Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.141

Key Factors in the Implementation of Research Data Management Services  

Kim, Seonghun (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
Oh, Sam G. (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.35, no.2, 2018 , pp. 141-165 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine crucial factors of consideration in ensuring the successful implementation of research data management services. The study begins by extracting a range of service areas from their equivalent in existing research on data management services. It then collects relevant information via e-mail survey from eight individuals respectively overseeing research data management services at six university libraries and one institution located throughout the United States, Germany, and Australia. Having originated in overseas cases, the resulting factors of consideration were reviewed by domestic experts in research data management services. The finalized areas of research data management services consist of nine categories. The crucial factors of consideration in RDM services are connection between research services and research data management services; national/university-level/institutional agreements; metadata entry personnel and required elements; strategies for the provision of specialized staff; major service area selection through user demand analysis; effective linkage between research data and research results; and close cooperation with users and related organizations.
Keywords
research data; research data management(RDM); RDM services; RDM service considerations; RDM oversea cases;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kang, HeeJong (2012). Key resources in 21st century, policy tasks on use of national scientific data. STEPI Insight, (91), 1-26.
2 Kim, SunTae, Hahn, SunHwa, Lee, Taeyoung, & Kim, Yong (2010). A study on a model for using and preserving scientific data. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 21(4), 81-93.
3 Kim, EunJeong, & Nam, TaeWoo (2012). Factor analysis of effects on research data collection. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(2), 27-44. http://dx.doi.Org/10.3743/K08IM.2012.29.2.027   DOI
4 Kim, JiHyun (2014). A study on research data management services of research university libraries in the U.S. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 25(3), 165-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.165
5 Seoul National University (2010). Seoul National University Research Ethics Guidelines
6 Shim, WonSik (2015). Developing a roadmap for national research data management governance: based on the analysis of united kingdom's case. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 355-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.4.355   DOI
7 Shim, WonSik (2016). A case study of u.s. academic libraries' research data support services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 311-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.31   DOI
8 Lee, SangHwan, & Shim, WonSik (2009). Sharing and Utilizing for Scientific Data. KISTI Knowlege Report, 5.
9 Bouma, G. D., & Ling, R. (2004). The Research Process. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
10 Carlson, J. (2018, January 28). email interview with the author.
11 Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299-316.   DOI
12 Kozlowski, W. A. (2018, January 30). email interview with the author.
13 Hedstrom, M., & Jinfang, N. (2008). Incentives for data producers to create "archive/ready" data: Implications for archives and records management. In Proceedings from the Society of American Archivists Research Forum.
14 Helbig, K. (2018, February 12). email interview with the author.
15 Jones, S., Pryor, G., & Whyte, A. (2013). 'How to Develop Research Data Management Services-a guide for HEIs'. DCC How-to Guides. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides
16 Muilenburg, J. S. (2018, February 2). email interview with the author.
17 Perry, C. M. (2008). Archiving of publicly funded research data: A survey of Canadian researchers. Government Information Quarterly, 25(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.008   DOI
18 Simons, N., & Yu, F. (2018, February 3). email interview with the author.
19 Wolf, N., & Steeves, V. (2018, February 17). email interview with the author.