Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.239

A Study of Human Resource Practices Affecting Knowledge Sharing and Utilization in Public Organization  

Lee, Hyang-Soo (건국대학교 사회과학대학 행정학부)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.28, no.3, 2011 , pp. 239-256 More about this Journal
Abstract
Main drivers of knowledge activities such as knowledge sharing and utilization are individual members of an organization and thus knowledge management strategies should be discussed in relationships with human resource management. This study analyzes the effects on knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization of human resource management practices such as training, participation in decision-making, performance appraisal and compensation system in local government. The results show that training and performance appraisal and compensation system are significantly influential factors for the knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization. Lessons and implications of this study for management leadership are presented.
Keywords
education & training; participation in dicision-making; apprasal & compensation; knowledge sharing; knowledge utilization;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wright, M., R. E. Hoskisson, I. Filatotchev. and T. Buck. 1998. "Revitalizing privatized russian enterprises." Academy of Management Executive, 12(2): 74-75.   DOI
2 Yahya, S. and W. Goh. 2002. "Managing human rosource toward achieving knowledge management." Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5): 457-468.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lopez, S. P., J. M. M. Peon and C. J. V. Orda. 2005. "Human resource practices, organizational learning and business performance." Human Resource Development International, 8(2): 147-164.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 McLagan, P. A. 1989. Flexible job models: A productivity strategy for the information age. In J. P. Campbell and R. J. Campbell & Associates. Productivity in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5 Ruggles, R. 1998. "The state of the notion: Knowledge management in practice." California Management Review, 40(3).
6 Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge- Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
7 Pfeffer, J. 1999. "Seven practices of successful organizations." California Management Review, 40(2): 96-123.
8 Robertson, M. and G. M. Hammersley. 2000. "Knowledge management practices within a knowledge-intensive firm: The significance of the people management dimension." Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(2/3/4): 241-253.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Scholtes, P. R. 1993. "Total quality or performance appraisal: Choose one." National Productivity Review, 12(3): 349-363.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Soliman, F. and K. Spooner. 2000. "Strategies for implementing knowledge management: Role of human resources management." Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4): 337-345.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Van der Spek and A. Spijkervet. 1997. "Knowledge management: Dealing intelligently with knowldge." In Liebowitz & Wilcox, eds., Knowledge management and Its Integrative Elements. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12 Wiig, K. M. 1999. "Introducing knowledge management into the enterprise," in Liebowitz, J. ed., Knowledge Management Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. III-7-19.
13 Collins, C. J. and K. G. Smith. 2006. "Knowldge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms." Academy of Management Journal, 49 (3): 544-560.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Davenport, T. 1995. "Some Principles of Knowledge Management." Business and Strategy, September: 34-41.
15 Gold, A., A. Malhotra and A. Segars. 2001. "Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective." Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 185-214.   DOI
16 Davenport, T. and L. Prusak. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17 Delaney, John T. and M. A. Huselid. 1996. "The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance." Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949-469.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Garavan, T. N., P. Gunnigle and M. Morley. 2000. "Contemporary HRD research: A triarchy of theoretical perspectives and their prescriptions for HRD." Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(2/3/4): 65-93   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Gooijer, F. D. 2000. "Designing a knowledge management performance framework." Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4): 303-310.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Hale, J. and G. Bailey. 1998. "Seven dimensions of successful reward plans." Compensation & Benefits Review, 30(4): 71-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Hansen, M. T., N. Nohria and T. Tierry. 1999. "What's your strategy for managing knowledge." Harvard Business Review, March-April, 209-228.
22 Hansen, M. T. 2002. "Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies." Organization Science, 13(3): 232-248.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Hatten, K. J. and S. R. Rosenthal. 2001. Reaching for the Knowledge Edge. American Management Association, AMACOM.
24 Alavi, M. and D. Leidner. 2001. "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues." MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 107-136.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Beach, D. S. 1980. Personnel: The Management of People at Work, 4th ed. New York: McMillan Publishing.
26 Baron, J. N. and D. M. Kreps. 1999. Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
27 Baum, J. A. C. and P. Ingram. 1998. "Survival- enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898-1980." Management Science, 44: 996-1016.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Bavon, S. 1995. "Innovation in Performance Measurement Systems." International Journal of Public Administration, 18(2): 491-519.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Bhatt, G. D. 2001. "Knowledge Management in Organizations: Examining the Interaction Between Technologies, Techniques, and People." Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1): 68-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Bock, G. and Y. G. Kim. 2002. "Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing." Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2): 14-21.
31 Bramley, P. 1991. Evaluating Training Effectiveness- Translating Theory into Practice.London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
32 Brown, T. 1998. "Ringing up Intellectual Capital." Management Review, 87(1): 47-52.
33 Cascio, W. F. and E. M. Awad. 1981. Human Resources Management: An Information Systems Approach. Reston Pub. Co.(Reston, Va.).
34 Civi, E. 2000. "Knowledge management as a competitive asset: A review." Market ing Intellectual Capital, 1(4): 366-380.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 빅토리아, 박동진. 2009. 직무관련 지식의 공유에 영향을 미치는 요인. 한국경영정보, 11(2): 179-194.   과학기술학회마을
36 강성철, 김판석, 이종수, 최근열, 하태권. 2008. 새인사행정론. 서울: 대영문화사.
37 고영만. 2002. 지식의 효율적 공유를 위한 지식관리체제 구축방안 연구. 교육인적자원부.
38 문명상, 하은호. 1999. 회귀분석. 서울: 민영사.
39 이도형. 2007. 정부의 전략적 인적자원관리. 서울: 북코리아.
40 이재규, 김진극, 김동조. 2008. 지식경영시대의 인적자원관리. 서울: 문영사.
41 이정호, 김영걸, 김민용. 2006. 지식활동이 조직성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 지식창출활동과 지식공유활동을 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 7(1): 13-30.
42 이홍재, 차용진. 2007. 평가 및 보상이 지식창출과 공유활동에 미치는 영향 - 중앙행정기관을 중심으로-. 정보관리학회지, 24(1):55-74.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
43 중앙인사위원회 편. 2005. 사람이 나라의 미래.서울: 나남출판.
44 한국전산원. 1999. 공공기관 지식관리의 전략과 성공요인에 대한 연구. 서울: 한국전산원.
45 한영수, 강인호. 2007. 인사행정론. 서울: 형설 출판사.
46 허문구, 문상미. 2010. 인적자원관리가 지식공유에 미치는 영향: 공유비전과 코드의 매개효과를 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 11(2):57-73.