Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTD.2005.12D.7.1023

Study on the Techniques in Component Workflow Variability Implementation based on the Banking Framework  

Choi Sung (서울대학교 컴퓨터학과)
Publication Information
The KIPS Transactions:PartD / v.12D, no.7, 2005 , pp. 1023-1030 More about this Journal
Abstract
CBD(Component Based Development) can make use of component of block unit that is implementation beforehand and shorten software development cost and time. Also, component can reduce complexity for the large application development because it can hide detail part of internal and offer interface. Common requirement of family in the enterprise framework environment can express workflow, but it is very difficult that express special workflow in single component on various family member's requirement. Therefore, necessity about workflow variability management between component for family member and implementation method had been required constantly. This treatise presents implementation techniques for component workflow variability in enterprise framework under Banking Loan Presented component workflow variability implementation techniques supposes that commonness business workflow that family can use in enterprise workflow was created already in component, and improve workflow's extensity between component by worikflow composition between special component and techniques for practice to various family member.
Keywords
Enterprise Framework; CBD(Component Based Development); Workflow Variability; NET Framework;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 George T. Heineman and William T. Councill, Component-Based Software Engineering: Putting the Pieces Together, Addison Wesley, 2001
2 John Cheesman, John Daniels, UML Components, Addison Wesley, 2001
3 Peter Herzum, Oliver Sims, Business Component Factory: A Comprehensive Overview of Component-Based Development for the Enterprise, WILEY, 2000
4 Carnegie Mellon University, Capability Maturity Model Integration(CMMI) Version 1.1, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, 2001
5 Gimenes, M. S., Tanaka, S., and Oliverira, J., 'An Object Oriented Framework for Task Scheduling', Proceedings of the TOOLS Europe, June, 2000   DOI
6 Sung Choi, 'CBD Engineering기초', Hong Pub Science Publication, Inc., 2005
7 Microsoft, .NET 구축방법론 : CBD & XML Web Services, 정보문화사, 2002
8 ETRI, MarMI, Magic and Robust Methodology Integrated, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, 2001
9 DSouza, D. S. and Wills, A. C., Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis Approach, Addison Wesley, 1999
10 Whitehead, K., Component-based Development: Principles and Planning for Business Systems, Addison Wesley, 2002
11 Weiss D. M., and Lai C.T.R., Software Product Line Engineering: A Family Based Software Engineering Porcess, Addison Wesley, 1999
12 Rausch A., 'Software Evolution in COMPONENTW ARE Using Requirements/Assurances Contracts', Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Software Engineering, June 2000   DOI
13 D'Souza D., Wills A, Object, Components, and Frameworks with UML, And Frameworks with UML, Addison Wesly, 1999
14 Short, K., Component Based Development and Object Modeling, Sterling Software, Technical Handbook Version 1.0, Februaray 1997
15 Dong Seab So, Seak kyoo Shin and Soo Dong Kim, 'A Formal Model of Component Variability Types and Scope', Journal of KISS: Software and Applications, Vol.30, No.5, pp.414-429, June, 2003   과학기술학회마을
16 Frank Maurer and Sebastien Martel, 'Extreme Programming Rapid Development for Web-Based Applications,' IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Heineman, G. T., Council, W. T., Component based Software Engineering, Addison Wesley, 2001
18 Microsoft, Application Architecture for .NET:Designing Applications and Services, Microsoft Corporation, 2002
19 Christian Thilmany, .NET Patterns Architecture, Design, and Process, Pearson Education, Inc. 2004
20 Lawrence G. Jones, Albert L. Soule, 'Software Process Improvement and Product Line Practice: CMMI and the Framework for Software Product Line Practice,' Carnegie Mellon University, 2002