Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.295

An Exploratory Study on the Study Trend of Domestic Entrepreneurship Using Co-word Analysis Method  

Kim, Young-Su (숭실대학교 벤처중소기업학과)
Ko, Jong-Nam (숭실대학교 벤처중소기업학과)
Do, Man-Seung (숭실대학교 벤처중소기업학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.28, no.3, 2011 , pp. 295-312 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study conducted time-series analysis on domestic studies related to entrepreneurship for more than last 50 years by integrating the co-word analysis method of intellectual structure analysis into the study of entrepreneurship. The co-word analysis method is a quantitative analysis method to analyze the overall trend of the study and further study topics by visualizing the information between study topics and arranging the topics on two-dimensional plane and the study result showed largely four phases and the direction of the study path. According to the analysis, the study is started at embryonic study phase(third quadrant), the study topic of independent study phase(second quadrant) is a phase to be a settled independent area as a study and the topics of the study include topics of the study reflecting the situation of the times. At growing study phase(first quadrant) study topics which are closely related to the study topic are arranged, and the topics, the center of the study, are positioned at the study topics of maturity phase(4th quadrant).
Keywords
entrepreneurship; co-word Analysis; strategy map; bibliometrics; intellectual structure;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Nederhof, A. J. and van Wijk E. 1997. "Mapping the social and behavioral sciences worldwide: Use of maps in portfolio analysis of national research efforts." Scientometrics, 40(2): 237-276.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Noyons, E, C. M., and A. F. J. van Raan. 1998. "Advance mapping of science and technology." Scientometrics, 41(1-2): 61-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Qin, He. 1999. "Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis." LIBRARY TRENDS,48(1): 133-159.
4 Small, H. 1999. "Visualizing science by citation mapping." Journal of the America Society for Information Science, 50: 799- 813.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Tijssen, R. J .W. and A. F. J. van Raan. 1989. "Mapping co-word structures: a comparison of multidimentional scaling and leximappe." Scientometrics, 15: 283-295.   DOI
6 Van Rann, A. F. J. and Tijssen, R. J. W. 1993. "The neural net of neural network research." Scientometrics, 26(1): 169- 192.   DOI
7 Voutilainen, A. 1993. "Nptool. A detector of english noun phrases. in: Proceedings of the workshop on very large corpora." Columbus, Ohio State University, June 22.
8 Wortman, M. S. Jr. 1987. "Entrepreneurship: An integrating typology and evaluation of the empirical research in the field." Journal of Management, 13(2): 259-279.   DOI
9 Whittaker, J. 1989. "Creativity and conformity in science: Titles, keywords and coword analysis." Social Studies of Science, 19: 473-496.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 이우형, 김윤명, 박각로, 이명호. 2006. Co-word Analysis을 통한 신기술 분야 도식화 방법에 관한 연구. 경영과학, 23(3): 77-93.
11 이재윤. 2006. 지적 구조의 규명을 위한 네트워크 형성 방식에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2): 333-355.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
12 한국과학정보기술원. 2008. KnowledgeMatrix 를 활용한 정보분석.
13 Callon, M., J. P. Courtial, and F. Laville. 1991. "Co-word analysis as tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry." Scientometrics, 22(1): 153-203.
14 Courtial, J-P. and J. Law. 1989. "A co-word study of artificial intelligence." Social Studies of Science(London), 19: 301- 311.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Ding, Y., G. G. Chowdhury, and S. Foo. 2001. "Bibliography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis." Information Processing & Management, 37: 817-842.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 King, J. 1987. "A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation." Journal of Information Science, 13: 261-276.   DOI
17 Law, J., S. Bauin, J-P. Courtial, and J. Whittaker. 1988. "Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification." Scientometrics, 14(3-4):251-264.   DOI
18 Law, J. and J. Whittaker. 1992. "Mapping acidification research: A test of the coword method." Scientometrics, 23(3): 7-17.
19 Leydesdorff, L. 1997. "Why words and cowords cannot map the development of the science." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 4(5): 418-427.
20 McCain, K. W. 1990. "Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 433-443.   DOI
21 강임철. 2005. 동시출현 단어분석을 통한 도메인 기초 온톨로지 개발 에이전트. 박사학위논문, 전남대학교 대학원.
22 김영수, 고종남. 2009. 사내기업가정신이 기업의 급진적 혁신에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구. 상업교육연구, 23(3): 489-520.
23 김종관. 1994. 기업가정신의 개념과 연구접근 방법. 동남경영, 9: 27-52.
24 남기성. 2010. SPSS18을 이용한 통계분석은 어떻게?. 파주: 자유아카데미.
25 남영호. 1994. 기업가정신이란 무엇인가? 사회 과학연구, 4: 145-163.
26 노재구. 1999. 기업가 및 기업가정신에 관한 이 론적 고찰. 충북개발연구, 10(2): 183- 214.
27 박재린. 1996. 기업성장과 기업가정신의 관한 연구. 동림경영연구, 4: 23-45.
28 배종태, 차민석, 2005. 기업가정신과 벤처경영 부문의 연구동향- 한국과 미국의 학술지 비교 분석(1998-2004). 벤처경영연구, 8(3): 57-94.
29 유영준. 2003. 문헌정보학의 지식구조에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교.
30 이방래, 여운동, 이준영, 이창환, 권오진, 문영호. 2008. 계량정보학시스템으로서의 Knowledge Matrix 개발. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 8(1): 68-74.