Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.155

A Study on Developing a Metadata Search System Based on the Text Structure of Korean Studies Research Articles  

Song, Min-Sun (성균관대학교 정보관리연구소)
Ko, Young Man (성균관대학교 문과대학 문헌정보학과)
Lee, Seung-Jun (성균관대학교 정보관리연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.33, no.3, 2016 , pp. 155-176 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to develope a scholarly metadata information system based on conceptual elements of text structure of Korean studies research articles and to identify the applicability of text structure based metadata as compared with the existing similar system. For the study, we constructed a database(Korean Studies Metadata Database, KMD) with text structure based on metadata of Korean Studies journal articles selected from the Korea Citation Index(KCI). Then we verified differences between KCI system and KMD system through search results using same keywords. As a result, KMD system shows the search results which meet the users' intention of searching more efficiently in comparison with the KCI system. In other words, even if keyword combinations and conditional expressions of searching execution are same, KMD system can directly present the content of research purposes, research data, and spatial-temporal contexts of research et cetera as search results through the search procedure.
Keywords
Korean studies; research articles; text structure; semantic structure; metadata search system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ono, K., Sumita, K., & Miike, S. (1994). Abstract generation based on rhetorical structure extraction. Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics, 1, 344-348.
2 Shotton, D. (2009). Cito, the citation typing ontology. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 1(Suppl 1), S6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s6   DOI
3 Sibun, P. (1993). Domain structure, rhetorical structure, and text structure. Proceedings of the Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations on the 31st ACL. Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, USA.
4 Superceanu R. (1998). The rhetoric of scientific articles: A genre study. Timisoara, Rumania: Orizonturi Universitare.
5 van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum.
6 Vater, H. (1994). Einfuhrung in die textlinguistik. Munchen: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
7 Weigand, E. (2009). Language as dialogue: From rules to principles of probability. (Ed. Feller, S.), Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
8 Werlich, E. (1976). A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.
9 박진용 (1997). 텍스트 의미 구조의 과정 중심 분석 방법 연구. 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 대학원, 국어교육학과 국어교육전공. (Park, Chin-Yong (1997). A study on the method of process-driven analysis in text structure. Master's Thesis, Graduate School of the Korea National University of Education, Department of Korean Language Education.)
10 고영만, 송인석 (2011). 연구 문헌의 지식구조를 반영하는 의미기반의 지식조직체계에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 145-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.1.145 (Ko, Young-Man, & Song, Inseok (2011). A study on the knowledge organizing system of research papers based on semantic relation of the knowledge structure. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1), 145-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2011.28.1.145)   DOI
11 송민선, 고영만 (2015). 한국학 연구 논문의 의미구조 기반 메타데이터 연구. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 46(3), 277-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.3.201509.277 (Song, Min-Sun, & Ko, Young Man (2015). A study on the metadata based on the semantic structure of the Korean studies research articles. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(3), 277-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.3.201509.277)   DOI
12 Bouayad-Agha, N., Power, R., & Scott, D. (2000). Can text structure be incompatible with rhetorical structure? Proceedings of the First International Conference on Natural Language Generation. 12-16 Jun 2000, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/1118253.1118280   DOI
13 유사라, 이혜원, 송인석 (2009). 연구자 중심 연구성과물 의미검색을 위한 인문사회 학술용어 온톨로지 적용 및 유지관리 체계 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(2), 277-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2009.43.2.277 (Yoo, Sa-Rah, Lee, Hye-Won, & Song, Inseok (2009). A study on the application and management framework of social science scholarly ontology for semantic information navigation. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(2), 277-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2009.43.2.277)   DOI
14 정여훈 (2013). 수사구조이론과 한국어 텍스트 분석의 실제. 언어사실과 관점, 32, 261-288. (Jeong, Yeo Hoon (2013). Rhetorical structure theory and the practice of Korean text analysis. Language Facts and Perspective, 32, 261-288.)
15 Beissel-Durrant, G. (2004). A typology of research methods within the social sciences. NCRM (National Centre for Research Methods) working paper, NCRM.
16 de Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Einfuhrung in die textlinguistik. Tubingen: Niemeyer.
17 Brewer, W. F. (1980). Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18 Brinker, K. (1985). Linguistische textanalyse. Berlin: Erich Schmitdt Verlag.
19 Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, S. E., & Dominique, J. (2000). Scholonto: Ontology-based digital library server for research document and discourse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 3, 237-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007990000034   DOI
20 Frederiksen, C. H. (1975). Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 7(3), 371-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90016-x   DOI
21 Halladay, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohension in English. London: Longman.
22 Harmsze, F. A. P. (2000). A modular structure for scientific articles in an electronic environment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, University of Amsterdam.
23 Heflin, J., Hendler, J., & Luke, S. (1998). Reading between the lines: Using SHOE to discover implicit knowledge from the web. AAAI-98 Workshop on AI and Information Integration (Vol. 297).
24 Kampa, S. R. (2002). Who are the expert? e-scholars in the semantic web. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Southampton.
25 Kando, N. (1997). Text-level structure of research papers: Implications for text-based information processing systems. Proceedings of the 19th Annual BCS-IRSG Colloquium on IR Research, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 68-81.
26 Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam; North-Holland Publishing Co.
27 Kando, N. (1999). Text structure analysis as a tool to make retrieved documents sable. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Information Retrieval with Asian Languages. 126-135.
28 Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29 Luke, S., Spector, L., & Rager, D. (1996). Ontology-based knowledge discovery on the worldwide web. Working Notes of the Workshop on Internet-Based Information Systems at the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI96), 96-102.