Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.2.201

A Study on Functional Requirements for the Establishment of Evidence Values of Electronic Records Focused on eDiscovery  

Choi, Kippeum (전북대학교 일반대학원 기록관리학과)
Lee, Gemma (국가기록원, 숙명여자대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과)
Oh, Hyo-Jung (전북대학교 문헌정보학과, 문화융복합아카아빙연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.38, no.2, 2021 , pp. 201-226 More about this Journal
Abstract
Discovery's collection was originally paper documents, but with the advent of the digital age, its collection expanded. Resolving the issue of ESI has now become important in litigation. Therefore, this study analyzes the requirements of each domain for electronic records to be recognized as evidence. It also explained the factors that should be considered in record management. In addition, eDiscovery in the United States was selected as an advanced case to utilize records as evidence. This study investigated the Commentary on Legal Holdings: The Trigger & The Process and analyzed which functions must be considered in order for electronic records to be preserved as evidence. To this end, we analyze the functional requirements of the eDiscovery solution. Through this, necessary functional requirements are derived to help implement the system in preparation for eDiscovery.
Keywords
electronic records; eDiscovery; EDRM; evidence values;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Isaza, J. (2007). E-discovery compels: A seat for RIM at the counsel table. Information Management Journal, 41(1), 46-49.
2 Lee, Gemma (2021b). An analysis on the revision process and main contents of the international standard ISO 16175 sets. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 67, 5-55. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2021.67.005   DOI
3 Lee, Kwanhee & Kim, GI Bum (2018). Second thoughts on conditions for digital evidence admissibility, Journal of Digital Forensics, 12(1), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.22798/kdfs.2018.12.1.93   DOI
4 Youn, Eunha (2019). A study on the concepts of record from a legal perspective. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 6, 89-121. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.089   DOI
5 Friedenthal, J., Kane, M. K., & Miller, A. R. (2005). Civil Procedure(Hornbooks). Minnesota: West Academic Publishing.
6 Jon, H. (2020. Aug 17). Sweden's Covid-19 strategist under fire over herd immunity emails. The Guardian. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/17/swedens-covid-19-strategist-under-fire-over-herd-immunity-emails
7 Millican, B. (2013). Building a successful E-discovery strategy. Information Management, 47(6), 32-34,36,47.
8 Schuler, K., Peterson, C. P., & Vincze, E. (2008). E-discovery: Creating and Managing an Enterprise Wide Progra. Massachusetts: Syngress.
9 Park, Ji Won (2008). Historical analysis on the common-law discovery in the United States and England. Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 113-133.
10 Korean Institute of Criminology (2011). A Study on the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information(E-Discovery). Seoul: Korean Institute of Criminology.
11 Ministry of Justice. Practice Direction 31A - Disclosure And Inspection. 출처: https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31/pd_part31a#2A.1
12 Kim, Do Hoon (2015). A study on the proportionality in electronic discovery in the U.S.A.. Hannam Journal of Law&Technology, 21(3), 3-44. https://doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2015.21.3.3   DOI
13 Kim, Il-a (2016). The Trends Analysis on the American Business Records Management Responding to E-Discovery. Master's thesis, Myongji University, Republic of Korea.
14 Judicial Policy Research Institute (2017). Basic rearch on the status and improvement plans for examining evidence of electronically stored information. Goyang: Judicial Policy Research Institute.
15 Cook, T. (2001). Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science, 1, 3-24.   DOI
16 The Sedona Conference (2018). The Sedona Principles: Best Practices, Recommendations & Principles for Addressing Electronic Document Production, The Sedona Conference Journal, 19(1), 1-214.
17 The Sedona Conference (2019). The Sedona Conference Commentary on Legal Holds: The Trigger & The Process. The Sedona Conference Journal, 20, 342-414.
18 EDRM. EDRM Model. 출처: https://edrm.net/
19 Legal Information Institute. Federal Rules of Evidence. 출처: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre
20 Legal Information Institute. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 출처: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp
21 Cohen, A. I. & Kalbaugh, G. E. (2010). ESI Handbook: Sources, Technology and Process. New York: Aspen Publishers.
22 Kim, Do Hoon (2020). A study on the sedona conference's commentary on legal holds. IT&LAW REVIEW, 0(20), 165-204. https://doi.org/10.37877/itnlaw.2020.02.20.5   DOI
23 Kwon, Yangsub (2016). A study on the admissibility of digital evidence. Legal Theory & Practice Review, 4(1), 149-168.
24 Lee, Gemma & Oh, Kyung-Mook (2020). A study on the judgment of authoritative records by applying the concept of authenticity and reliability. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(3), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.3.077   DOI
25 Kim, Senbom (2015). An Analysis on E-Discovery System as Opportunities and Threats for Record Management. Master's thesis, Myongji University, Republic of Korea.
26 Lee, Gemma (2021a). Measures to improve requirements for securing the quality of reliable electronic records. Presentations at the Korea Society of Archival Studies, 59-75.
27 Lee, Myoung Min (2019). Die forschung uber das selbstandige beweisverfahren in deutschland. Dong-A Law Review, 0(83), 243-268. https://doi.org/10.31839/DALR.2019.05.83.243   DOI
28 National Archives of Korea (2011). Records and Archival Studies. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea.
29 Park, Seoin & Kim, Jihyun (2020). A study on the analysis and improvement of public enterprises' record management for the utilization of record as legal evidence. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(2), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.2.041   DOI
30 Seol, Moon-won & Lee, Haein (2016). Business records and information management as preparation for e-discovery risks. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(4), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.4.007 The Criminal Procedure.   DOI
31 ISO 16175-1: 2020. Information and documentation - Processes and functional requirements for software for managing records - Part 1: Functional requirements and associated guidance for any applications that manage digital records.