Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.077

A Study on the Comparison of Applying RDA in US Academic Libraries  

Lee, Mihwa (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.31, no.1, 2014 , pp. 77-97 More about this Journal
Abstract
It is necessary to find the practical considerations for applying RDA in building up the bibliographic records by importing RDA records from LC or OCLC in Korea. Especially, it is not easy to apply RDA appropriately because there are many alternatives and options in RDA. Therefore, this study is to grasp the way for applying RDA in building up the bibliographic records by reviewing LC RDA guidelines and analyzing RDA cataloging policies of libraries such as University of Chicago, North Carolina State University, and Standford University. As a result, these libraries have catalogued according to LC RDA guidelines and each library has its own guidelines, i.e., in statement of responsibilities, to transcribe all but exceptionally allow to transcribe only first, in publication statement, to use 264 field or 260 field, and in resource types, to transcribe all types of content, media and carrier or to transcribe 33X with GMD. Therefore followings would be considered for RDA application. First, some variations could be allowed for special situations of libraries in applying RDA and LC RDA guidelines. Second, the hybrid records that describe the core element of RDA to non-RDA records would be written in processing AACR2 to RDA. Third;the display of 33X field would be designed for expressing the resource types.
Keywords
RDA; cataloging rules; hybrid record; LC RDA Core Elements;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 North Carolina State University (2013c, April 8). Policy on RDA monographic cataloging. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Policy+on+RDA+Monographic+Cataloging
2 OCLC (2013, January 2). OCLC RDA policy statement. Retrieved from http://oclc.org/rda/new-policy.en.html
3 Stanford University (2011, December). Standford - RDA post-test: Stanford vs. LC decisions. Retrieved from https://lib.stanford.edu/metadata-department/stanford-rda-post-test-stanford-vs-lc-decisions-upd-22011
4 U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee (2011). Report and recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf
5 University of Chicago (2010a, June 14). Library timeline for RDA testing. Retrieved from http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/uofctimeline.pdf
6 University of Chicago (2010b, September 28). Policies & Decisions on Choices in RDA. Retrieved from http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/policiesandchoicesinrda.pdf
7 Library of Congress (2012, May 16). LC RDA core elements. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/core_elements.pdf
8 Davis, R. (2010, July 13). Changing AACR2 records to RDA records. Retrieved from http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/ChangingAACR2recordstoRDArecords.pdf
9 이미화 (2013). RDA의 해외도서관 적용 사례. 2013 디지털도서관 심포지엄 II: RDA 새로운 도전 그리고 과제 (pp. 9-44). 서울: 국립중앙도서관.(Lee, Mihwa (2013). Case study of RDA application. In 2013 Digital library symposium II: RDA, new challenge and problem (pp. 9-44). Seoul: The National Library of Korea.)
10 ALA (2010). RDA toolkit. IL: ALA.
11 Cronin, C. (2011). From testing to implementation: Managing full-scale RDA adoption at the University of Chicago. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49, 626-646.   DOI
12 Dyla, J. (2012, June 26). Report: RDA at Standford. Retrieved from http://lib.stanford.edu/metadata-department/metadata-developmet-unit/see-whats-new/rda-stanford_report26June2012
13 El-Sherbini, M. (2013). RDA: strategies for implementation. IL: ALA.
14 North Carolina State University (2010, September 23). Rule of 3. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Rule+of+3
15 North Carolina State University (2012, February 9). Relationship designators (Relator Terms). Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Relationship+Designators+%28Relator+Terms%29
16 North Carolina State University (2013a, April 12). 336-338 fields. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/336-338+fields
17 North Carolina State University (2013b, April 12). 264 field. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/264+Field