1 |
Dominguez, S., & Hollstein, B. (2014). Mixed methods social networks research: Design and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
2 |
Frenken, K., Holzl, W., & Vor, F. (2005). The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988-2002). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1), 9-30.
DOI
|
3 |
Guns, R., Liu, Y. X., & Mahbuba, D. (2011). Q-measures and betweenness centrality in a collaboration network: A case study of the field of informetrics. Scientometrics, 87(1), 133-147.
DOI
|
4 |
Hara, N. (2007). Information technology support for communities of practice: How public defenders learn about winning and losing in court. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 76-87.
DOI
|
5 |
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.-L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., & Liu, Z. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 189-202.
DOI
|
7 |
Hunter, L., & Leahey, E. (2008). Collaborative research in sociology: Trends and contributing factors. The American Sociologist, 39(4), 290-306.
DOI
|
8 |
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Kling, R., Rosenbaum, H., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Understanding and communicating social informatics: A framework for studying and teaching the human context of information and communication technologies. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
|
10 |
Kretschmer, H. (1994). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30(1), 363-369.
DOI
|
11 |
Kretschmer, H., & Kretschmer, T. (2007). A new centrality measure for social network analysis applicable to bibliometric and webometric data. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 1(1), 1-7.
|
12 |
Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2013). Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980-2010. Scientometrics, 97(3), 491-517.
DOI
|
13 |
Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships?. Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15.
DOI
|
14 |
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
DOI
|
15 |
Leydesdorff, L., & Persson, O. (2010). Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1622-1634.
|
16 |
Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15-36.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Maglaughlin, K. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2005). Factors that impact interdisciplinary natural science research collaboration in academia. 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 499-508. Jul, Stockholm.
|
18 |
McKelvey, M., Alm, H., & Riccaboni, M. (2003). Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology - Pharmaceutical sector?. Research Policy, 32(3), 483-501.
DOI
|
19 |
Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.
DOI
|
20 |
Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Meyerson, E. M. (1994). Human capital, social capital and compensation: The relative contribution of social contacts to managers. Acta Sociologica, 37(4), 383-399.
DOI
|
22 |
Newman, M. E. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404-409.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Newman, M. E. (2003). Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E,. 67(2), 026126.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Newman, M. E. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5200-5205.
|
25 |
Newman, M. E. (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27(1), 39-54.
DOI
|
26 |
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Persson, O. (2008). Bibexcel: A toolbox for bibliometricians (Vol. 4). version 2008-08.
|
28 |
Persson, O., & Beckmann, M. (1995). Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties. Scientometrics, 33(3), 351-366.
DOI
|
29 |
Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84(2), 365-371.
DOI
|
30 |
Sheu, C., Yen, H. R., & Chae, B. (2006). Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration: Evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 24-49.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of management, 20(2), 503-530.
|
32 |
Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R. P., Hall, K. L., & Taylor, B. K. (2008). The ecology of team science: Understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S96-S115.
DOI
|
33 |
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 12-28.
|
34 |
van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463-472.
DOI
|
35 |
Vinkler, P. (2010). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
|
36 |
Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
37 |
Wulf, W. A. (1993). The collaboratory opportunity. Science, 261(13), 854-855.
DOI
|
38 |
김용학, 윤정로, 조혜선, 김영진 (2007). 과학기술 공동연구의 연결망 구조: 좁은 세상과 위치 효과. 한국사회학, 41(4), 68-103.(Kim, Yong Hak, Yoon, Jung Ro, Cho, Hyesun, & Kim, Yung Jin (2007). Structure of collaboration network among Korean scientiest: 'Small World' and position effect. Korean Journal of Sociology, 41(4), 68-103.)
|
39 |
박지연, 김정은, 민윤경 (2010). 기관단위 연구성과 평가방법에 관한 연구: h-지수 및 변형지수를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 249-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.249(Park, Ji Yeon, Kim, Jung Eun, & Min, Yoon Kyung (2010). A study on the evaluation methods of research institution: Based on the h-index and its variants. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 27(1), 249-267.)
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
40 |
박치성 (2012). 행정학 학문공동체의 공동연구 네트워크 구조에 관한 연구: 1998-2009년간 24개 행정학 학술지의 논문공저자 네트워크의 분석을 중심으로. 한국사회와 행정연구, 22(4), 129-153.(Park, Chi Sung (2012). A study on the network structure of the public administration academic community using the coauthor network from 1998 to 2009. Korean Society and Public Administration, 22(4), 129-153.)
|
41 |
손동원 (2003). 사회 네트워크 분석. 서울: 경문각.(Son, Dong Won (2003). Social network analysis. Seoul: Kyungmungak.)
|
42 |
안순일 (2009). 협동연구의 영향요인에 대한 실증적 연구. 대한경영학회지, 22(1), 291-327.(An, Soon Il (2009). An empirical study on the factors affecting the cooperative R&D project between academia and industry. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 22(1), 291-327.)
|
43 |
이재윤 (2006). 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 333-355.(Lee, Jae Yun (2006). A study on the network generation methods for examining the intellectual structure of knowledge domain. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2), 333-355.)
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
이재윤, 최상희 (2013). Collaboration networks and document networks in informetrics research from 2001 to 2011. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 179-191.(Lee, Jae Yun, & Choi, Sang Hee (2013). Collaboration networks and document networks in Informetrics research from 2001 to 2011. Journal of Korean Society for Information Management. 30(1), 179-191.) http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.179
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
45 |
Abbasi, A., & Altmann. J. (2011). On the correlation between research performance and social network analysis measures applied to research collaboration networks. 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-44), 1-10.
|
46 |
Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
47 |
Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286 (5439), 509-512.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
48 |
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52.
DOI
|
49 |
Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek-program for large network analysis. Connections, 21(2), 47-57.
|
50 |
Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65-84.
DOI
|
51 |
Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226-2239.
DOI
|
52 |
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis.
|
53 |
Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
54 |
Bukova, H. (2010). Studying research collaboration: A literature review. Sprouts Working Papers on Information Systems, 10, Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-3
|
55 |
Creswell, J. W. (2006). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2ndEd.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
|
56 |
Diesing, P. (1991). How social science works. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg.
|