1 |
Robinson-Garcia, N., Jimenez-Contreras, E., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2015). Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 2964-2975. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23529
DOI
|
2 |
Socias, S. M., Morin, A., Tomony, M. A., & Sliz, P. (2015). AppCiter: a web application for increasing rates and accuracy of scientific software citation. Structure, 23(5), 807-808. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2015.04.005
DOI
|
3 |
Park, H. & Wolfram, D. (2017). An examination of research data sharing and re-use: implications for data citation practice. Scientometrics, 111(1), 443-461. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2240-2
DOI
|
4 |
Jones, M. B., Boettiger, C., Mayes, A. C., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., Gil, Y., Fenner, M., Nowak, K., Hahnel, M., Coy, L., Allen, A., Crosas, M., Sands, A., Chue Hong, N., Cruse, P., Katz, D. S., & Goble, C. (2017). CodeMeta. KNB Data Repository. http://doi.org/10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0
DOI
|
5 |
Morisio, M., Ezran, M., & Tully, C. (2002). Success and failure factors in software reuse. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 28(4), 340-357. http://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2002.995420
DOI
|
6 |
Druskat, S., Spaaks, J. H., Chue Hong, N., Haines, R., & Baker, J. (2019). Citation file format (CFF) - specifications. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515946
DOI
|
7 |
Kats, D. S., Bouquin, D., Chue Hong, N. P., Hausman, J., Jones, C., Chivvis, D., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Druskat, S., Fenner, M., Gillespie, T., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Gruenpeter, M., Habermann, T., Haines, R., Harrison, M., Henneken, E., Hwang, L., Jones, M. B., Alastair, J., Kelly A. A., Kennedy, D. N., Leinweber, K., Rois, F., Robinson, C. B., Todorov, I., Wu, M., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Software citation implementation challenges. Available: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1905/1905.08674.pdf
|
8 |
Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE, 2(3), e308. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
DOI
|
9 |
SciCodes Consortium (2021). SCICODES: consortium of scientific registries and repositories. Available: https://scicodes.net/2021/04/09/welcome-to-scicodes
|
10 |
Smith, A. M., Katz, D. S., Niemeyer, K. E., & FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group. (2016). Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2(e86). http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86
DOI
|
11 |
Springer Nature. [n.d.]. Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols. Available: https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/reporting-standards
|
12 |
Yang, B., Huang, S., Wang, X., & Rousseau, R. (2018). How important is scientific software in bioinformatics research? A comparative study between international and Chinese research communities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24031
DOI
|
13 |
Park, H. & Wolfram, D. (2019). Research software citation in the Data Citation Index: current practices and implications for research software sharing and reuse. Journal of Informetrics, 13, 574-582. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.005
DOI
|
14 |
Ajiferuke, I., Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2010). A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2086-2096. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21383
DOI
|
15 |
Allen, A. (2021). Citation method, please? A case study in astrophysics. arXiv. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.12574.pdf
|
16 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (2016). Science journals: editorial policies. Available: https://www.science.org/content/page/sciencejournalseditorialpolicies#research-standards
|
17 |
Astrophysics Source Code Library. [n.d.]. Welcome to the ASCL. Available: https://ascl.net
|
18 |
Bassett, P. G. (1997). Framing Software Reuse: Lessons from the Real World. Upper Saddle River: Yourdon Press.
