Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.1.127

A Study on Legal Commentary Information Services Based on the Usage Patterns of Legal Information Sources  

Won, Jong Sam (대법원 법원도서관)
Lee, Jee Yeon (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.37, no.1, 2020 , pp. 127-151 More about this Journal
Abstract
The court has the responsibility to determine the final interpretation of the law. The court hands down final decisions on personal disputes and conflicts between individuals and the state. Legal commentaries will stay true to their intention of providing diverse legal theories and enabling a unified legal interpretation only when law practitioners are allowed to discuss in depth laws, cases, and legal theories within the boundaries set by commentary authors. If law practitioners include the latest laws, cases, and legal theories as well as their opinions to existing commentaries in their judicial roles and legal studies, they will be able to obtain a unified legal interpretation without referring to other legal literature.
Keywords
commentary; annotation; legal commentary; law practitioner; information seeking behavior; information needs; collective intelligence; legal information sources; legal information service; legal interpretation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim, Hwang-Woo (2012). A study of the information seeking behaviors of law school students. The Graduate School, Chonbuk National University, Department of Library and Information Science.
2 Moon, Yong-Ho (1998). Informatization and its impact on Judicial Practice (The present status and the future views about search for legal informations). Judicial Materials, 79, 303-304.
3 Lee, Jee-Yeon (2006). An overview of developing & applying information use behavior models. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 5-10.
4 Jun, Gyung-Gun (2004). Lectures on the law information. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
5 Jong, Sang-Jo (2007). Copyright law commentary. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
6 Jong, Sang-Jo, & Park Seong Soo (2010). Patent law commentary. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
7 Ju, Min-Ji (2013). Information needs and information-seeking behaviors of law school students. The Graduate School Yonsei University, Department of Library and Information Science.
8 Choi, Mi-soon (2007). A review of the research trends on the information seeking behavior of legal professionals. DOSEOGWAN, 62(2), 25-30.
9 Han, Seung-Hee, & Lee Jee Yeon (2006). Searching behavior of scientists and technologists based on their information needs. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 17-22.
10 Chancellor, R. (2010). Legal information seeking in a time-constrained environment: A conceptual model for lawyers. International Journal of Legal Information, 38(3), 282-294. https//doi:10.1017/S0731126500005886   DOI
11 Chancellor, R. (2015). Getting it from the source: What librarians think about lawyer search behavior. Law Library Journal, 107(2), 287-295.
12 Kadli, Jayadev H; Hanchinal, Veeresh B. (2015). Information seeking behaviour of law students in the changing digital environment. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.35.1.8099   DOI
13 Choo. (1998). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
14 Cole, C., Carol C. Kuhlthau. (2000). Information and information seeking of novice versus expert lawyers: How experts and value. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 103-116.
15 Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioral model for information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science, 15(4-5), 237-247.   DOI
16 Hainsworth, Melody May (1992). Information-seeking behavior of judge of the florida district courts of appeal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Florida State University, USA.
17 Hong, M. J. (1997). Information needs and research behavior of legal professionals in Korea. Annual Review of Library and Information Science, 26, 291-331.
18 Leckie, Gloria J., Pettigrew, Karen E., & Sylvain, Christian (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 66(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.1086/602864
19 Makri, S. (2008). A study of lawyers' information behaviour leading to the development of two methods for evaluating electronic resources. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University College London. Retrieved from https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/2337/1/MakriPhD.pdf
20 Makri, S., Blandford, A., & Cox, A. L. (2008). Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From ellis’s model to design. Information Processing & Management, 44(2), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.001   DOI
21 Vale, M. E. (1988). Information structure and the information seeking behavior of lawyers. Unpublished Doctoral disseration, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
22 Otike, Japhet (1999). The information needs and seeking habits of lawyers in england: A pilot study. The International Information & Library Review, 31(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.1999.10762486   DOI
23 Rai, P. (2013). Information seeking behavior of legal researcher towards use of electronic legal resource: a study. Proceedings of the 9th International CALIBER, INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar, March 21-23, 62-73.
24 Solomon, Y., Bronstein, J. (2016). Serendipity in legal information seeking behavior, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-04-2015-0056   DOI
25 Sutton, S. (1994). The role of attorney mental models of law in case relevance determinations: an exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 186-200.   DOI
26 Thanuskodi, S. (2009). Information-seeking behaviour of law faculty at central law college, salem. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/282
27 Wilkinson, M. A. (2001). Information sources used by lawyers in problem-solving: An empirical exploration. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0740-8188(01)00082-2   DOI
28 Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Information Science, 3(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.28945/576
29 Winter, S. (2008). Law firm libraries in the 21st century. Legal Information Management, 8(1), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669608000066   DOI
30 Kang, Min-Koo (2003). Unified Court - The 21st century open trial court with judicial information. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
31 Kwak, Yoon-Jik (1992). Civil law commentary(1). Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
32 Kim, Kwang-Jin (1996). A study on the user behavior of legal information by legal practitioners. Graduate School of Sung Kyun Kwan University, Department of Library & Information Science.
33 Kim, Na-Won, & Park, Ji-Hong (2009). Exploring medical doctors' medical information seeking behaviors. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3), 435-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.435
34 Kim, Nam-Hee (2009). A study on service model of law library based on library 2.0. Graduate School of Information Science Soongsil University, Department of Knowledge Management.
35 Kim, Ji-Hyun (2015). A study on the lawyer's legal information seeking behaviors for the law practice. The Graduate School Hansung University, Major in Library and Information Science, Deparment of Library and Information Science.
36 Kim, Min-Gyu (2013). A study on information use attitudes of legal information service users. Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Department of Library and Information Science.
37 Kim, Jung-Suk (2010). Studying law school students' information search process related to schoolwork. Sung kyun kwan University, Library and Information Science.
38 Kim, Zeung-Han (1973). (Theory․Case) Civil law commentary(1). Seoul: Korea Institute Judicial Administrative.