Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.063

Investigating Change of Users' Perception of Privacy Pre- and Post-Education on Library User Privacy  

Noh, Younghee (건국대학교 문헌정보학과)
Kim, Tae-Kyung (국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소)
Kim, Dong-Seok (마포구립서강도서관)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.32, no.1, 2015 , pp. 63-84 More about this Journal
Abstract
Library users must provide their personal information to libraries. This study surveyed these library users' perception of privacy and the effect of the education after providing library user privacy education. As a result, first, it was found that after education, users were more interested in their privacy, rated the problem of library user privacy as more severe, and rated library user data collection as more likely to be considered privacy invasion. Second, we investigated users' perception of how much user service records being collected in libraries violate users' privacy, which showed a great perception change in 25 questions after the education. Third, in the survey about library and librarians' efforts for protecting library user privacy, it was found that all 15 questions were rated as significantly more important after education. Fourth, library users have recognized that is necessary to process and handle the library record and are more sympathetic to the need for this procedure. Fifth, library users felt the possibility of a library record leak was a very serious threat.
Keywords
library user; privacy; personal information; user education; perception change;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강순희 (2003). 사서 및 정보서비스직의 윤리의식에 관한 연구. 시민과도서관, 4(4), 20-59. (Kang, Sun-Hui (2003). A study on ethic of librarians and information services job. Library with People, 4(4), 20-59.)
2 김혜선 (1994). 사서직 윤리에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. (Kim, Hye-Sun (1994). A study on ethics in librarianship. M. A. thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.)
3 노영희 (2012a). 도서관의 개인정보보호정책 개발 및 제안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(4), 207-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.207 (Noh, Younghee (2012a). A study on developing and proposing the library privacy policy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(4), 207-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.207)   DOI   ScienceOn
4 노영희 (2012b). 디지털도서관서비스기록과 이용자프라이버시에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(3), 187-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.187 (Noh, Younghee (2012b). A study of digital library service records and user privacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(3), 187-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.187)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 노영희 (2013). 도서관 이용자 프라이버시에 대한 사서인식 조사연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3), 73-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.073 (Noh, Younghee (2013). A study on librarians perception of library user privacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 73-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.073)   DOI
6 이미화 (2006). 프라이버시 및 도서관 기록에 대한 이용자 인식조사. 사대도협회지, 7, 225-240. (Lee, Mi-Hwa (2006). A study on user perceptions about privacy and library records. The Journal of the Korean Private University Library Association, 7, 225-240.)
7 임리사, 변나향, 최재필, 임승빈 (2010). 대학도서관 열람실 시각적 프라이버시와 좌석선호도의 관계 분석. 대한건축학회 논문집, 26(5), 139-147. (Lim, Lisa, Byun, Na-Hyang, Choi, Jae-Pil, & Im, Seung-Bin (2010). An analysis of the relationship between visual privacy and preference of seats of university library. The Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(5), 139-147.)
8 ALA (2002). Privacy: An interpretation of the library bill of rights. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=interpretations&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=132904
9 Blitz, M. J. (2006). Constitutional safeguards for silent experiments in living: Libraries, the right to read, and a first amendment theory for an unaccompanied right to receive information. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 74, 799.
10 Bowers, S. L. (2008). Self-service holds: A violation of library patron's privacy. Public Libraries, 47(4), 54-57.
11 Gardner, C. (2002). Fact or fiction : Privacy in american libraries. The 12th Conference on Computers Freedom & Privacy. Retrieved from http://www.cfp2002.org/proceedings/proceedings/gardner.pdf
12 Garoogian, R. (1991). Librarian/Patron confidentiality: An ethical challenge. Library Trends, 40(2), 216-233.
13 Johnston, S. D. (2000). Rethinking privacy in the public library. The International Information & Library Review, 32(3-4), 509-517.   DOI
14 Klinefelter, A. (2007). Privacy and library public services: Or, I know what you read last summer. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 26(1-2), 253-279.
15 Madison Public Library (2012). USA Patriot Act and Madison Public Library Records. Retrieved from http://www.madisonpubliclibrary.org/policies/usa-patriot-act-and-madison-public-library-records
16 Pariser, E. (2011). 10 Ways to pop your filter bubble. Retrieved from http://www.thefilterbubble.com/10-things-you-can-do
17 Pariser, E. (2011). Beware online filter bubbles. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles.html
18 Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet Is hiding from you. New York: The Penguin Press.
19 Peralta, E. (2012). Google admits it did not delete data taken from Wifi devices. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/07/27/157494565/google-admits-it-did-notdelete-data-taken-from-wi-fi-devices
20 Shils, E. (1966). Privacy: Its constitution and vicissitudes. Law and Contemporary Problems, 31(2), 281-306.   DOI
21 Sturges, P., Eric, D., James, D., Ursula, I., Ursula, I., Charles, O., & Rachel, H. (2003). User privacy in the digital library environment: An investigation of policies and preparedness. Library Management, 24(1-2), 44-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Shuler, J. (2004). Privacy and academic libraries: Widening the frame of discussion. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(2), 157-159.   DOI