Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2022.26.6.567

Analysis of the Effects of Reading Education Using S-PUMA Teaching Method on Elementary Students' Literary Imagination and Computational Thinking  

Eol Sohn (Jeonju National University of Education)
Youngsik Jeong (Jeonju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.26, no.6, 2022 , pp. 567-577 More about this Journal
Abstract
Interest in AI and SW education is growing as digital literacy is emphasized in the revised elementary school curriculum for 2022. There are numerous restrictions on how pupils can enhance their digital literacy because there are only 34 class hours available for information education in elementary schools. Therefore, other subjects and information education must be blended in order to ensure class hours for AI and SW instruction. In this study, we investigated the impact of S-PUMA reading instruction on the literary imagination and computational thinking of elementary school pupils. To conduct this study, two classes of sixth graders in an elementary school were chosen and split into an experimental group and a control group. Over the course of five sessions, only the experimental group received reading instruction using the S-PUMA teaching approach. It was discovered that reading instruction with the S-PUMA teaching methodology enhanced literary imagination and computational thinking. Further study is required to identify whether the improvement in creative imagination, a component of literary imagination, is a result of the S-PUMA teaching approach or a natural result of the subject matter of the lesson.
Keywords
storytelling; PUMA teaching method; literary imagination; computational thinking;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Yi, M. H. (2019). The Impact of Literary Imagination throughReading Modern Poem to 'Self-efficacy.', Unified humanities, 80, 210-237.
2 Bae, Y. G. (2022). Development of the information curriclum in elementary school. 2022 revised practical arts(technical·home economics) curriculum draft development research forum, 22-25. Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation. 
3 Bin, M. Y. (2005). (The)analysis of literary imagination in poetry and novels of the high school Korean language textbook. Doctoral Dissertation, The Graduate School of Kyungnam University Graduate School. 
4 Jeong, Y. S. (2018). The Problems and Improvement of the SW Education Policy in Elementary School, The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 9(1), 91-97. 
5 Joint with Relevant Ministries (2020). Direction and Key Challenges of Education Policy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. 
6 Joint with Relevant Ministries (2022). Digital Talent Development Plan. 
7 Kim, B. S. (2015), A study on the aspects of text-meaning extractedfrom the inference in reading comprehension, Textlinguistic, 38, 1-25 
8 Kim, C. W., Jeong, J. C., & Choi, J. H. (2000). Imagination and teaching literature, Journal of Reading Research, 5(5), 131-193. 
9 Kim, C., Park, N. J., Sung, Y. H., Shin, S. B. & Jeong, Y. S. (2016). Development of Standard Curriculum Model for Information. The Korean Association of Information Education. 
10 Kim, S. H. & Jeong, Y. S. (2018). Exploring a Method of Physical Programming Education using Story-based PUMA Model. The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 9(2), 117-122. 
11 Kim, S. H. & Jeong, Y. S. (2019). An Effect Analysis of Storytelling-based Programming Education, The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 10(2), 181-186. 
12 Lee, H. Y. & Chin, Y. E. (2014). Trend of Imagination Studies and Re-characterizing of Imagination Types, Journal of LearnerCentered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(7), 281-308. 
13 Lee, M. J. (2014). A Study on Enhancing Literary Imagination though Storytelling. 47-57. Master's Thesis, The Graduate School of Busan National University
14 Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 Revised Elementary School Korean Language Curriculum. 
15 Ministry of Education. (2022). Elementary School Curriculum Practical (Technology․Home Economics)/Information Curriculum, Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-74 [Attachment 10]. 
16 Oh, E. J. & Jeong, Y. S. (2018). A Case Study of T-PUMA Teaching and Learning Model using Traditional Fairy Tales. The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 9(2), 163-167. 
17 Seo, H. S. & Jeong, Y. S. (2018). The Effects of Writing to Describe using Block-based Programming on Computational Thinking and Writing Skills. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 23(6), 665-674. 
18 Wing, M. J. (2011). Computational Thinking, OurCS Workshop. Carnegie Mellon University. 
19 Shin, H. J. & Kim, J. E. (2010). A Study on Fairy Tale Teaching Methods for Enhancing Literary Imagination, The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(2), 149-168.    DOI
20 Woo, H. Y. (1998). On the Education Literary Symbol, Korean Language Education, 97, 67-90.