1 |
K. Pohl., G. Bockle, and F. van der Linden, Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques, Springer, 2005
|
2 |
Rational, UML Semantics version1.1, http://www.rational.com/uml, 1997
|
3 |
H. Gomaa, D. Webber, 'Modeling Adaptive and Evolvable Software Product Lines Using theVariation Point Model,' Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04), 2004
DOI
|
4 |
D. Muthig, and C. Atkinson, 'Model-Driven Product Line Architecture,' In Proceedings of the Second Software Product Line Conference (SPLC2), San Diego, U.S.A., LNCS Vol.2379, pp.110-129, 2002
|
5 |
Webber, D., and Gomma, H., 'Modeling Variability with the Variation Point Model,' In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Software Reuse, pp.109-122, 2002
DOI
|
6 |
ClauB, M., 'Generic Modeling using UML extensions for variability,' OOPSLA 2001, Workshop on Domain Specific Visual Languages, 2001
|
7 |
Keepence, B., and Mannion, M., 'Using patterns to model variability in product families,' IEEE Software, Vol.16, Issue: 4, pp.102-108, 1999
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
M. Sinnema, S. Deelstra, J. Nijhuis, and J. Bosch, 'COVAMOF: A Framework for Modeling Variability in Software Product Families,' In Proceedings of the Second Software Product Line Conference(SPLC4), LNCS Vol.3154, pp.197-213, 2004
|
9 |
M. Matinlassi, E. Niemela and L. Dobrica, 'Quality-driven architecture design and quality analysis method, A revolutionary initiation approach to a product line architecture,' VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, 2002
|
10 |
K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and S. Peterson, 'Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study,' Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, November 1990
|
11 |
H. Gomma and M. E.Shin, 'A Multi-View Meta-modeling Approach for Variability Management in Software Product Lines,' In Proceeding's of 8th International Conference (ICSR8), Madrid, Spain, LNCS Vol.3107, pp.274-285, 2004
|
12 |
P. America, D. Hammer, M.T. Ionita, H. Obbink, and E. Rommes, 'Scenario-Based Decision Making for Architectural Variability in Product Families,' In Proceedings of the Second Software Product Line Conference (SPLC4), LNCS Vol.3154, pp.284-303, 2004
|
13 |
M. Matinlassi, 'Comparison of Software Product Line Architecture Design Methods: COPA, FAST, FORM, KobrA and QADA,' Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering(ICSE'04), 2004
|
14 |
The Object Management Group (OMG), Reusable Asset Specification (RAS) Version2.2, http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/ras.htm, Nov. 2005
|
15 |
P. America, H. Obbink, J. Muller, and R. van Ommering, 'COPA: A Component-Oriented Platform Architecting Method for Families of Software Intensive Electronic Products,' Denver, Colorado: the First Conference on software Product Line Engineering, 2000
|
16 |
D. Weiss, C. Lai, and R. Tau, Software productline engineering: a family based software development process, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999
|
17 |
K. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, and K. Kim, 'FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain Specific Reference Architectures,' Pohang University of Science and Technology(POSTECH), 1998
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
C. Atkinson et al., Component-based product line engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley, London, New York, 2002
|
19 |
M. Moon, K. Yeom, and H.S. Chae, 'An Approach to Developing Domain Requirements as a Core Asset Based on Commonality and Variability in a Product Line,' IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 31, no. 7, pp.551-569, Jul. 2005
DOI
ScienceOn
|