Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.3.221

The Learning Behavior of K-MOOC Learners and K-MOOC Service Recommendations  

Ahn, Jun Hoo (연세대학교 문헌정보학과 대학원)
Lee, Jee Yeon (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.37, no.3, 2020 , pp. 221-252 More about this Journal
Abstract
According to the participants, the current K-MOOC (Korean Massive Open Online Course) has a few problems, such as too few courses, low content quality, and useless learner management system compared to MOOCs abroad. These problems caused diminished learner motivation. Consequently, the K-MOOC service has recorded a low course completion rate despite high expenses spent to develop the contents and thus requires remedies to fix the issues. This study drew research subjects from a pool of college and graduate students representing the primary users of the K-MOOC. This study limited the research scope to the four categories: motivation, learning experience, recognition, and performance of the Biggs' 3P Learning System Model. Based on the literature review, ten variables were selected and explored how the subjects perceived four categories using the survey questionnaire. This study also examined the relationship between ten variables and generated suggestions for the instructors, course managers, and platform developers to make the K-MOOC better.
Keywords
K-MOOC; learning completion rateformation resource system; knowledge and Information resource; usability evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, Hun Byoung (2019). Analysis of university students' perceptions about the possibility of utilizing K-MOOC as regular credit courses. CNU Journal of Educational Studies, 40(3), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2019.40.3.41   DOI
2 Lim, Sung Tae (2019). A development of clustering model of self-directed learning capabilities latent factors based on unsupervised machine learning. Master's thesis, The Graduate School of Chungbuk National University, Republic of Korea.
3 Lim, I-Rang (2019). An exploratory study on the risk factors and protection factors of K-MOOC Students' learning interruption. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 29(2), 147-171. https://doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.29.2.201906.147   DOI
4 Jung, Hyojung, Shin, Yoonhee, Kang, Youngmin, & Lee, Eunju (2019). Development of quality certification standards for MOOC. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(4), 739-748. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.4.739   DOI
5 Cho, Moon-Heum, & Byun, Moon-Kyoung (2015). College students' motivation and learning patterns in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Korean Journal of Educational Research, 53(4), 193-223.
6 Joo, Young Ju, & Kim, Dongsim (2017a). A study of satisfaction and intention to use MOOC based on UTAUT2 in Korea. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 13(1), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.26857/jlls.2017.02.13.1.185   DOI
7 Joo, Young Ju, & Kim, Dongsim (2017b). A study of outcomes utilizing K-MOOC credit based on the information system success model. The Journal of Educational Studies, 48(2), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.15854/jes.2017.06.48.2.95   DOI
8 Cha, Seung-Bong, & Park, Sung-Youl (2017). An analysis of structural relationships among university students' behavioral intention to use MOOC, major relevance, perceived usefulness, and acceptance attitude in agricultural science fields. Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, 49(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.23840/agehrd.2017.49.3.1
9 Han, Ga Hyung (2020). The relationship between need for cognition, self-regulation learning strategies, media multitasking, and perceived learning in massive online open course. Master's thesis, The Graduate School of Ewha womans University, Republic of Korea.
10 Ha, Byung-hwan, Cho, Hyen-suk, & Kim, Young-moon (2009). A study on the determinants of e-learning on learning motivations and scholastic achievements. The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Resarch, 9(3), 69-92.
11 Chou, S. W., & Liu, C. H. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based virtual learning environment: A learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00114.x   DOI
12 Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008   DOI
13 Han, Jae Hoon, Kwon, Suk Jin, & Park, Jong Sun (2015). (Re) binding the factors affecting student learning outcomes in a cyber university using the 3p model: Learning analytics approaches. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(2), 309-332. https://doi.org/10.15833/kafeiam.21.2.309
14 Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x   DOI
15 Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
16 Biggs, J. B., & Moore, P. (1993). The process of learning (3rd ed.). Sydney, AU: Prentice Hall.
17 Choi, Kyoung Ae (2016). Tasks for effective use of K-MOOC as a higher continuing education. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 12(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.26857/jlls.2016.05.12.2.1   DOI
18 Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Felice, M. D., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computer&Education, 122, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001   DOI
19 DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748   DOI
20 DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60   DOI
21 Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.920752   DOI
22 Haverila, M. J. (2012). The biggs and moore model in e-learning: The role of motivation and collaboration as moderators. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 169-179.
