Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.103

A Study on Application of Resource Types of RDA to KCR4  

Lee, Mi-Hwa (이화여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.28, no.3, 2011 , pp. 103-121 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is to seek to apply resource types of RDA to KCR4. It is difficult to choose appropriate term and to embody FRBR model because GMD of KCR4 is the mixture of content-based vocabularies and carrier-based vocabularies. SMD is to need to reflect the current technological terms. Resource type of RDA was already developed to overcome limitation of AACR2's GMD, and would affect the world cataloging environment, therefore it is need to apply resource type of RDA to Korean cataloging rule. For this study, case study and survey were used. In case study, it was to scan all GMD term for one university library to build by programming and to grape librarian and users' potential need. In the survey by cataloging librarian, it was to figure out the current description of resource type in university library and to test RDA resource type. As a result, it was needed to revise the vocabulary to the obvious and user-understandable list. Also it was different in correction rate in RDA testing by resource type. Based on the case study and the survey, RDA resource type was applied to KCR4 resource list by adding term such as computer game in content type, and by inserting terms such as DVD, CD-ROM, Blu-Ray, computer file in carrier type. It also applied RDA description method and display means to KCR4. This study would apply RDA resource type to KCR4 and contribute to revise KCR4 resource type.
Keywords
FRBR; RDA; AACR2; KCR4; content type; media type; carrier type; GMD; SMD;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Seikel, M. and T. Steele. 2011. "How MARC has changed: the history of the format and its forthcoming relationship to RDA." Technical Services Quarterly, 28: 322-334.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Tillett, B. 2001. General Material Designations (GMDs). [cited 2011.4.5]. .
3 Weihs, J. 2000. General Material Designations in the Twenty-first century. [cited 2011.3.10]. .
4 Weihs, J. and L. Howarth. 2008. "Designating materials: from "germane terms" to element types." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(4): 3-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Yee, M. M. 2007. "FRBR and moving image materials: content versus carrier." In Understanding FRBR(CT: Libraries Unlimited,2007): 117-130. [cited 2011.3.10]. .
6 RDA Test Coordinating Committee. 2011. Report and Recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. [cited 2011.6.30]. .   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Delsey, T. 2006. Categorization of Content and Carrier Terms in RDA. [cited 2011.4.5]. .
8 Dunsire, G. 2007. "Distinguishing content from carrier: the RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization." D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2). [cited 2011.3.10]. .
9 GMD/SMD Working Group. 2005. Content and Carrier Terms in RDA. [cited 2011.3.20]. .
10 Green, R. and N. Fallgren. 2007. "Anticipating new media: A faceted classification of material types." In Proceedings North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization(Toronto: Ontario, 2007): 87-99. [cited 2011.5.9]. .
11 Guerrini, M. 2004. "GMD: Its function and its history." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(2): 61-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Hider, P. 2009a. "A Comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6): 544-560.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Hider, P. 2009b. "Library resource categories and their possible groupings." Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2): 105-115.   DOI
14 JSC for Development of RDA. 2011. RDA: Resource Description and Access. ALA.
15 JSC Format Variation Working Group. 2003. Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of AACR(JSC) Format Variation Working Group. [cited 2011.5.5]. .
16 Kiorgaard, D. 2006. RDA/ONIX Framework for Resource Categorization. [cited 2011.3.15]. .
17 Chung, H. H. 2001. "User-friendly audiovisual material cataloging at Westchester County Public Library System." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 31(3/4): 313-325.   DOI
18 이미화. 2011. KCR4 GMD 및 SMD 기술의 새로운 방향 모색. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 42(2): 237-255.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
19 한국도서관협회. 2003. 한국목록규칙, 제4판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
20 Chapman, A. 2006. "RDA: A new international standard." Ariadne, 49(OCT. 2006). [cited 2011.7.10]. .
21 Delsey, T. 1998. The Logical Structure of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules. [cited 2011.3.10]. .