Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTD.2009.16-D.4.561

Policy Definition Language for Service Management in Mobile Environment  

Ahn, Sung-Wook (숭실대학교 컴퓨터학과)
Rhew, Yul-Sung (숭실대학교 컴퓨터학부)
Publication Information
The KIPS Transactions:PartD / v.16D, no.4, 2009 , pp. 561-570 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to manage repair and maintenance efficiently in the mobile environment, the system structure to manage service as a policy and the policy description language are needed. This research defined the structure of PEP, which is the executioner of policy in the IETF policy framework, and proposed the policy description language which can be carried out under the PEP structure. The proposed policy description language derived demand matters based on documentary data and the characteristics of mobile and the policy information model was designed with the three stage approaches and was defined as policy description language. The three stage approaches are made up of the policy domain that decides the scope to which the policy applies, the policy rules which distinguish the kinds of policy application and control, and policy grammar which contextualizes the policy structure. In order to verify the efficiency of the policy description language, scenarios are defined with the policy description language and verified it by using policy tool and proved the expansive nature by comparing and analyzing other policy description language.
Keywords
Policy; Policy Information Model; Policy Definition Language; Policy Framework;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 K. Verlaenen, B. De Win, W. Joosen, Towards simplified specification of policies in different domains, IEEE, 2007   DOI
2 S. Jajodia et al., A Logical Language for Expressing Authorizations, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 1997, pp.31-42   DOI
3 E. Lupu and M. Sloman, Conflicts in Policy-based Distributed Systems Management, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE/IFIP International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, IEEE, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Common Information Model CIM : http://www.dmtf.org/standards/standard_cim.php
5 IETF Policy Core Information Model (PCIM): http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3060.txt
6 The Parlay Group, Comparing OMA OSE and Parlay Architectures, March, 2005
7 Open Mobile Alliance PEEM : http://www.openmobile.com
8 Stone, B. LUNDY, et al. 2001. Network Policy Languages: A Survey and a New Approach. IEEE Network: 10-20   DOI   ScienceOn
9 J. LOBO, R. BHATIA, et al. 1999. A Policy Description Language. AAAI, Orlando, Florida
10 J. Hoagland et al., Security Policy Specification Using a Graphical Approach, Technical report CSE-98-3, University of California, Davis Department of Computer Science, 1998
11 N. Damianou, N. Dulay, E. Lupu, M. Sloman, Tools for Domain-based Policy Management of Distributed Systems, IEEE, 2002   DOI
12 A. Pilz, Policy-Maker a Toolkit for Policy-Based Security Management, INST-CNR, 2007   DOI
13 E. Gagon, SableCC: An Object-Oriented Compiler Framework, School of Computer Science, McGill University. Montreal, Canada, March, 1998   DOI
14 jEdit Programmer's Text Editor: http://www.jedit.org
15 G. Russello, C. Dong, N. Dulay, Authorization and Conflict Resolution for Hierarchical Domains, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07), IEEE, 2007   DOI