23 Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students' self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers&Education, 122, 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003   DOI
24 Jung, E., Kim, D., Yoon, M, Park, S., & Oakley, B. (2019). The influence of instructional design on learner control, sense of achievement, and perceived effectiveness in a supersize MOOC course. Computers&Education, 128, 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.001   DOI
25 Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213. https://doi.org/10.2307/249751   DOI
26 Machado-Da-Silva, F. N., Meirelles, F. D. S., Filenga, D., & Filho, M. B. (2014). Student satisfaction process in virtual learning system: Considerations based in information and service quality from brazil's experience. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.52605
27 Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001   DOI
28 King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003   DOI
29 Lan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(7), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5   DOI
30 Lang, A., & Chrzan, J. (2015). Media Multitasking: Good, bad, or ugly?. Communication Yearbook, 39(1), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11679173
31 Peltier, J. W., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2003). Virtual communities and the assessment of online marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 260-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475303257762   DOI
32 Pitt, L., Watson, R., & Kavan, C. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MISQuarterly, 19(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/249687
33 Powell, S., & Yuan, L. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Bolton, UK: CETIS.
34 Price, L. (2011). Modelling factors for predicting student learning outcomes in higher education. Antwerp, BE: University of Antwerp.
35 Ministry of Education (2020). 2020 basic plan for Korean-massive open online course (K-MOOC). Sejong: MOE.
36 Kee, Youngwha (2017). A study on the improvement of utilization of K-MOOC. Seoul: NILE.
37 Kee, Youngwha (2018). Global MOOC's learning and analysis of K-MOOC learning experience. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(3), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.3.65https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.3.65   DOI
38 Kim, So Jung (2012). A study on factors influencing OCW use intentions among Korean university students. Master's thesis, The Graduate School of Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea.
39 Kim, Eun Kyung (2007). Effects of feedback types in on-line performance assessment system on students' academic achievement and learning satisfaction. Master's thesis, The Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, Republic of Korea.
40 Kim, Ju Kyoung (2018). An analysis of K-MOOC structural relationship among characteristics and educational effectiveness. Docter's thesis, The Graduate School of Korea University, Republic of Korea.
41 Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self- determination perspective. Computers&Education, 92; 93, 194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012
42 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68   DOI
43 Kim, Chul Min (2018). Analysis of interaction factors impacting educational effects on K-MOOC. Master's thesis, The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Republic of Korea.
44 Jin, Qiuxiang, Chi, Yong Duk, & Gim, Gwangyong (2018). A study on the intention of continuous use of MOOC applying self-determination theory and learning flow theory: focused on differences between Korean and chinese culture. Journal of Information Technology Services, 17(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2018.17.1.121   DOI
45 Rha, Ilju (2015). Understanding MOOCs in a global learning age. Seoul: Hakjisa.
46 Seddon, P. B. (1997). A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information systems research, 8(3), 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240   DOI
47 Shrader, S., Wu, M., Owens-Nicholson, D., & Santa Ana, K. (2016). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Participant activity, demographics, and satisfaction. Online Learning, 20(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.596
48 Wang, Y. S., Wang, H. Y., & Shee, D. Y. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human behavior, 23(4), 1792-1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.006   DOI
49 Moon, Bang Hee (2018). A study on the effects of the roles and services of library on students' use intention in MOOC environment. Korean Library And Information Science Society, 49(1), 193-214. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.1.201803.193   DOI
50 Moon, Jin Hee, Eoteugeonghu, Zolzaya, & Yun, Hyeong Wan (2018). A case study experience of college students who completed K-MOOC course. The Journal of Education Assignment Institute, 24(2), 67-86.
51 Park, Tae-Jung, & Rha, Ilju (2016). A content analysis on learning experience of K-MOOC (Korea-Massive Open Online Course): Focused on Korean University Students. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(12), 446-457. https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2016.16.12.446   DOI
52 Bae, Ye-Sun, & Jun, Woo-Chun (2014). A study on analysis of current status and improvement suggestions for massive open online courses. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 18(12), 3005-3012. https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2014.18.12.3005   DOI
53 Lee, Jeongmin, & Jeon, Jeonga (2019). An analysis on perception of Korean university students learners on MOOCs. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.3.001   DOI
54 Byun, Moon Kyoung, & Cho, Moon-Heum (2017). K-MOOC (Korea Massive Open Online Course) learner motivation: Initial motivation for enrollment and continuing motivation for completion. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(3), 125-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.3.125   DOI
55 Lee, Jeong Ki, Kim, Hyo Eun, & Joo, Ji Hyuk (2017). A study on decision-making factors of university students to intention to accept massive open online course (MOOC). The Journal of Image and Cultural Contents, 13, 7-31. https://doi.org/10.24174/jicc.2017.12.13.7   DOI
56 Lee, Jeong Ki, & Huang, Yu-Tien (2017). A study on the determinants of college students intention to take K-MOOC. Social Science Research Review, 33(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.18859/ssrr.2017.05.33.2.161   DOI