Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.2.149

The Development of Reading and Maker Educational Program Centered on Engineering  

Park, Jungho (Dept. of Computer Education, Chinju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.23, no.2, 2019 , pp. 149-157 More about this Journal
Abstract
The fourth industrial revolution era calls for the ability to solve problems creatively based on basic literacy for technology. These capabilities can be enhanced through the maker education linked to SW education STEM convergence education. Meanwhile, one of the tasks that must be set prior to the maker education is to take an educational approach rather than a tech-centric approach and consider ways to stimulate interest and motivation of the participants. For this purpose, this study developed and applied an engineering-oriented Reading & Maker education program to prospective teachers so that they could participate in active making activities on their own with interest and sympathy rather than simply guiding maker activities. As a result of the study, the results of the maker education recognition survey after the application of the program showed a statistically significant improvement(p<.000).
Keywords
Fairy-Tale; Reading; Engineering Design Process; Maker Education; Lego WeDo;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Random House.
2 Haverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Education Review, 84(4), 495-505. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063   DOI
3 Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 30-39.
4 Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2014), Invent to Learn : Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom(p. 252). Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
5 Massachusetts Department of Education (2006). Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Author.
6 National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education. The National Academies Press.
7 National Research Council (NRC) 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
8 The Next Generation Science Standards(2013), Retrieved from : https://www.nextgenscience.org
9 Oxford Univ., 2016, Technology at Work v2.0
10 Papert, S(1988). A. Critique of technocentrism in thinking about the school of the future. In Children in the information age: Opportunities for creativity, innovation and new activities(pp. 3-18). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press
11 Park, J. H.(2015), Effect of Robotics enhanced inquiry based learning in elementary Science education in South Korea, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(1), pp. 71-95.
12 Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (Eds.). (2016). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
13 Moon, D. Y.(2008). The Development of Pre-Engineering Educational Program Model Based on STEM Integration Approach, Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(2), pp. 90-101.   DOI
14 Portsmore, M.D.(2009), EXPLORING HOW EXPERIENCE WITH PLANNING IMPACTS FIRST GRADE STUDENTS' PLANNING AND SOLUTIONS TO ENGINEERING DESIGN PROBLEMS, A doctoral dissertation, TUFTS UNIVERSITY.
15 Shim, K. H., Lee, S. W., & Suh, T. W.(2014), Development and Evaluation of a STEAM Curriculum Utilizing Arduino, The Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(4), pp. 23-32.
16 WEF(2016), The Future of Jobs
17 Wiebe, E.N., Williams, L., Yang, K., & Miller, C. (2003). Computer Science Attitude Survey, (Report No.: NCSU CSC TR-2003-1) Dept. of Computer Science, NC State University, Raleigh, NC.
18 Wulf. William A. (1998). The Urgency of Engineering Education Reform. Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education. Engineering Foundation Conferences.
19 Williams, D., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Lai, G., & Ford, M. (2007). Acquisition of physics content knowledge and scientific inqiuiry skills in a robotics summer camp. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 201- 216.   DOI
20 Stephen, N.(2004). Using Lego as a Tool to Develop Science and Mathematics Understanding Prior to Robotics Study. In Wing, A, Li, K, & White, B (Eds.) Research, Reform, Realise the Potential, 5-8 July 2004, Adelaide, South Australia.