Browse > Article

Ontology Mapping using Semantic Relationship Set of the WordNet  

Kwak, Jung-Ae (이화여자대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
Yong, Hwan-Seung (이화여자대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
Abstract
Considerable research in the field of ontology mapping has been done when information sharing and reuse becomes necessary by a variety of ontology development. Ontology mapping method consists of the lexical, structural, instance, and logical inference similarity computing. Lexical similarity computing used in most ontology mapping methods performs an ontology mapping by using the synonym set defined in the WordNet. In this paper, we define the Super Word Set including the hypenym, hyponym, holonym, and meronym set and propose an ontology mapping method using the Super Word Set. The results of experiments show that our method improves the performance by up to 12%, compared with previous ontology mapping method.
Keywords
Ontology Mapping; Mapped Concept; Mapped Property; Property Restriction Concept; Super Word Set Similarity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 H. Komilakis, M. Grigoriadou, K. A. Papanikolaou, and E. Gouli, 'Using WordNet to Support Interactive Concept Map Construction,' Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04), pp.600-604, 2004   DOI
2 J. Li, 'LOM: A Lexicon-based Ontology Mapping Tool,' Proc. of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop (PerMIS. '04), 2004
3 O. Udrea, L. Getoor, and R. J. Miller, 'Leveraging data and structure in ontology integration,' Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp.449-460, 2007   DOI
4 D. Beneventano, S. Bergarnaschi, F. Guerra, and M. Vincini, 'Synthesizing an Integrated Ontology,' IEEE Internet Computing, vol.7, no.5, pp.42-51, Sep, October 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
5 N. Choi, I. Song, and H. Han, 'A Survey on Ontology Mapping,' ACM SIGMOD Record, vol.35, no.3, pp.34-41, Sep. 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
6 J. Tang, J.-Z. Li, B. Liang, X. Huang, Y. Li and K. Wang, 'Using Bayesian decision for ontology mapping,' Journal of Web Semantics, vol.4, no.4, pp.243-262, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
7 A. Doan, j. Madhavan, R. Dhamankar, P. Domingos, and A. Y. Halevy, 'Learning to match ontologies on the Semantic Web,' The VLDB Journal, vol.12, no.4, pp.303-319, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
8 WordNet, http://wordnet.princeton.edu/
9 A. Doan, P. Domingos, and A. Y. Halevy, 'Leaming to Match the Schemas of Data Sources: A Multistrategy Approach,' Machine Learning, vol.50, no.3, pp.279-301, March 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
10 A. Maedche, B. Motik, N. Silva, and R. Volz, 'MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies in the semantic Web,' Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic Web (KTSW 2002), pp.60-68, Lyon, France, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
11 D. Aumueller, H. - H. Do, S. Massmann, and E. Rahm, 'Schema and ontology matching with COMA++,' Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp.906-908, June 2005   DOI
12 G. Antoniou and F. V. Harrnelen, A Semantic Web Primer, p.118, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, 2004
13 P. Pantel and D. Lin, 'Discovering Word Senses from Text,' Proc. of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp.613-6I9, July 2002   DOI