Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.3.277

Study on the Preliminary Teachers' Perception for the Development of Curriculum of the Robot-based Software Education in the Universities of Education  

Jeong, Inkee (Dept. of Computer Education, ChunCheon National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.21, no.3, 2017 , pp. 277-284 More about this Journal
Abstract
Software Education will be implemented at elementary, middle and high schools starting in 2018. The goal of software education is to help students develop Computational thinking skills. Especially, using robots in software education increases student interest and helps to increase creativity. In order for software education using robots to be effective, education for teachers should be effective. The development of effective education contents for preliminary teachers can be said to be the success of software education. By the way, effective education can be said to begin with an accurate analysis of the subjects. In order to develop an effective curriculum for preliminary teachers, it is necessary to grasp the level of preliminary teachers who will carry out the software education using robots. Therefore, in this paper, we surveyed the experiences, levels and perceptions of preliminary teachers to help develop software education curriculum using robots.
Keywords
SW Education; Computational Thinking; Education using robots;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 10  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bartneck, C..Nomura, T..Kanda, T..Suzuki, T..Kato, K. (2005). Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots. Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, 1.
2 Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the Educational Potential of Robotics in Schools : A Systematic Review. Computer & Education. 58(3). 978-988.   DOI
3 Changmo Yang (2014). Comparison of the Effects of Robotics Education to Programming Education Using Meta-Analysis. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 18(3). 413-422.   DOI
4 Chul Kim (2012). Analysis of Domestic Research Trend and Educational Effect in Relation to Robot Education. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 16(2). 233-243.
5 Chul Kim (2014). A Study on Contents of Robot Education Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 18(3). 443-452.   DOI
6 Disessa, A. (2000). Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
7 EunKyoung Lee.YoungJun Lee (2008). The Effects of a Robot Based Programming Learning on Learners' Creative Problem Solving Potential. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Educations. 33(2). 120-136.
8 Feng. H. C..Lin, C, H..Liu, E.Z.F (2011). Parents' Perceptions of Educational Programmable Bricks for Kids, British Journal of Educational Technology. 42(2). 30-33.   DOI
9 Jeeun Baek.Kyunghyun Kim (2015). The Effects of a Long Term Robot Based Instruction on the Creativity of Elementary Students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 19(1). 45-56.   DOI
10 Jung-Ho Park.Chul Kim (2014). A Study on the Curriculum for Elementary and Middle School in Robot and Convergence Activity. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 18(2). 285-294.   DOI
11 Kay, A. (1991). Computers, Networks and Education. issue of Scientific American Magazine, September, 138-148.
12 Ki-Cheon Hong.Jae-Kuk Shim (2013). A Study of STEAM Education for Elementary Science Subject with Robots. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 17(1). 83-91.
13 Kim, S. W..Lee, Y. (2015). A Survey on Elementary School Teachers' Attitude toward Robot. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2015(1), 1802-1807.
14 Lindh, J..Holgersson, T. (2007). Does Lego Training Stimulate Pupils' Ability to Solve Logical Problems?, Computers & Education. 49. 1097-1110.   DOI
15 Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing the Seeds for a More Creative Society. Learning & Leading with Technology. 18-22.
16 Lough, T..Fett, C. (2004). "Trends in Robotics Education : How Teacher Observations of Male and Female Robotics Students are Changing Over Time," TIES Magazine, 22-33.
17 Miller, D. P..Nourbakhsh, I. R..Sigwart, R. (2008). "Robots for Education". New York. NY:Springer-Verlag. 1283-1301.
18 Namin Shin.Sanga Kim (2009). Korean Students'Attitudes Towards Robots: Two Survey Studies. Journal of Korea Robotics Society. 4(1). 10-16.
19 Nomura, T..Kanda, T..Suzuki, T..Han, J..Shin, N..Burke, J..Kato, K. (2007). Implications on humanoid robots in pedagogical applications from cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the USA. In RO-MAN 2007-The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 1052-1057). IEEE.
20 Papert, S..Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
21 Ringwood, J. V..Monaghan, K..Maloco, J. (2005). Teaching engineering design through Lego Mindstorms. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 91-104.   DOI
22 Seong-Won Kim.Youngjun Lee (2016). The Effects of Robot Programming on the Attitudes toward Robot of Pre-service Teachers'. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education. 19(6). 91-103.
23 Soophung Chai.Seokju Chun (2015). The Effects of STEAM-based Programming Education with Robot on Creativity and Character of Elementary School Students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 19(2). 159-166.   DOI
24 YoungJun Lee.EnuKyoung Lee (2009). An Algorithm Learning Program with Robot. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education. 12(1). 33-44.
25 Younghoon Sung (2015). The Effects of STEAM-based Storytelling Robotics Education on Learning Attitudes of Elementary School Girls. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 19(1). 87-98.   DOI