Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.6.613

Analysis of Teaching and Learning Process in Physical Computing Class for Elementary Gifted Students in Science  

Kim, Jiye (Seoul National University of Education)
Jhun, Youngseok (Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.22, no.6, 2018 , pp. 613-628 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the teaching and learning process of physical computing using coding block for elementary gifted students in science. In order to obtain implications for teaching physical computing, we set the learning objectives from the Computer and Information Literacy Evaluation Standards developed by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement(IEA) and developed a teaching and learning program for physical computing through collaboration between science education and computer education experts according to learning objectives. The developed program was related to the use of the coding block MODI(TM) and 32 classes of physical computing instruction were conducted for 15 students of the 4th to 6th grade who belong to an education institute for the gifted in science affiliated to the University. In the physical computing class, the teaching and learning process was analyzed by collecting data such as classroom videos, class observation logs, teacher and student questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of the study, the implications of the teaching and learning process of physical computing using the coded blocks in the school education field were suggested. And we also explored the strategy of expanding the computational thinking through the activities of coding instruction to realize creative ideas.
Keywords
Elementary students; Gifted in science; Physical Computing Teaching and Learning; Computing Thinking;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010). The upcoming future, South Korea, being improved by creative human resources and advanced scientific technology. Retrieved from http://www.mest.go.kr.
2 Hwang. Y. H. & Mun. G. J. & Park. Y. B. (2016). Study of Perception on Programming and Computational Thinking and Attitude toward Science Learning of High School Students througn Software Inquiry Activity: Focus on using Scratch and physical computing materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 325-335.   DOI
3 Daniels, Susan, Piechowski, Michael M. (2010). Living with intensity : understanding the sensitivity, excitability, and emotional development of gifted children, adolescents, and adults.
4 Choi. J. W. & Lee. Y. J.(2014). Direction of Students Education Program for Fostering Creative Software Human Resource. Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(1), 19-22.
5 Lee. Y. J. & Kim Y. S. (2016). Development of election Criteria of Physical Computing Material for Software Education of Elementary Students. Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 20(2), 35-38.
6 Ministry of Education(2015). Science Curriculum.
7 Seo. Y. M. & Lee. Y. J.(2010). A Subject Integration Robot Programing Instructuin Model to Enhance the Creativity of Information Gifted Students. Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 13(1), 19-26.
8 Kim. B. M. & Kim. H. J. (2012). The study of animation Therapy model based on physical computing concept. Korea Digital Design Society, 34, 269-278.
9 O'Sullivan, D., Igoe, T (2004). Physical Computing, Thomson.
10 Kim. J., Kim. D.(2016). Development of Physical Computing Curriculum in Elementary Schools for Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(1), 69-82.   DOI
11 Kim. S. H., Lee. C. H.(2016). The three-year comparative study of effects of STEAM education programs based on physical computing. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 19(1), 11-18.
12 KICE(Kora Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation). (2016). ICILS 2018 Assessment Framework Revision and Field Trial Preparation in Korea. RRE 2016-15-2. Seoul: KICE.
13 M. Csikszentmihalyi (1990). Flow : The psychology of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
14 Kim. E. J. & Lee. T. W. (2017). How to apply flowchart for block programming language learning: solve entry missions. The Korean Association of Computer Education, 21(2), 21-24.
15 An. K. M. & Sohn. W. S. & Choy. Y. G. (2015). The Effect of Scratch Programming Education on Learning-Flow and Programming Ability for Elementary Students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 15(1), 1-10.
16 Jeongmin Lee, Yeonji Jung, Hyeonkyeong Park(2017). Gender Differences in Computational Thinking, Creativity, and Academic Interest on Elementary SW Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 381-391.   DOI
17 An. D. H. & Hong J. Y. & Song. M. S. & Jeon. H. G. & Kim. Y. S. (2018). A Study on teacher's perceptions about learning environment of physical computing. Journal of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 22(1), 147-150.
18 Choi, H.S. & Kim, M. S(2017), A Complementary Approach of Three Methods for Computational Thinking Assessment. The KoreanAssociation of Information Education Research Journal, 21(6), 639-646.
19 Hyungshin Choi (2014). Computational Thinking Framework-based Analysis of Afterschool Scratch Team Project Experiences Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 18(4), 549-558.   DOI
20 Youngki Park, Inkee Jeong (2017). Assessing Elementary School Students' Computational Thinking Skills on Bebras Tasks. The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 8(1), 27-31.