Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.225

Developing Facets for Fiction Retrieval Based on User-generated Book Tags  

Shim, Jiyoung
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.37, no.2, 2020 , pp. 225-249 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to identify and systematize various facet elements required by users in fiction search situations from book tags to improve the fiction search environment. Based on the Ranganathan's PMEST formula, the basic facet system of the fiction was defined as 1) the personality that forms the fiction material, 2) the content and external characteristics that compose the fiction, 3) the reader interaction with books, 4) spatial information related to fiction and reading activities, and 5) time information related to fiction and reading activities. Out of approximately 310,000 tags assigned to 7,174 fiction, 3,730 core tags were selected and content-analyzed. As a result, various attributes were systematized around the top 25 categories of the fiction facets. The results of this study can be applied to facet navigation of OPAC and fiction DB in the future.
Keywords
social tagging; fiction retrieval; LibraryThing; content analysis; facet;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yu, L., & O'Brien, A. (1997). Constructing references from the book to the reader in fiction searching, an experiment on the construction of information cues from the reading context approach. Information Services & Use, 17(2-3), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-1997-172-315   DOI
2 Bartley, P. (2009). Book tagging on LibraryThing: How, why, and what are in the tags? Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1-22. https://doi:10.1002/meet.2009.1450460228   DOI
3 Broughton, V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1-2), 49-72. https://doi:10.1108/00012530610648671   DOI
4 Chung, Y. K. (2014). A study on varieties of subject access and usabilities of the national library of Korea subject headings. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(4), 171-185. https://doi:10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.171   DOI
5 Desrochers, N., Laplante, A., Martin, K., Quan-Haase, A., & Spiteri, L. (2016). Illusions of a "Bond": Tagging cultural products across online platforms. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), 1027-1051. https://doi:10.1108/jd-09-2015-0110   DOI
6 Elson, D. K., & McKeown, K. R. (2010). Automatic attribution of quoted speech in literary narrative. Paper presented at the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
7 Flick, U. (2019). An introduction to qualitative research (18th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
8 Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198-208. https://doi:10.1177/0165551506062337   DOI
9 Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
10 Iosif, E., & Mishra, T. (2014). From speaker identification to affective analysis: A multi-step system for analyzing children's stories. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature, Gothenburg, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-0906
11 Pejtersen, A. M. (1980). Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarian's search strategies. In O. Harboe & L. Kajberg (Eds.), Theory and Application of Information Research (pp. 146-159). London: Mansell.
12 Lawson, K. G. (2009). Mining social tagging data for enhanced subject access for readers and researchers. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(6), 574-582. https://doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.020   DOI
13 Lu, C. M., Park, J. R., & Hu, X. H. (2010). User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal of Information Science, 36(6), 763-779. https://doi:10.1177/0165551510386173   DOI
14 Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J. R., Bethard, S., & McClosky, D. (2014, June). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. Paper presented at the 52nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, System Demonstrations, Stroudsburg, PA. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p14-5010
15 Morbhead, D. R., Pejtersen, A. M., & Rouse, W. B. (1984). The value of information and computer-aided information seeking: Problem formulation and application to fiction retrieval. Information processing & management, 20(5-6), 583-601. https://doi:10.1016/0306-4573(84)90075-X   DOI
16 Nadeau, D., & Sekine, S. (2007). A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30(1), 3-26. https://doi:10.1075/li.30.1.03nad   DOI
17 Pejtersen, A. M. (1997). Subject access to Scandinavian fiction literature: Index methods and OPAC development. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
18 Pejtersen, A. M., & Austin, J. (1983). Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on users’ value criteria (part 1). Journal of Documentation, 39(4), 230-246. https://doi:10.1108/eb026750   DOI
19 Lee, Seungmin (2011). Construction of folksonomy tag framework using bibliographic record. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(2), 185-207. https://doi:10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.185   DOI
20 Kim, Dong-Suk, & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2010). A study on the application of librarything folksonomy tags through the analysis of elements related with work. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 41-60. https://doi:10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.041   DOI
21 Adkins, D., & Bossaller, J. E. (2007). Fiction access points across computer-mediated book information sources: A comparison of online bookstores, reader advisory databases, and public library catalogs. Library & Information Science Research, 29(3), 354-368. https://doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2007.03.004   DOI
22 Atdag, S., & Labatut, V. (2013). A comparison of named entity recognition tools applied to biographical texts. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Systems and Computer Science, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France. https://doi.org/10.1109/icconscs.2013.6632052
23 Saarti, J. (2019). Fictional literature, classification and indexing. Knowledge Organization, 46(4), 320-332. https://doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2019-4-320   DOI
24 Pejtersen, A. M., & Austin, J. (1984). Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on users’ value criteria (part 2). Journal of Documentation, 40(1), 25-35. https://doi:10.1108/eb026755   DOI
25 Ranganathan, S. R. (1967). Prolegomena to library classification (3rd ed.). Bombay; New York: Asia Publishing House.
26 Saarti, J. (1999). Fiction indexing and the development of fiction thesauri. Journal of librarianship and information science, 31(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/096100069903100203   DOI
27 Satija, M. (2017). Reviews of Concepts in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, 44(4), 291-307. https://doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2017-4-291   DOI
28 Smith, T. (2007). Cataloging and you: Measuring the efficacy of a folksonomy for subject analysis. Paper presented at the 18th workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research, Milwaukee, WI.
29 Solomon, P. (1997). Access to fiction for children: A user-based assessment of options and opportunities. Information Services & Use, 17(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-1997-172-308   DOI
30 Wilson, H. W. (2016). Fiction Core Collection (18th ed.). Ipswich, Massachusetts: Grey House Publishing, Inc.
31 Wu, D., He, D. Q., Qiu, J., Lin, R. N., & Liu, Y. (2013). Comparing social tags with subject headings on annotating books: A study comparing the information science domain in English and Chinese. Journal of Information Science, 39(2), 169-187. https://doi:10.1177/0165551512451808   DOI