal of Special Education, 24(1), 167-187. http://doi.org/10.34249/jse.2017.24.1.167
DOI
|
14 |
Choi, Hyung Wook & Chung, Eunkyung (2017). An investigation on characteristics and intellectual structure of sociology by analyzing cited data. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 109-124. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.109
DOI
|
15 |
Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus Pub.
|
16 |
Lee, Jae Yun (2006a). Towards a new method for examining current domestic intellectual structure of knowledge domains. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Korean Society for Information Management, 145-152.
|
17 |
Lee, Jae Yun (2013). A comparison study on the weighted network centrality measures of tnet and WNET. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 241-264. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.241
DOI
|
18 |
Shin, You Mi & Park, Oknam (2019). An analytical study on research trends of collection development and management. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(2), 105-131. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.2.105
DOI
|
19 |
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2).
|
20 |
He, J., Lou, W., & Li, K. (2019). How were science mapping tools applied? the application of science mapping tools in LIS and non-LIS domains. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 56(1), 404-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.38
DOI
|
21 |
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
DOI
|
22 |
Park, Ji Yeon & Jeong, Dong Youl (2013). A study on the Intellectual structure of library and information science in Korea by author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 31-59. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.031
DOI
|
23 |
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386
DOI
|
24 |
Ronda-Pupo, G. A. & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2012). Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962-2008: a co-word analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 162-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.948
DOI
|
25 |
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406.
DOI
|
26 |
Seo, SunKyung & Chung, EunKyung (2013). Domain analysis on the field of open access by co-word analysis. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(1), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.1.207
DOI
|
27 |
Zhang, Ling Ling & Hong, Hyun Jin (2014). Examining the intellectual structure of reading studies with co-word analysis based on the importance of journals and sequence of keywords. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(1), 295-318. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.295
DOI
|
28 |
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
DOI
|
29 |
Lee, Jae Yun (2008). Bibliographic author coupling analysis: a new methodological approach for identifying research trends. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(1), 173-190. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.1.173
DOI
|
30 |
Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., ... & Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
DOI
|
31 |
Parasie, S. & Dagiral, E. (2013). Data-driven journalism and the public good: "computer-assistedreporters" and "programmer-journalists" in Chicago. New Media & Society, 15(6), 853-871. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812463345
DOI
|
32 |
Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
|
33 |
Cortes, C. & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022627411411
DOI
|
34 |
Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? a comparative study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 682-703. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35097
DOI
|
35 |
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
DOI
|
36 |
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103.
DOI
|
37 |
Nativi, S., Craglia, M., & Pearlman, J. (2012). The brokering approach for multidisciplinary interoperability: a position paper. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 7, 1-15. Available: https://ijsdir.sadl.kuleuven.be/index.php/ijsdir/article/view/281
|
38 |
Small, H. G. (1976). Structural dynamics of scientific literature. International Classification, 3(2), 67-74.
|
39 |
White, H. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
DOI
|
40 |
van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing Data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9(86), 2579-2605. Available: https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v9/vandermaaten08a.html
|
41 |
Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked Data. Available: https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
|
42 |
Lee, Jae Yun (2006b). A novel clustering method for examining and analyzing the intellectual structure of a scholarly field. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(4), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.4.215
DOI
|
43 |
Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
DOI
|