Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2022.26.4.249

Effects of AI-Based Personalized Adaptive Learning System in Higher Education  

Cho, Yooncheong (KDI School of Public Policy and Management)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.26, no.4, 2022 , pp. 249-263 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of assessment by adopting adaptive learning in higher education that are rarely examined in previous studies. In particular, this study applied research questions: 1) How does technical perception, perceived contents and features, and perceived integration of the AI-based adaptive system with lecture affect overall satisfaction, overall effectiveness, overall usefulness, overall motivation for the study, and intention to use it with other classes? 2) How do overall satisfaction, overall effectiveness, overall usefulness, motivation for the class, and intention to use affect loyalty on the AI-based adaptive system? This study conducted online surveys after the completion of the classes adopted AI-based adaptive learning system, ALEKS. This study applied ANOVA, regression, and factor analyses. The results of this study found that perceived integration of the AI-based adaptive learning system with the lectures on overall satisfaction, effectiveness, motivation, and intention to use for other classes showed significant with higher effect size. The results of this study provides implication that the AI-based learning system help improve learning outcomes in graduate level studies. The results provide policy and managerial implications that the AI-based adaptive learning system should improve better customer relationships in higher education.
Keywords
AI-Based Adaptive Learning; Higher Education; Customer Relationship Management; Satisfaction; Loyalty;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Acampora, G., Gaeta, M., & Loia, V. (2011). Combining Multi-agent Paradigm and Memetic Computing for Personalized and Adaptive Learning Experiences. Computational Intelligence Journal, 27(2), 141-165.   DOI
2 Albert, D., Schrepp, M., & Held, T. (1994). Construction of knowledge spaces for problemsolving in chess. In G. H. Fischer, & D. Laming (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics, and methodology (pp. 123-135). Recent Research in Psychology. New York, USA: Springer New York.
3 Albert, D., & Mori, T. (2001). Contributions of Cognitive Psychology to the Future of E-Learning. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, 1(50), Learning and Curriculum Development, 25-34.
4 Doignon, J. P., & Falmagne, J.C. (1985). Spaces for the assessment of knowledge. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23, 175-196.   DOI
5 Elliott, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005) Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
6 El-Sabagh & Hamed, E. (2020). The Relationship between Learning-Styles and Learning Motivation of Students at Umm Al-Qura University. Journal of Egyptian Association for Educational Computer, 8(1), 1-28.
7 El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive E-Learning Environment based on Learning Styles and its Impact on Development Students' Engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(53), 1-24.   DOI
8 Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analyzing Feedback Processes in an Online Teaching and Learning Environment: An Exploratory Study. Higher Education, 59, 277-292.   DOI
9 Doignon, J. P. & Falmagne, J. C. (1999). Knowledge Spaces. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
10 Nwaogu, E. (2012). The Effeect of Aleks on Students' Mathematics Achievement in an Online Learning Environment and the Cognitive Complexity of the Initial and Final Assessments. Georgia, U.S.: Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University, Georgia, U.S.
11 Okoye, K. (2018). A Systematic Review of Process Modelling Methods and its Application for Personalized Adaptive Learning Systems. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 27(3), 23-46.   DOI
12 Oxman, S. & Wong W. (2014). White Paper: Adaptive Learning Systems. DeVry Education Group and Integrated Education Solutions.
13 Popescu, E, Trigano, P., & Badica, C. (2007). Towards a Unified Learning Style Model in Adaptive Educational Systems. Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. July 18-20, Niigata, Japan. 804-808.
14 Popescu, E. (2008). Dynamic Adaptive Hypermedia Systems for E-learning. France: Doctoral Dissertation, Universite de Technologie de Compiegne, Compiegne, France.
15 Reddy, A. A., & Harper, M. (2013). ALEKS-based Placement at the University of Illinois. In J. Falmagne, D. Albert, C. Doble, D. Eppstein, & X. Hu (Eds.), Knowledge Spaces: Applications in Education (pp.51-68), Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
16 Stokes, T. A., Gillan, D. J., & Braden, G., J. P. (2016). Establishing the Link between Usability and Student Satisfaction in Adaptive Online Learning. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp.1969-1973). September 19-23, Washington, DC. US.
17 Reimann, P., Bull, S., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Vatrapu, R., & Wasson, B. (2016). Measuring and Visualizing Learning in the Information-rich Classroom. New York, US: Routledge.
