Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTC.2008.15-C.4.245

Design and Implementation of an IP-based Fixed VoIP Emergency System  

Ko, Sang-Ki (광운대학교 전자통신공학과)
Chon, Ji-Hun (안양대학교 정보통신공학과)
Choi, Sun-Wan (안양대학교 정보통신공학과)
Kang, Shin-Gak (한국전자통신연구원 융합통신표준연구센터)
Huh, Mi-Young (한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터)
Abstract
An emergency service over Voice over IP (VoIP) network is an essential condition, like the existing telecommunication services. To support for the emergency services, standardization works have been performed. The National Emergency Number Association (NENA) has been developing the framework and procedures for an emergency service for Non-IP based network, rather than protocols. In contrast, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has been only focused on end-to-end IP-based emergency calls. The NENA architecture is incompatible with the IETF protocols. To solve the problem, we design and implement a SIP-based VoIP emergency system by adopting the NENA architecture and by applying IETF protocols, for both IP-based Pubic Safety Answering Point (PSAP) and PSTN-based PSAP. It is implemented and tested under UNIX environment.
Keywords
VoIP; Emergency Call; Session Initiation Protocol (SIP);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 H. Schulzrinne, “A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services,” draft-ietf-ecrit-service-urn-07.txt, Aug. 2007
2 T. Hardie and et. Al, “LoST : A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol,” draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-06.txt, Aug. 2007
3 H. Schulzrinne and et. Al, “Requirements for Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies,” draft-ietf-ecrit-requirements-13.txt, Mar. 2007
4 H. Schulzrinne, “Location-to-URL Mapping Architecture and Framework,” draft-ietf-ecrit-mapping-arch-03.txt, Sep. 2007
5 B. Rosen and et. Al, “Best Current Practice for Communications Services in support of Emergency Calling,” draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-02.txt, Sep. 2007
6 B. Rosen and et. Al, “Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia,” draft-ietf-ecrit-framework-03.txt, Sep. 2007
7 J. Peterson, “A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format,” RFC 4119, Dec. 2005
8 H. Tschofenig and et. Al, “Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter,” draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-16.txt, Aug. 2007
9 M. Thomson and et. Al, “Revised Civic Location Format for PIDF-LO,” draft-ietf-geopriv-revised-civic-lo-06.txt, Oct. 2007
10 M. Mintz-Habib and et. Al, “A VoIP Emergency Services Architecture and Prototype,” in Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pp.523-528, Oct. 2005
11 고상기외 4인, “이동형 인터넷전화 긴급통화 서비스 모델 설계”, 한국정보처리학회 추계학술발표대회 논문집, 제13권 제2호, pp.1363-1366, 2006
12 IETF GEOPRIV WG 홈페이지, http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/geopriv-charter.html
13 IETF ECRIT WG 홈페이지, http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ecrit-charter.html
14 NENA, “08-001 Interim VoIP Architecture for Enhanced 911 Services (i2),” Dec. 2005
15 조현식외 7인, “고정형 VoIP 긴급통화 시스템의 구현”, 한국정보처리학회 춘계학술발표대회 논문집, 제14권 제1호, pp.1327-1330, 2007   과학기술학회마을
16 NENA, “08-751 i3 Technical Requirements Document,” Sep. 2006
17 NENA 홈페이지, http://www.nena.org
18 허미영외 2인, “미국의 VoIP 긴급통화 정책 동향”, 전자통신동향분석, 제22권 제1호, pp.140-150, 2007