Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.3.215

Study of Types of Questions Presented in Software and Robot Units of 2015 Revised Elementary School Practical Curriculum and Development of CT Trigger Questioning  

OH, Jeongcheol (Dopyeong Elemantary School)
Jin, Yeongji (Halla Elemantary School)
Kim, Bongchul (Jungang Elemantary School)
Kim, Jonghoon (Jeju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.24, no.3, 2020 , pp. 215-223 More about this Journal
Abstract
The results of the analysis of the 523 questions presented in the six textbooks and SW and robot units in the Blosser four-step classification categories are as follows. First, in the software unit, the analysis results showed that 77.1% were closed questions and 22.9% were open questions. Second, in the robot unit, the analysis results showed that 74.8% were closed questions and 25.2% were open questions. The CT Trigger Question was developed to overcome the limitations of the textbook questions, which were mainly closed questions, and to directly or indirectly induce computational thinking that teachers can utilize according to their educational content and activities.
Keywords
CT Trigger Questioning; Computational Thinking; Question types;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bloom, B. S.(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives : cognitive domain. New York : Longman.
2 Blosser, P. E.(1973). Handbook of effective questioning techniques. Worthington, Ohio : Education Associates.
3 CSTA & ISTE(2011), Computational Thinking teacher resources second edition
4 Daesoo Kim(2016), Software and computing thinking, Life and Power publisher
5 Dahyun Kim(2007). A Study on the Questioning of the 'Inquiry Activities' in Highschool 'Law and Society' Textbook, M.S., Ewha Womans University of Education
6 Dewey, j.(1933) How we think. Chicago: Regnery
7 Eunju Ko (2018). The comparative Analysis on Patterns of Questions in Elementary Science Textbooks between the Revised curriculum year 2007 and 2009. M.S., Gwangju National University of Education Graduate School
8 Flanders, N.(1970) Analyzing Teaching Behavior. Reading, M.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
9 Google for Education(2014). Computational Thinking Concepts Guide.
10 G. Polya(2002). How to solve it ?. JeongHo Woo translation. Seoul: Kyo Woo Publishing Co.
11 Harrop, A., & Swinson, J. (2003). Teachers' questions in the infant, unior and secondary school, Educational Studies, 29(1), 49-57.   DOI
12 Hyangsook Kim (2006), The Realization of Questions for Developing Mathematics and Creativity, Kyung Moon publisher
13 Jeongok Kim(2015). A comparative Study of Teacher Questions and the Feedback given to students by the teacher when analyzing advanced and general classes in an Elementary School. M.S., Busan National University of Education
14 Jinsook Kim (2015). SW Education Professors and Learning Model Development, Korea Educational Development Institute
15 Korean Educational Psychology Association (2010), Terminology of Educational Psychology, hakjisa
16 BBC, Introduction to computational thinking
17 Korean Dictionary, https://ko.dict.naver.com/
18 Jeongcheol Oh, Jaehyung Kim, Jonghoon Kim(2014). Development and Application of Elementary Puzzle-Based Learning Program for Computer Science Education, The Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(3), 11-23.   DOI
19 Jeongcheol Oh, Jonghoon Kim(2016), A Development of a Puzzle-Based Computer Science Instruction Model and Learning Program to improve Computational Thinking for Elementary School Students, The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marrine Sciences Education, 28(5), 1183-1197.   DOI
20 Jeongcheol Oh, Jonghoon Kim(2014), Development and Application of Puzzle-Based Computer Science Learning Contents for Pre-service Teachers, The Journal of the Korean Association Information Education, 18(3), 391-400.   DOI
21 Sojeong Ha(2010). A Study on the Publication of Social and Cultural Textbooks and the Interest of Learner's Publication. M.S., Ewha Womans University of Education
22 Soohwan Kang, Jinhyung Cho, Yonghyun Shin, Hwanil Kang(2019), Computer Overview in Software-Oriented Society, Infinity Book publisher
23 Sungik Park, Yeonkyung Kim(2004). A Review on the learning outcomes according to the types of questioning. Seoul National University College of Education, Journal of the College of Education 68, 59-79
24 The Ministry of Education (2019), Practical (technical assumptions) / Information courses, Education Ministry Notice 2015-74 Annex 10
25 Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communication of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.   DOI
26 Yeomi Kim(2019), Analysis on Patterns of Questions in Elementary School Science Textbooks under 2015 Revised Curriculum, M.S., Seoul National University of Education
27 Yongju Jeon(2017). The Development and Application of a CT-CPS(Computational Thinking-based Creative Problem Solving) Instructional Model for the Software Education of New Curriculum. Ph.D., Korea National University