Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.2.309

Information Domain Curriculum Composition Direction in Subject-Centered Curriculum  

Shin, Soo-Bum (GongJu University of Education)
Han, Kyu-Jung (GongJu University of Education)
Go, Byung-Oh (GongJu University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.25, no.2, 2021 , pp. 309-315 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is about the direction of how to compose the information domain curriculum in the domestic subject matter centered curriculum system. To this end, subject-centered and competency-centered curriculum were compared and analyzed, and how the information domain was organized in two types was suggested. In spite of emphasizing competency, the domestic curriculum was judged to be inclined to the subject-centered curriculum because it emphasized the presentation of national-level educational goals, a subject learning model, and textbooks. As examples of the information domain subject-centered curriculum, the information domain of the elementary practical subject and the middle school information curriculum were presented, and the SW convergence curriculum was presented as an example of a progressive curriculum. Under such circumstances, it was emphasized that in order for the learner to lead a life in an intelligent society in the future through the information domain including SWAI content, it must be explicitly described in a subject-centered perspective with computer science as the parent study.
Keywords
Information curriculum; Curriculum-oriented curriculum; Competency-oriented curriculum; Information education character; SW Integerated edcuation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Choi Soo-jin 5others(2017). A study on OECD Education 2030 project: Analyzing validity of OECD competencies framework and exploring practices of competency-based education in South Korea. Korean Educational Development Institude. Research report RR 2017-18.
2 Deok-Ho Jang(2017). An Exploratory Study for the Direction and Tasks for Innovating School System in the Intelligent Information Society. Journal of Digital Convergence 15(12).
3 Jamie Knowles(2019). Teachers' Essential Guide to Coding in the Classroom Common Sense Education. https://www.commonsense.org/
4 Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity(2020). Elementary School Mathematics Subject 4th class second periods.
5 Korea Natl. Univ. of Education(2020). Elementary School Korean Subject 6th class second periods.
6 Lee Seung-mi 13others(2019). Systemization of Key Competencies and Skills in 2015 Revised National Subject. Korea Institute of Curriculum &Evaluation.MOE. MOE-Commissioned research-2019-7.
7 Kwon Nak-won(1997). Introduction to Curriculum. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education. Unpublished.
8 K-12 Computer Science Framework. (2016). http://www.k12cs.org.
9 Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs,2019 -2020 https://www.abet.org
10 Jang Yerum(2020). A Study on the Improvement of Information Education Operation Methods for Improving Computational Thinking : Focusing on the Comparison of Overseas Information Subject Curriculum. Kunguk Univ. Graduate School
11 MOE(2016) 2015 Commentary on the general revised curriculum:middle school.
12 Park Il-soo(2012). The Study on a Elementary School Teacher's Curriculum Orientation and Effective Teaching Behavior. 12(3).
13 Pusan Natl. Univ. of Education(2021). Elementary School Social Subject 6th class first periods.
14 Shin Soobum(2017). Research on the Evaluation Criteria of Programming Education based on Bloom's Taxonomy in the Elementary and Secondary School. 25(5).
15 Luca Trevisan(2010). Computational Complexity 2nd week lecture materials. https://cs.stanford.edu/people/trevisan/cs254-10/#info