| 1 |
Shcuman, H. and S. Presser. 1981. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. New York: Academic Press.
|
| 2 |
Sheehan, B. K. and J. S. McMillan. 1999. "Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration." Journal of Advertising Journal, 39(4): 45-54.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 3 |
Stewart, T. J., E. Roberts, P. Eleazer, R. Boland, and D. Widland. 2006. "Reliability and validity issues for two common measures of medical students' attitudes toward older adults." Educational Gerontology, 32: 409-421.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 4 |
Weems, G. H., A. J. Onwuegbuzie, J. B. Schreiber, and S. J. Eggers. 2003. "Characteristics of respondents who respond differently to positively and negatively worded items on rating scales." Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28: 587-607.
DOI
|
| 5 |
Wildt, A. R. and M. B. Mazis. 1978. "Determinants of scale responses: Label versus position." Journal of Marketing Research, XV: 261-267.
|
| 6 |
Worcester, R. M. and T. R. Burns. 1975. "A statistical examination of the relative precision of verbal scales." Journal of Market Research Society, 17(3): 181-197.
DOI
|
| 7 |
Wyatt, R. C. and L. S. Meyers. 1987. "Psychometric properties of four 5-point Likert-type scales." Educational and Phychologicla Measurement, 47: 27-35.
DOI
|
| 8 |
Yammarino, F. J., S. J. Skinner, and T. L. Childers. 1991. "Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis." Public Opinion Quarterly, 55: 613-639.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 9 |
Yun, G. W. and C. W. Trumbo. 2000. "Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, & web form." Journal of Market Research Society, 6(1): 235-239.
|
| 10 |
Dillman, D. A. and J. Tarnai. 1988. "Administrative issues in mixed mode surveys." In R. M. Groves, P. P. Biemer, L. E. Lyberg, J. T. Massey, W. L. Nicholls, II & J. Wakesberg (Eds.), Telephone survey methodology (pp. 509-528). New York: Wiley.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 11 |
Noh, Y. 2010a. "A study on developing evaluation criteria for electronic resources in evaluation indicators of libraries." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1): 41-52. .
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 12 |
Noh, Y. 2010b. "A study on designing of metadata for constructing the Library Map Information System." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3): 241-264.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 13 |
Quinn, S. B. and W. A. Belson. 1969. The Effects of Reversing of the Order of Presentation of Verbal Rating Scales in Survey Interviews. London: Survey Research Centre.
|
| 14 |
Noh, Y. 2010c. "A Study on Metadata Elements for Web-based Reference Resources System Developed through Usability Testing." Library Hi Tech, 29(2): 242-265. .
|
| 15 |
Payne, J. D. 1971. "The effects of reversing the order of verbal rating scales in a postal survey." Journal of the Market Research Society, 14: 30-44.
|
| 16 |
Payne, S. L. 1951. The Art of Asking Questions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
|
| 17 |
Ruggg, D. and H. Cantril. 1944. "The wording of questions." In H. Cantril (Ed.) Gauging public opinion. Princeton: Princeton University Press
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 18 |
Schwarz, N. B., H. J. Knauper, E. Hippler, E. Noelle- Neumann, and L. Clark. 1991. "Rating scales: Numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels." Public Opinion Quarterly, 55: 570-582.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 19 |
Schwarz, N., H. J. Hippler, and E. Noelle-Neumann. 1992. "A cognitive model of response-order effects in survey measurement." In N. Schwarz& S. Sudman (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research (pp. 187-199). New York: Springer-Verlag.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 20 |
Sedlmeier, P. 2006. "The role of scales in student ratings." Learning and Instruction, 16: 401- 415.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 21 |
Jacoby, J. and M. S. Matell. 1971. "Three-point Likert scales are good enough." Journal of Marketing Research, 8: 495-500.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 22 |
James, J. and R. Bolstein. 1992. "Large monetary incentives and their effect on mail survey response rates." Public Opinion Quarterly, 56: 442-53.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 23 |
Likert, R. 1932. "A technique for the measurement of attitudes." Archives in Psychology, 140: 1-55.
DOI
|
| 24 |
Komorita, S. S. 1963. "Attitude content, intensity and the neutral point on a Likert scale." Journal of Social Psychology, 61: 327-334.
