Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.263

A Study on the Utilization of Business Intelligence and Dashboard in Academic Libraries  

Gu, Jung-Eok (한국기초과학지원연구원 예산팀)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.28, no.1, 2011 , pp. 263-283 More about this Journal
Abstract
Business Intelligence(BI) is being used by the individuals who make decisions for management. Dashboard supports business intelligence by visualizing data, information, and knowledge so that they can be grasped at a glance. In this study, applications of dashboard were analyzed in the ARL libraries websites. Furthermore, the study suggested methods to establish and use the information system of the business intelligence and dashboard on the academic library websites in Korea. The findings of this study are expected to serve as the basic data to utilize the business intelligence and dashboard as a tool with which Korean academic libraries can demonstrate their value to the stakeholders in the academic community.
Keywords
business intelligence; dashboard; service standards; key performance indicators; performance indicatiors;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 University of Virginia Library. .
2 Washington State University Libraries. .
3 Zucca, J. 2008. “Building frameworks of organizational intelligence: strategies and solutions stemming from the Penn Libraries Data Farm Project.” Proceedings of the 2008 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment, 37-42.
4 Ball State University Libraries. .
5 Brigham Young University - Harold B. Lee Library. .
6 Brown University Library. .
7 Buffalo State College - E. H. Butler Library. .
8 Drake University - Cowles Library. .
9 IUPUI University Library. .
10 Monash University Library. .
11 Newcastle University Library. .
12 University of Huddersfield Library..
13 North Carolina State University Libraries. .
14 Radboud University Nijmegen Library. .
15 Regent University Library. .
16 University of Leicester Library. .
17 University of Puget Sound - Collins Memorial Library. .
18 University of Richmond - Boatwright Memorial Library. .
19 University of Tennessee Libraries. .
20 구중억. 2009. 대학도서관의 정보공개 및 공시 실태분석을 통한 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 40(4): 327-351.   과학기술학회마을
21 조희윤. 2006. 대학도서관의 BSC 적용에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(1): 241-262.   과학기술학회마을
22 Bhatnagar, A. 2009. “Web Analytics for Business Intelligence: Beyond Hits and Sessions.” Online, 33(6): 32-35.
23 Hernon P. and Altman E. 1998. Assessing Service Quality: Satisfying the Expectations of Library Customers, ALA: Chicago.
24 Rob, P. and C. Coronel. 2009. Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management, 8th ed. Boston: Thomson/Course Technology.
25 Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
26 Matthews, J. R. 2007. The Evaluation and Measurement of Library Services, Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
27 McLean, N. and C. Wilde. 1991. “Evaluating Library Performance: The Search for Relevance.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 22(3): 198-210.
28 Watson, H. J. 2009. “Tutorial: Business Intelligence -- Past, Present, and Future.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25: 487-510.
29 Wright, S. and L. S. White. 2007. SPEC Kit 303: Library Assessment, Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
30 Yeoh, W. and A. Koronios. 2010. “Critical Success Factors for Business Intelligence Systems.” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(3): 23-32.