Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.6.543

An Analysis of Research Trends in Computational Thinking using Text Mining Technique  

Lee, Jaeho (Dept. of Computer Education, Gyeongin Nat'l University of Education)
Jang, Junhyung (Oma Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.23, no.6, 2019 , pp. 543-550 More about this Journal
Abstract
In 2006, Janet Wing defined computational thinking and operated SW education as a formal curriculum in the UK in 2013. This study collected related research papers by using computational thinking, which has recently increased in importance, and analyzed it using text mining. In the first, CONCOR analysis was conducted with the keyword of computational thinking. In the second, text mining of the components of computational thinking was selected by the repr23esentative academic journals at domestic and foreign. As a result of the two-time analysis, first, abstraction, algorithm, data processing, problem decomposition, and pattern recognition were the core of the study of computational thinking component. Second, research on convergence education centered on computational thinking and science and mathematics subjects was actively conducted. Third, research on computational thinking has been expanding since 2010. Research and development of the classification and definition of computational thinking and components and applying them to education sites should be conducted steadily.
Keywords
Computational Thinking; Text Mining; Abstraction; Automation; Algorithm; Problem Decomposition;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zhang, W., Yoshida, T. and Tang, X (2011). A comparative study of TF* IDF, LSI and multi-words for text classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2758-2765.   DOI
2 Ji-suk Hong and Ick-keun Oh (2016). Image difference of before and after an incident using social big data analysis. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 30(6), 119-133.
3 Yonghak Kim and Yeongjin Kim (2016). Social Network Analysis: 4th edition. Seoul: Bakyeongsa.
4 ISTE(International Society for Technology in Education) (2019). ISTE STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS. https://www.iste.org/standards/forstudents.
5 Computer Science Teachers Association (2017). CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards, Revised2017. https://www.csteachers.org/page/standards.
6 Jaeho Lee and Junhyung Jang (2018). Explore for developing computing thinking tools. Journal of Creative Information Culture, 4(3), 273-283.   DOI
7 MinJeong Kim, WonGyu Lee, and JaMee Kim (2017). Presenting the Development DirectionThrough the Analysis of Tool used to MeasureComputational Thinking. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 20(6), 17-25.   DOI
8 Japan Ministry of Education (2019). About notebook about informatization of education. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/zyouhou/1259413.htm.
9 Korea Beaver Challenge (2019). Beaver Challenge introduction. https://www.bebras.kr/introduce.
10 British Broadcasting Corporation (2019). Introduction to computational thinking. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zp92mp3/revision/1.
11 TEXTOM. http://www.textom.co.kr/home/main/main.php
12 Wing. J. M(2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM. 17(3).33-35.   DOI
13 Korea Ministry of Education(2015). Commentary on the Revised Curriculum for 2015. http://www.edunet.net/nedu/ncicsvc/listSub2015Form.do?menu_id=623.
14 ISTE(International Society for Technology in Education). ISTE STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators
15 RAY. MARK (2019). Learning about Computational Thinking. Teacher Librarian 46(4), pp 8-12.
16 Prakken, L. W (1942). The Education Digest (Vol. 16). Education Digest.
17 Salton, G., and Yang, C. S (1973). On the specification of term values in automatic indexing. Journal of documentation, 29(4), 351-372.   DOI