DOI
|
| 25 |
Krosnick, J. A. and D. F. Alwin. 1987. "An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement." Public Opinion Quarterly, 51: 201-209.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 26 |
Kulas, J. T., A. A. Stachowski, and B. A. Haynes. 2008. "Middle response function in Likert-responses to personality items." Journal of Business Psychology, 22: 251-259.
DOI
|
| 27 |
Matell, M. S. and J. Jacoby. 1972. "Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties." Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6): 506- 509.
DOI
|
| 28 |
McFadden, L. S. and S. E. Krug. 1984. "Psychometric function of the "neutral" response option in clinical personality scales." Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 7: 25-33.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 29 |
Mueller, J. E. 1970. "Choosing among 133 candidates." Public Opinion Quarterly, 34: 395-402.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 30 |
Nicholls, M. R., C. A. Orr, M. Okubo, and A. Loftus. 2006. "Satisfaction guaranteed: The effect of spatial biases on responses to Likert scales." Psychological Science, 17: 1027-1028.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 31 |
De Leeuw, E. D. 1992. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone, and Face-to-face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT Publications.
|
| 32 |
Dillman, D. A. 1999. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
|
| 33 |
Garland, R. 1991. "The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable?" Marketing Bulletin, 2: 66-70, Research Note 3.
DOI
|
| 34 |
Everett, S. A., J. H. Price, A. Bedell, and S. K. Telljohann. 1997. "The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians." Eval Health Professions, 20: 207-4.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 35 |
Fox, R. J., M. R. Crask, and J. Kim. 1988. "Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for introducing response." Public Opinion Quarterly, 52: 467-491.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 36 |
Friedman, H. H., Y. Wilamowsky, and L. W. Friedman.1981. "A comparison of balanced and unbalanced rating scales." The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 19(2): 1-7.
|
| 37 |
Goldberg, L. R. 1981. "Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3): 517-552.
DOI
|
| 38 |
Green, B. F. 1969. "Attitude measurement." In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
DOI
|
| 39 |
Guy, R. F. and M. Norvell. 1977. "The neutral point on a Likert scale." Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 95(2): 199-204.
DOI
|
| 40 |
Hartley, J. and L. R. Betts. 2010. "Four layouts and a finding: The effects of changes in the order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert-type scales." International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1): 17-27.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 41 |
Bignami-Van Assche, S. G., G. Reniers, and A. A. Weinreb. 2003. "An assessment of the KDICP and MDICP data quality." Demographic Research, S1(2): 31-76.
DOI
|
| 42 |
Beck, J. 1996. Career anchors, organizational commitment, and job plateaus: An analysis of hotel executive operating committee members' career development. (Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(03). (Publication Number: AAT 9725508).
|
| 43 |
Becker, S. L. 1954. "Why an order effect." Public Opinion Quarterly, 18: 271-278.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 44 |
Belson, W. A. 1966. "The effects of reversing the presentation order of verbal rating scales." Journal of Advertising Research, 6: 30-376.
|
| 45 |
Brook, D. and G. J. Upton. 1974. "Primacy effects in single trial free recall." Applied Statistics, 23: 414-419.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 46 |
Carp, F. M. 1974. "Position effects on interview response." Journal of Gerontology, 29: 581-587.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 47 |
Church, A. H. 1993. "Estimating the effect of incentive on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis." Public Opinion Quarterly, 57: 62-79.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
| 48 |
Cobanoglu, C. B. Warde, and P. J. Moreo. 2001. "A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods." International Journal of Market Research, 43(4): 441-452.
|
| 49 |
Cummins, R. A. and E. Gullone. 2000. "Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement." Proceedings, Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Singapore: National University of Singapore, 74-93.
|
| 50 |
Dawes, J. 2008. "Do data characteristics change according to the number of points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales." International Journal of Market Research, 50: 61-77.
DOI
|
| 51 |
Armstong, R. L. 1987. "The midpoint on a five-point Likert-type scale." Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64: 359-362.
DOI
|
| 52 |
Amoo, T. and H. H. Friedman. 2001. "Do numeric values influence subjects' responses to rating scales?" Journal of International Marketing and Marketing Research, 26: 41-46.
|
| 53 |
Armitage, C. and C. Deeprose. 2004. "Changing student evaluations by means of the numeric values of rating scales." Psychology Learning and Teaching, 3: 122-125.
DOI
|
webmaster
