Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.207

Examining the Intellectual Structure of a Medical Informatics Journal with Author Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis  

Heo, Go Eun (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
Song, Min (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.30, no.2, 2013 , pp. 207-225 More about this Journal
Abstract
Due to the development of science and technology, the convergence of various disciplines has been fostered. Accordingly, interdisciplinary studies have increasingly been expanded by integrating knowledge and methodology from different disciplines. The primary focus of biblimetric methods is on investigating the intellectual structure a field, and analysis of the characterization of interdisciplinary studies is overlooked. In this study, we aim to identify the intellectual structure of the field of medical informatics through author co-citation analysis and co-word analysis by the representative journal "IEEE ENG MED BIOL." In addition, we examine authors and MeSH Terms of top three representative journals for further analysis of the field. We examine the intellectual structure of the medical informatics field by author and word clusters to identify the network structure of medical informatics disciplines.
Keywords
medical informatics; author co-citation analysis; co-word analysis; network analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 이재윤 (2006a). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2006.40.3.191   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
2 이재윤 (2006b). 지적구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
3 정호연, 정영미 (2007). 학술지 인용과 웹 링크 분석을 통한 과학기술분야의 학제성 비교 연구. 정보관리학회지, 24(3), 179-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.3.179   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 14(5), 619-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.05.003   DOI   ScienceOn
5 An, X. Y., & Wu, Q. Q. (2011). Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics, 88(1), 133-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0374-1   DOI
6 Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping of the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan.
7 Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1993). Historical scientometrics?: Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 27(2), 119-143.   DOI
8 DeShazo, J. P., LaVallie, D. L., & Wolf, F. M. (2009). Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of "Medical Informatics" in MeSH. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 9(7), 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/9/7/   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Haux, R. (2010). Medical informatics: Past, present, future. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(9), 599-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.003   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Grassberger, P., & Procaccia, I. (1983). Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 9(1), 189-208.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133-159.
12 Kenefick, C., & Werner, S. E. (2011). Bibliometric study of medical reference services quarterly, 1982-2009. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 30(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.540204   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Klein, J. T., & Newell, W. H. (1998). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In W. H. Newell (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature (pp. 3-22). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
14 Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20614   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Milojevic, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933-1953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21602   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Liang, H. N. (2010). Overview of the health informatics research field: A bibliometric approach. Proceedings of the First IMIA/IFIP Joint Symposium on E-Health. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Volume 335, 37-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15515-4_5   DOI
17 Liu, G. Y., Hu, J. M., & Wang, H. L. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0586-4   DOI
18 Malin, B., & Carley, K. (2007). A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of medical informatics and bioinformatics journals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(3), 340-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2228   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010529114941   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Morris, T. A., & McCain, K. W. (1998). The structure of medical informatics journal literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5(5), 448-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050448   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1998). Interdisciplinarity in Science and Technology. Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. OECD, Paris.
23 Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Rip, A., & Courtial, J. P. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6(6), 381-400.   DOI
25 Schuemle, M. J., Talmon, J. L., Moorman, P. W., & Kors, J. A. (2009). Mapping the domain of medical informatics. Methods of Information in Medicine, 48(1), 76-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3414/ME0576   DOI
26 Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27 Theiler, J. (1987). Efficient algorithm for estimating the correlation dimension from a set of discrete points. Physical Review A, 36(9), 4456-4462.   DOI
28 Uzun, A. (2002). Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: A brief bibliometric perspective. International Information & Library Review, 34(1), 21-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Van Bemmel, J. H. (1984). The structure of medical informatics. Medical Informatics, 9(3/4), 175-180.   DOI
30 Van Bemmel, J. H., & Musen, M. A. (1997). Handbook of medical informatics. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
31 White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Zhao, L. M., & Zhang, Q. P. (2011). Mapping knowledge domains of Chinese digital library research output, 1994-2010. Scientometrics, 89(1), 51-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0428-4   DOI
33 Zong, Q. J., Shen, H. Z., Yuan, Q. J., Hu, X. W., Hou, Z. P., & Deng, S. G. (2013). Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94(2), 781-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0799-1   DOI