|
19 |
Bietz, M. J., Baumer, E. P. S., & Lee, C. P. (2020). Synergizing in cyberinfrastructure development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19, 245-281. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010-9114-y
DOI
|
20 |
Clarivate Analytics (2020). Data Citation Index help. Available: http://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS517B4/help/DRCI/index.html
|
21 |
Clarivate Analytics (2021). Data Citation Index. Available: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/webofscience-data-citation-index
|
22 |
Du, C., Cohoon, J., Lopez, P., & Howison, J. (2021). Softcite dataset: a dataset of software mentions in biomedical and economic research publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24454
DOI
|
23 |
Garcia, F., Bertoa, M. F., Calero, C., Vallecillo, A., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M., & Genero, M. (2006). Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement. Information and Software Technology, 48(8), 631-644. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2005.07.001
DOI
|
24 |
Hannay, J. E., MacLeod, C., Singer, J., Langtangen, H. P., Pfahl, D., & Wilson, G. (2009). How do scientists develop and use scientific software? 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Computational Science and Engineering. Vancouver: IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/SECSE.2009.5069155
DOI
|
25 |
He, N. & Nahar, V. (2016). Reuse of scientific data in academic publications: an investigation of Dryad digital repository. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(4), 478-494. http://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2016-0008
DOI
|
26 |
Henry, V., Bandrowski, A. E., Pepin, A.-S., Gonzalez, B. J., & Desfeux, A. (2014). OMICtools: an informative directory for multi-omic data analysis. Database, 2014, 1-5. http://doi.org/10.1093/database/bau069
DOI
|
27 |
FAIR for Research Software Working Group (2021). FAIR for research software (FAIR4RS) WG. Available: https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/fair-4-research-software-fair4rs-wg
|
28 |
Howison, J. & Herbsleb, J. D. (2011). Scientific software production: incentives and collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 513-522. http://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958904
DOI
|
29 |
Hwang, L., Pauloo, R., & Carlen, J. (2020). Assessing the impact of outreach through software citation for community software in geodynamics. Computing in Science & Engineering, 22(1), 16-25. http://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2940221
DOI
|
30 |
Keswani, R., Joshi, S., & Jatain, A. (2014). Software reuse in practice. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies, 159-162. http://doi.org/10.1109/Acct.2014.57
DOI
|
31 |
American Astronomical Society (2016). Policy statement on software. Available: https://journals.aas.org/news/policy-statement-on-software
|
32 |
Lu, K., Ajiferuke, I., & Wolfram, D. (2014). Extending citer analysis to journal impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 100(1), 245-260. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1274-y
DOI
|
33 |
Makitalo, N., Taivalsaari, A., Kiviluoto, A., & Capilla, R. (2020). On opportunistic software reuse. Computing, 102, 2385-2408. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00833-6.
DOI
|
34 |
Nangia, U. & Katz, D. S. (2017). Track 1 paper: surveying the U.S. national postdoctoral association regarding software use and training in research. Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.814220
DOI
|
35 |
Pan, X., Yan, E., Cui, M., & Hua, W. (2018). Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: a comparative study of three tools. Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 481-493. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.005
DOI
|
36 |
Pan, X., Yan, E., Wang, Q., & Hua, W. (2015). Assessing the impact of software on science: a bootstrapped learning of software entities in full-text papers. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 860-871. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.012
DOI
|
37 |
Goble, C. (2014). Better software, better research. IEEE Internet Computing, 18(5), 4-8. http://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2014.88
DOI
|
38 |
Henry, E. & Faller, B. (1995). Large-scale industrial reuse to reduce cost and cycle time. IEEE Software, 12(5), 47-53. http://doi.org/10.1109/52.406756
DOI
|
39 |
Howison, J. & Bullard, J. (2016). Software in the scientific literature: problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2137-2155. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23538
DOI
|
40 |
Li, K., Lin, X., & Greenberg, J. (2016). Software citation, reuse and metadata considerations: an exploratory study examining LAMMPS. Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1-10. http://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301072
DOI
|
41 |
Malone, J., Brown, A., Lister, A. L., Ison, J. Hull, D., Parkinson, H., & Stevens, R. (2014). The software ontology (SWO): a resource for reproducibility in biomedical data analysis, curation and digital preservation. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5(25). http://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-25
DOI
|
42 |
Pan, X., Yan, E., & Hua, W. (2016). Disciplinary differences of software use and impact in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 109, 1593-1610. http://doi.org/s11192-016-2138-4
DOI
|
43 |
Hong, N. C. (2014). Minimal information for reusable scientific software. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Working towards Sustainable Scientific Software. Available: http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/16773670/MinimalInfoScientificSoftware.pdf
|