Browse > Article

CC 3.0의 변화 내용 분석  

강연희 (한남대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
김정대 (한남대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
최상수 (한남대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
이강수 (한남대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC), Part 1: Introduction and general model, CCEB-96/011, Version 1.0, Jan. 1996
2 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC), Part 3: Security assurance requirements, CCEB-96/013, Version 1.0, Jan. 1996
3 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 2: Security functional requirements, Version 2.1, CCIMB-99-032, Aug. 1999
4 정보보호시스템 공통평가기준, 정보통신부 한국 정보보호진흥원, 2002.8
5 강연희, 김정대, 방영환, 최성자, 이강수, '공통 평가기준(CC)과 공통평가방법론(CEM)의 변경 내용 분석', 한국정보보호학회지, 제 13권 제 4 호 2004. 8
6 Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation Methodology, Version 2.2, Revision 2.2, CCIMB -2004-01-004, Jan. 2004
7 Common Criteria Version 3.0 Update, http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/public/files/CCv3.0%20transition.pdf, June 2005
8 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1: Introduction and general model, CCIMB2004-03-001, Version 2.4, Revision 256, Mar. 2004
9 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1: Introduction and general model, CCIMB -2005-07-001, Version 3.0, Revision 2, June 2005
10 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 2: Security functional requirements, Version 2.2, CCIMB-2004-01-002, Jan. 2004
11 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC), Part 2: Security functional requirements, CCEB-96/012, Version 1.0, Jan. 1996
12 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 3: Security Assurance Requirements, CCIMB2004-03-003, Version 2.4, Revision 256, Mar. 2004
13 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC), Part 2: Annexs, CCEB-96/012_A, Version 1.0, Jan. 1996
14 국제공통평가기준, CC 2.0, 한국정보보호센터, 1998.11
15 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1: Introduction and general model, Version 2.2, Revision 256, CCIMB-2004-01-001, Jan. 2004
16 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 3: Security Assurance Requirements, Version 2.2, Revision 256, CCIMB-2004-01-003, Jan. 2004
17 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 2: Security functional requirements, Version 3.0, Revision 2, CCIMB-2005-07-002, July 2005
18 최상수, 방영환, 최성자, 이강수, '보안관리 및 위험분석을 위한 분류체계, 평가기준 및 평가스 케일의 조사연구', 한국정보보호학회지, 13권 제 3호, pp. 38-49, 2003.6
19 KISA 보안성평가센터내 수록자료, http// www.kisa.or.kr/
20 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation Evaluation Methodology, Version 3.0, Revision 2, CCIMB-2005-07-004, July 2005
21 Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation Methodology, Version 2.4, Revision 2.4, CCIMB -2004-03-004, Mar. 2004
22 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 3: Security Assurance Requirements, Version 2.1, CCIMB-99-033, August 1999
23 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 3: Security Assurance Requirements, Version 3.0, Revision 2, CCIMB-2005-07-003, July 2005
24 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation (CC), Part 4: Predefined Protection Profiles, CCEB96/014, Version 1.0, 96/01/31
25 Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 2: Evaluation Methodology Supplement: ALC_FLR - Flaw Remediation, Ver 1.1, CEM-2001/0015R, Feb. 2002
26 Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 1: Introduction and general model, Version 2.1, CCIMB-99-031, August 1999
27 Common Methodology for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 2: Evaluation Methodology, Version 1.0, CEM-99/045, Aug. 1999