1 |
Bae, K.-J. (2010). The analysis of the differences of information needs and usages among academic users in the field of science and technology. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(2), 157-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.2.157
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Barret, A. (2005). The Information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the humanities. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(4), 324-331.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Beagle, D. (1999). Conceptualizing an information commons. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(2), 82-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(99)80003-2
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Beagle, D. (2010). Emergent information commons: Philosophy, models, and 21st century learning paradigms. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 7-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930820903422347
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Beatty, S. (2010). Information commons, University of Calgary: Providing service through collaboration and integration. Journal of Library Administration, 50(2), 145-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930820903455008
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Bennett, S. (2003). Libraries designed for learning. Coucile on the Library and Information Resources. Washington D.C.
|
7 |
Bordonaro, K. (2013). Internationalization and the North American University Library. Scarecrow Press.
|
8 |
Bryant, J., Matthews. G., & Walton, G. (2009). Academic libraries and social and learning space: A case study of Loughborough University Library, UK. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 41(1), 7-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000608099895
DOI
|
9 |
Callinan., J. E. (2005). Information-seeking behaviour of undergraduate biology students: A comparative analysis of first year and final year students in University College Dublin. Library Review, 54(2), 86-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510583039
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Campbell, D. E., & Shlechter, T. M. (1979). Library design influences on user behavior and satisfaction. Library Quarterly, 49(1), 26-41.
DOI
|
11 |
Cullen, R. (2001). Perspectives on user satisfaction surveys. Library Trends, 49(2), 662-686.
|
12 |
Fister, B. (2004). Common ground: Libraries and learning. Library Issues: Briefings for Faculty and Administrators, 25(1). Retrieved from http://libraryissues.com/sub/LI250001.asp
|
13 |
George, C., Bright, A., Hurlbert, T., Linke, E.C., St. Clair, G. & Stein, J. (2006). Scholarly use of information: Graduate students' information seeking behavior. Information Research, 11(4), paper 272. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/11-4/paper272.html
|
14 |
Gibbons, S. (2013). Techniques to understand the changing needs of library users. IFLA Journal, 39(2), 162-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0340035212472846
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Given, L., & Leckie, G. (2003). "Sweeping" the library: Mapping the social activity space of the public library. Library & Information Science Research, 25(4), 365-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00049-5
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Halbert, M. (2010). The information commons: A platform for innovation. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 67-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930820903422107
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Lippincoat, J. K. (2010). Information commons: Meeting millennials' needs. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 27-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930820903422156
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Hartmann. E. (2001). Understanding of information literacy: The perception of first year undergraduate students at the University of Ballarnt. Austrailian Academic and Research Libraries, 32(2), 110-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2001.10755150
DOI
|
19 |
Hiller, S. (2002). How differenct are they? A comparison by academic area of library use, priorities and information needs at the University of Washington. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 33, article 1. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/02-winter/article1.html [cited 2012.6.25]
|
20 |
Lippincott, J. K., & Oblinger, D. G. Ed. (2006). Learning spaces. Washington DC: Educase.
|
21 |
Longhurst, R. (2003). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In: N. Clifford & G. Valentine (Eds), Key methods in geography, pp. 117-132 (London: Sage).
|
22 |
MacWhinnie, L. A. (2003). The information commons: The academic library of the future. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 241-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0040
DOI
|
23 |
Malenfant, C. (2006). The information commons as a collaborative workspace. Reference Services Review, 34(2), 279-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907320610669506
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Mandel, L. (2010). Toward an understanding of library patron wayfinding: Observing patrons' entry routes in a public library. Library and Information Science Research, 32(2), 116-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.12.004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Seal, R. (2005). The information commons: New pathways to digital resources and knowledge management. In Proceedings of the 3rd China-U.S. Library Conference (Shanghia, China), 67-75.
|
26 |
Whitchurch, M. J. (2010). Planning an information commons. Journal of Library Administration, 50(1), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930820903422370
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Sommer, B., & Sommer, R. (1997) A practical guide to behavioral research: Tools and techniques (4th ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
|
28 |
Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 5, 147-158. Retrieved from www.ethnobotanyjournal.org/vol5/i1547-3465-05-147.pdf
DOI
|