Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.3.007

Bridging Gaps in College Students' Source Perception and Use  

Kim, Kyung-Sun (School of Library and Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Yoo-Lee, EunYoung (School of Library and Information Sciences, North Carolina Central University)
Kwon, Nahyun (Department of Library & Information Science, Myongji University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.30, no.3, 2013 , pp. 7-21 More about this Journal
Abstract
The study examines two aspects that relate to undergraduates' selection and use of information sources for their academic assignments: (1) sources perceived useful vs. sources frequently used, and (2) source characteristics considered important as selection criteria vs. selection criteria used as reflected in characteristics of frequently used sources. A survey of 251 undergraduate students attempted to address the gaps between what students think they should do and what they actually do with regard to source selection. Characteristics of frequently used sources were analyzed to find out the criteria used for source selection. Friends/family were among the frequently used sources although they were not perceived as useful. Unlike other sources suffering gaps between the perceived usefulness and the use behavior, Web sources were the ones not only perceived most useful but also used most frequently. When the important selection criteria were compared with the characteristic of sources used often, students did not seem to actually use the selection criteria they thought important. While students considered some characteristics related to information quality (e.g., accuracy, comprehensiveness) as important criteria for source selection, the actual criteria they applied for choosing information sources could be described as 'convenient' or 'accessible' (e.g., efficient/time saving, easy to use, familiar, accessible). Based on the findings, suggestions were made to help bridge such gaps through information literacy programs and information systems design.
Keywords
information use; source selection; college students; information literacy; selection criteria; source perception;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Scoyoc, A., & Cason, C. (2006). The electronic academic library: Undergraduate research behavior in a library without books. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(1), 47-58. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/pla/v006/6.1van_scoyoc.html   DOI
2 Tang, R., Hsieh-Yee, I., & Zhang, S. (2007). User perceptions of metaLib combined search: An investigation of how users make sense of federated searching Internet. Reference Services Quarterly, 12(1&2), 211-236.
3 Tomeo, M. L. (2012). Adding users to the Website design process. Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 350-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2012.730414   DOI
4 Tversky, A., & Fox, C. (2000). Weighing risk and uncertainty. In Choices, values and frames, New York: Russell Sage Foundation. (pp. 93-117).
5 University of Chicago (2013). Library's online catalog: http://lens.lib.uchicago.edu/
6 Valentine, B. (1993). Undergraduate research behavior: Using focus groups to generate theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19(5), 300-304.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Warwick, C., Rimmer, J., Blandford, A., Gow, J., & Buchanan, G. (2009). Cognitive economy and satisficing in information seeking: A longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2402-2415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21179   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Yoon, J-O. (2004). Information seeking in context: content analysis of information search by college students. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(2), 199-218.   과학기술학회마을
9 Young, N., & Seggern, M. (2001). General information seeking in changing times. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 41(2), 159-169.
10 Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
11 Lee, J.-M. (2010). Seeking and using information sources by college students: Comparisons of information seeking in everyday life and during elections. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 36(1), 41-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.117
12 Lim, S. (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 60(11), 2089-2202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21142   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Mann, T. (1987). A guide to library research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
14 Nagy, A. (2011). Analyzing the next-generation catalog. Library Technology Reports, 47(7), 5-28.
15 North Carolina State University (2013). Library's online catalog. Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/catalog/index.html
16 Rockman, I. F. (2004). Information literacy into the higher education curriculum: Practical models for transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17 OCLC. (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/reports/pdfs/Percept_all.pdf
18 Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies of the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17, 10-28.   DOI
19 Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
20 Rogers, J. (2010). Some thoughts on federated search. Posted in attempting elegance. Retrieved from http://rogersurbanek.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/some-thoughts-on-federated-search/
21 Ruddock, B., & Hartley, D. (2010). How UK academic libraries choose metasearch systems. Aslib Proceedings, 62(1), 85-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00012531011015226   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Hamilton, L. (2008). Embedding information literacy into the prehospital care curriculum. Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 6(1), Article 3. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/vol6/iss1/3/
23 Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2009). Lessons learned: How college students seek information in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report, University of Washington's Information School. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2009_finalv_YR1_12_2009v2.pdf
24 Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010a). How today's college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15(3). Retrieved from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2830/2476
25 Kim, K., & Sin, S. (2007). Perception and selection of information sources by undergraduate students: Effects of avoidant style, confidence, and personal control in problem-solving. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(6), 655-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.012   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010b). Truth be told: How college students evaluate and use information in the digital age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report, University of Washington's Information School. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/pdfs/PIL_Fall2010_Survey_FullReport1.pdf
27 Himmelfarb, S. (1993). The measurement of attitudes. In A.H. Eagly & S. Chaiken (Eds.), Psychology of Attitudes, 23-88. Thomson/Wadsworth.
28 Holiday, W., & Li, Q. (2004). Understanding the Millennials: Updating our knowledge about students. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 356-365.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Kuhlthau, C., Heinstrom, J., & Todd, R. (2008). ISP revisited: Is the ISP-model still useful. Information Research, 13(4). paper 355. Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper355.html
30 Lee, H.-L. (2008). Information structures and undergraduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3), 211-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.03.004   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Gardner, S., & Eng., S. (2005). What students want: Generation Y and the changing function of the academic library. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 5(3), 405-420. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/pla/   DOI
32 Burton, V., & Chadwick, S. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use criteria for use of internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17(3), 309-328.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Cox, C. (2007). Hitting the spot: Marketing federated searching tools to students and faculty. Serials Librarian, 53(3), 147-164.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Davis, P. (2003). Effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholarship in a Networked age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 41-51.   DOI
35 Generation Y. (August 30, 1993). Ad Age, p. 16.d.
36 Gerstberger, P., & Allen, T. (1968). Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(4), 272-279.   DOI