18 Scalise, K., Bernbaum, D. J., & Timms, M. (2007). Adaptive Technology for E-Learning: Principles and Case Studies of an Emerging Field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2295-2309.   DOI
19 Steiner, C. M., Nussbaumer, A., & Albert, D. (2009). Supporting Self-Regulated Personalized Learning through Competence-based Knowledge Space Theory. P olicy Futures in Education, 7(6), 645-661.   DOI
20 Sullins, J., Meister, R., Craig, S. D., Wilson, W. M., Bargagliotti, A., & Hu, X. (2013). The Impact of a Mathematical Intelligent Tutoring System on Students' Performance on Standardized High-Stake Tests. In J. Falmagne, D. Albert, C. Doble, D. Eppstein, & X. Hu (Eds.), Knowledge Spaces: Applications in Education (pp.69-78), Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
21 Hopkins, D. (2004). Assessment for Personalized Learning: The Quite Revolution. In General Teaching Council Conference, Perspectives on Pupil Assessment (pp.10-15). November 29, London, UK, GTC.
22 Eze, N. (2012). The Effect of Aleks on Students' Mathematics Achievement in an Online Learning Environment and the Cognitive Complexity of the Initial and Final Assessment. Georgia, US: Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Georgia, U.S.
23 Fang, Y., Ren, Z., Hu, X., & Graesser, A. C. (2019) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of ALEKS on learning, Educational Psychology, 39(10), 1278-1292.   DOI
24 Heller, J., Steiner, C., Hockemeyer, C., & Albert, D. (2006). Competence-based Knowledge Structures for Personalized Learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(1), 75-88.
25 Jackson, M. J., Helms, M. M., Jackson, W. T., &Gum, J. R. (2011). Student Expectations of Technology-enhanced Pedagogy: A Ten-year Comparison. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 294-301.   DOI
26 Kerr, P. (2016). Adaptive Learning. ELT Journal, 70(1), 88-93.   DOI
27 Taylor, J. M. (2006). The Effects of a Computerized-Algebra P rogram on Mathematics Achievement of College and University Freshmen Enrolled in a Developmental Mathematics Course. Texas, U.S.: Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, U.S.
28 Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning Styles and Adaptive Flexibility: Testing Experiential Learning Theory. Management Learning, 33(1), 5-33.   DOI
29 National Research Council (2002). Technology and Assessment: Thinking ahead - Proceedings fromthe Workshop. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
30 Normadhi et al., N. B., Shuib, L., Nasir, H. N. M., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2019). Identification of Personal Traits in Adaptive Learning Environment: Systematic Literature Review. Computers & Education, 130, 168-190.   DOI
31 Taylor, D., L., Yeung, M., & Bashet, A. Z. (2021). Personalized and Adaptive Learning. In J. Ryoo, & K. Winkelmann (Eds.), Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward (pp.17-34), New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
32 Verdu, E., Regueras, L. M., Verdu, M. L., De Castro, J. P., & Perez, M. A. (2014). An Analysis of the Research on Adaptive Learning: The Next Generation of E-Learning. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science & Applications, 6(5), 859-868.
33 Webley, K. (2013). The Adaptive Learning Revolution. Time Magazine, June 6, http://nation.time.com/2013.
34 Xu, Y. J., Meyer, J. A., & Morgan, D. D. (2009). A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Using an Online Commercial Tutoring System to Teach Introductory Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(2), 1-16.
35 Doignon, J. P., & Falmagne, J. C. (2016). Knowledge spaces and learning spaces. In W. H. Batchelder, H. Colonius, & E. N. Dzhafarov (Eds.), New Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (pp.274-321), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36 Yang, J., Huang, R., & Li, Y. (2013). Optimizing classroom environment to support technology enhanced learning. In A. Holzinger & G. Pasi (Eds.), Human-computer interaction and knowledge discovery in complex (pp. 275-284), Berlin, Germay: Springer
37 https://www.mheducation.com
38 https://www.aleks.com
39 Albert, D., & Lukas, J. (1999). Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications. London, UK: Psychology Press, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, 1(50), 25-34. Hiroshima, Japan.
40 Cho, Y. (2021). Investigating Factors of Higher Education on Job Satisfaction, Globalization, and Hosting Country. Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 12(2), 7-17.
41 Harati, H., Sujo-Montes, L., Tu, C., Armfield, S. J. W., & Yen, C. (2021). Assessment and Learning in Knowledge Spaces (ALEKS) Adaptive SystemImpact on Students' Perception and Self-Regulated Learning Skills. Education Sciences, 11, 1-21.
42 Sun, Q., Abdourzazkou, Y., & Norman, T. J. (2017). LearnSmart, Adaptive Teaching, and Student Learning Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 92(1), 36-43.   DOI
43 Gifford, B. R. (2001). Transformational Instructional Material, Settings, and Economics. In The Case for the Distributed Learning Workshop. Minneapolis, MN: The Distributed Learning Workshop. 1-71.
44 Law, M. Y. (2021). Student's Attitude and Satisfaction towards Transformative Learning: AResearch Study on Emergency Remote Learning in Tertiary Education. Creative Education, 12, 494-528.   DOI