Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.4.457

Student-, School-, and ICT-Factors Predicting Computer-based Collaborative Problem Solving: Focusing on Analyses of Multi-level Models  

Lim, Hyo Jin (Graduate School of Education, Seoul National University of Education)
Lee, Soon Young (Department of Computer Education, Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.22, no.4, 2018 , pp. 457-471 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examined student- and school-level background and ICT factors that affected PISA 2015 Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) for Korean students (4863 students from 142 high schools). A two-level hierarchical linear model (HLM) was analyzed from the basic model (model 1) with no predictors to the final model (model 5) with all predictors. Results showed that first, gender, socioeconomic/cultural backgrounds, cooperation level positively predicted CPS scores while perceived unfairness of teacher negatively predicted the outcome. Second, the more frequently ICT was used for out-of-school learning purposes, the less frequently ICT was used for entertainment purposes, and the less frequently ICT was used in schools, the higher CPS scores were. Considering ICT autonomy and social interaction variables measured for the first time in PISA 2015, students who were more interested in ICT and more autonomous in using ICT devices achieved higher CPS scores. On the other hand, the more students considered ICT important as social interaction, the less they gained CPS scores. Third, in terms of school-level characteristics, the smaller the students behavior detrimental to learning, the higher the teachers perceived positive working environment, and the fewer the number of computers available per student, the higher CPS scores were. To facilitate computer-based collaborative problem-solving competence, it is important for students to have interest and autonomy in using ICT. In addition, the guidelines of ICT use and SW curriculum need to be established in order to increase the effectiveness of using ICT device in school.
Keywords
Collaborative Problem Solving; Computer-based assessment; ICT factors; PISA 2015; Multi-level models;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Brewer, S., & Klein, J. D. (2006). Type of positive interdependence and affiliation motive in an asynchronous. collaborative learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(4), 331-354.   DOI
2 Changwoo Nam & Suyeong Shin (2014). The Effects of Students' ICT-related Variables on Their Attitude toward ICT Use and Problem-solving Abilities. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(5), 1265-1286.
3 Educational Testing Service (2017). PISA 2015 released field trial cognitive items. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/test/PISA2015-Released-FT-Cognitive-Items.pdf
4 Graham, J., & Barter, K. (1999). Collaboration: A social work practice method. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 80(1), 6-13.   DOI
5 Gyun Heo (2013). Multi-level Analysis on the Using ICT Ability and Using Computers for Learning through PISA 2009 Data. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 16(1), 51-61.
6 Haemee Rim & Hyekyung Jung (2017). Comparative Analysis of Influential Factors on Computer-Based Mathematics Assessment between Korea and Singapore. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(2), 157-170.
7 Hyeongyong Park, Sunghun Ahn, Chong min Kim & Hyunjung Lim (2017). Analysis of Influencing Factors of Elementary School Students' Computational Thinking and SW Education Attitudes using 3-Level Multilevel Models. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 20(6), 83-94.
8 Hyesook Kim (2014). Effects of ICT on Academic Performance: PISA 2012 Korean Data. Korea Education and Research Information Service, RM 2014-9.
9 Hyesook Kim, Hansung Kim, Jinsook Kim & Anna Shin (2017). Education Information Level and Implications in Korea : OECD PISA 2015. Korea Education and Research Information Service, RM 2017-4.
10 Hyesook Kim, Hansung Kim, Jinsook Kim & Anna Shin(2017), Trend Analysis of ICT Accessibility and Utilization Levels of Korean Students based on OECD PISA Data. Journal of Information Policy(NIA), 24(4), 17-43.
11 Hyo Jin Lim & Jungsoo Kim (2016). A Relationship among Problem-Solving, Motivational Strategy, and Cognitive Strategy: Focused on PISA 2012 Results. The Journal of Thinking Development, 12(1), 21-42.
12 Hyo Jin Lim & Hyekyung Jung (2016). Students' Reading Engagement in Print and Digital Reading Achievement: Using a Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 17(2), 123-151.
13 Hyo Jin Lim & Hyekyung Jung (2016). The effects of student-level and school-level characteristics on digital reading: International comparitive evidence using PISA 2009. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.
14 Ingu Kang (2003). A Structural Comparison of Cooperative Learning and Collaborative Learning. Korean Education Inquiry, 18, 183-197.
15 Jaok Ku, Sungsook Kim, Haemee Rim, Hyeyoung Park & Jung-A Han (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment(PISA 2015) Main Survey Technical Report. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, RRE 2015-6-2.
16 Jungho Yang (2012). Effects of High School ICT Activities on Students' Digital Literacy in Korea. Educational technology international, 28(2), 347-369.   DOI
17 Jaok Ku, Seongmin Cho, Soyeon Lee, Hye-young Park & Namwook Ku (2017). OECD Programme for International Students Assessment : An In-Depth Analysis of PISA 2015 Results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, RRE 2017-9.
18 Jeongbeom Song (2018). A Study on the Variables Impacting Learning Continuation Intention in Students Participating in SW-Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(1), 91-102.   DOI
19 Jimin Cho & Hyekyung Jung (2013). Population inferences and variance estimation based on PISA sampling designs. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 26(4), 875-896.
20 Kapsu Kim (2014). Measuring and Applying the Self-efficacy in Computer Programming Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 111-120.   DOI
21 Kyungsung Kim (1993). A Study on the Use of Multi-Level Data Analysis in Education Research. Student Life Research, 19, 95-120.
22 Minsun Yoo (2014). The Impact of Confidence and Attitude for ICT on Student's Academic Performance: Based on PISA 2009 Results. Department of Education Graduate School, Chungbuk National University.
23 OECD (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving. OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en
24 OECD (2017). PISA 2015 Technical Report. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report/
25 Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. T., & Toit, M. (2011). HLM7: Hierarchical linear modeling. Lincoinwood : SSI, Inc.
26 Yunmi Lee & Jungmoon Yoo (2003). Effect of Gender Grouping on Cooperative Learning in Middle School Science. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 24(3), 141-149.
27 Sangjin Kang (2016). Multilevel Models. Seoul: Hak Ji Sa.
28 Youngho Lee, Dukhoi Koo & Hyo Jin Lim (2017). Effects of Student-and School-level ICT-related Factors on Computer-based Problem Solving: Focusing on Korea and Japan. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 425-435.   DOI
29 Youngho Lee (2018). A Study on Development of Collaborative Problem Solving Prediction System Based on Deep Learning: Focusing on ICT Factors. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(1), 151-158.   DOI