Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTD.2010.17D.1.077

A Study on the Definition and Measure Development for EA Functions  

Jeon, Seung-Ryul (국민대학교 비즈니스IT학부)
Kang, Jae-Hwa (국토해양부 통계정보화담당)
Lee, Bong-Gyou (연세대학교 정보대학원)
Publication Information
The KIPS Transactions:PartD / v.17D, no.1, 2010 , pp. 77-86 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, Enterprise Architecture (EA) has emerged as the important keyword in both private and public sectors. With this phenomenon, there are tremendous need for the measures of EA functions, one of the key EA research variables, to provide academic insights and accumulate research findings in this area. Thus far, multiple definitions and concepts for EA functions exist, causing confusion among observers. Thus, in order to clarify the conceptual meaning behind the term "functions of EA" once and for all, this study reviews previous literature and provides conceptual definition. Then, we identify 24 items and rigorously develop and validate the measurement instrument for EA functions, which results in five domains: Infrastructure Systemization, Integration Management, IT Governance Support, Development and Operation Management, and Investment Management.
Keywords
EA Functions; Conceptual Definition; Measure; Instrument Development;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 최재원 등, “전사적 아키텍처의 효과적인 수립과 추진방안에 대한 사례연구”, LGCNS 엔트루 정보기술 연구소, 2004.
2 한국정보화진흥원 (구 한국전산원), 정보기술아키텍처안내서, 2003.
3 Byrne, B. M., Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Application and Programming, Erlbaum, 1998.
4 GAO, IT Enterprise Architecture Use across the Federal Government Can Be Improved, 2002.
5 OMB's memorandum M-97-16, "Development, Maintenance, and Implementation of Agency Information Technology Architecture", Jul., 1997.
6 U.S. Department of Energy and Oak Ridge Associated Universities, The Performance- based Management Handbook, 2001.
7 한국정보화진흥원 (구 한국전산원), 정보기술아키텍처 이용방안 연구, 2001.
8 장시영, “전사적아키텍처 기획(EAP)을 통한 IT 아키텍처의 구 축-정보시스템 기획(ISP)의 새로운 패러다임,” 성균관대학교 경영연구소, 2001.
9 정보통신부고시 제2006-35호, 정보시스템의 효율적 도입 및 운영 등에 관한 법률에 따른 '정보기술아키텍처 도입․운영 지침', 2006. 9.
10 한국정보산업연합회(FKII), “IT 거버넌스: IT와 비즈니스의 전략적 연계”, 2006.1
11 강병서와 김계수, 한글 SPSS 12K 사회과학 통계분석, SPSS 아카데미, 2005.
12 New Mexico State, “New Mexico IT Strategic Plan Strategies”, 2001.
13 Police Information Technology Organization, “National Strategy for Police Information Systems Technical Architecture version I”, 1996.
14 Segars, A. H. and Grover, V., “Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.17, Issue 4, pp.517-525, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 김성근, 박현주 “Enterprise Architecture의 필요성 및 추진방안”, ISR, Dec. 2002.
16 박영태, “전자상거래시대 IT업무 효율화 방안에 관한 연구 -EA: 정부기관 사례분석을 중심으로”, 한국전자상거래학회, 하계학술세미나, 2004.
17 배병렬, 리즈렐 구조방정식 이해와 활용, 대경출판사, 2002.
18 안연식, 강재화, 조형래, 김문중, “IT 거버넌스의 영향요인 분석: ITA/EA 기능 중심”, 한국IT서비스학회지 제6권 제2호, pp.63-80, 2007.
19 이석균, 이영민, 류성렬, “EA성과평가 모델의 설계 및 적용사례에 관한 연구”, 정보처리학회 논문지, 제16-D권 제3호, pp.395-406, 2009.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
20 이태공, 박성범, 이헌중, 정보기술 아키텍처, 기한재, 2000.
21 Churchill, G.A., 1992. Marketing research, 5th Edition, The Dryden Press, Hinsdale, IL.
22 이헌중, “ITA 도입 및 표준화 방안”, 디지털 행정, 제25권, 제2호, pp.57-68, 2002.
23 한국정보화진흥원 (구 한국전산원), “국내 정보기술아키텍처 도입실태 분석에 대한 연구”, 정보화정책 이슈, 2005.
24 Chin, W.W. and Todd, P.A., “On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.19, Issue. 2, pp.237-246, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 CIO Council, “Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework Version 1.1”, 1999.
26 DoC, “Technical Reference Model and Standard Profile Framework,” Feb., 2001.
27 DoD Architecture Framework Working Group, “DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0 Volume I, II”, 2003.
28 DoE(ducation), “IT Architecture Principles Guidance“, Office of the Chief Information Officer, March 1999.
29 DoT, “Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework Version 1”, 2000.
30 Federal, “A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture Version 1.0”, Chief Information Officer Council, 2001.
31 IFEAD, “Enterprise Architecture 2005: How are Organizations Progressing?”, Report of the Third Measurement, Dec., 2005.
32 U.S. Department of Agriculture
33 Kappelman, L., McGinnis, T., Pettite, A., Sidorova, A, “Enterprise Architecture: Charting the Territory for Academic Research”, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Canada August, pp.1-10, 2008.
34 The Open Group, “Communication and Information System Interoperability In The Ministry of Defence.”, www.opengroup.org/public/arch/p4/cases/ukmod/ukmod.htm, 1997.
35 U.S. Custom Service, Enterprise Architecture Blueprint, 1999.
36 U.S. Department of Energy
37 Vasconcelos, A., Sousa, P., and Tribolet, J., “Information System Architectures”, Proceedings of International Conference on Performance Measures, Benchmarking and Best Practices in New Economy, Portugal, 2003.
38 Zachman, John. “A framework for Information Systems Architecture.” IBM Systems Journal. Volume 26, number 3, 1987   DOI
39 Churchill, G.A., “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.16, pp.64-73, 1979.   DOI   ScienceOn