Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.233

A Study on ICT Competences of Korean Students Focus on PISA 2009 and 2012  

Kim, Kapsu (Dept. of Computer Education, Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education / v.19, no.2, 2015 , pp. 233-242 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the 21st century knowledge and information society, students' ICT skills is a necessary tool. So, the OECD PISA survey and compares students' ICT skills across OECD countries by every three years. As a result, we are looking forward to reflecting on education. In this study, I analyzed the 2009 and 2012 PISA ICT statistics. Analysis items are as follows. Is any of these devices available for students to use at home or at school? How often do students use a computer for following activities at school? Analysis tools adopted a method to compare the ratios of the average. The results are as follows. In 2008, five items of availability of ICT at schools were evenly by five groups In 2012, all five items is very low group. Except for one of the eight items of use of ICT at school, and all items are the lowest group. In 2012, all eight items are the lowest group. Korea ICT indicators have been very down in 2012 than in 2009.
Keywords
PISA; ICT Competences; Korean Students; OECD;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sweet, R., & Meates, A. (2004). ICT and low achievers: What does PISA tell us?, In Karpati, A. (Ed.) (2004) Promoting Equity Through ICT in Education: Projects, Problems, Prospects, Budapest, Hungarian Ministry of Education and OECD.
2 Allen Tucker A (2003). Model Curriculum for K-12 Computer Science: New York, CSTA.
3 CAS (2012). Computer science : A curriculum for schools, Computing At School. Available at: http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/ComputingCurric.pdf
4 Hong, M. H. (2014). A Study on ICT Competences of Turkey and Korea Focus on PISA 2009 and PISA 2012. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 151-160.   DOI
5 Jonassen D. H., Carr C., & Yueh, H. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. Techtrends, 43(2), 24-32.   DOI
6 Kim, Kapsu (2013). Computer Application Education For Elementary School. KangHen Pub. Seoul, Korea, pp.10-11.
7 Kim, Kapsu (2014). Measuring and Applying the Self-efficacy in Computer Programming Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 111-120.   DOI
8 MOE (2000). Manual of ICT in elementary and secondary schools.
9 MOE (2005). Manual of ICT in elementary and secondary schools.
10 Mustafa ILKHAN (2013). Faith-The Movement of increasing opportunities and improving Technology. Proceeding of Global Symposium ICT in Education 2013, KERIS.
11 OECD (2003). Feasibility study for the PISA ICT literacy assessment: report to network A. Paris: OECD.
12 OECD (2009). PISA data analysis manual. Paris: OECD.
13 OECD (2011). PISA 2009 Results: Students On Line Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume IV).
14 OECD (2013). PISA2012 Results. www.oecd.org/pisa.
15 Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: application and data analysis methods(2nd ed.). London: Sage Publication.
16 Roschelle J. M., Pea R. D., Hoadley C, M., Gordin D. N., & Means B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 76-101.
17 So, H. J., Lim, W. Y., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Little Experience with ICT : Are They really the Net Generation Student teachers?. Computer & Education, 59(4), 1234-1245.   DOI
18 Susan Brooks-Young (2007). National Educational Technology Standards for Students, Second Edition, ISTE.